Blame the Chinese to justify war. So obvious. How would they possibly know the satellite was Chinese, did they go up there and look for the 'made in China' sticker?
More likely the Globalist cabal was involved. Maybe using Deep State Chinese agents like they did with Wuhan, but it's way too obvious to say it's China who literally attacked the USA. Unless of course the Globalists want WWIII and some prime Maui property. And we know they do.
FWIW - Anonymous is most likely a Clown and Moss operation.
Anonymous has been a bunch of asses for their entire existence. It's not an "ad hominem", it's a fact. The offshoots that have spawned from them have been equally as bad, like Lizerd Squad or whatever.
Still a very interesting video. Maybe it is China, maybe not. We don’t know how easy it is to hack and take over a satellite. Could easily have been done by a BH rouge cell. The main point is that powerful lasers probably are flying over us, and with a push of a button we are dead…with no real trace except for a climate change flyer laying next to our charred bodies.
True, the point is, if it's Dew, lasers, whatever, it's CONTROLLED and PURPOSEFUL. First establish the weapon, then opportunity, then motive, it's getting clearer.
Ok I watched your video and his mapping makes 0 sense. The first satellite he points to goes over the.big island nowhere near Maui. At the end of the video he is talking about a satellite that appears to west of the whole island chain. The rest make sense, but his claims about where the sattelites are appear to be off.
I am sure it is possible to direct the angle and focus. I think that's the case with many types of sattelites, but the dude claims the satellite is directly over these fires and that doesn't seem to be the case. Had he said in the area, I would accept that.
You’re looking at a 2D rendering of a 3D model. If the program was showing the earth with Maui directly in the center of the screen, then a satellite going overhead would appear directly above it, but if I’m over to the east of Maui, and looking at the model, it’s not going to appear to be directly over it because I’m taking a side view of the satellite versus a top down view.
Completely bogus. As mentioned below, the satellite motion does not conform to the narrative. They pass over Midway Island, if they pass over anything. No discussion of the elevation angle of any laser beams. Below 30 degrees is generally regarded as being unreliable due to atmospheric absorption and refraction effects. And if you will notice, the passage is over with in a matter of seconds. Might as well track the motion of airliners as well. (It also proves out my standing contention that a satellite weapon cannot fire at a target from opposite sides, as would be required to melt ALL the wheels on an automobile.)
The laser claims are the worst, as there is no evidence for any of it. I can say with certainty that no 10 MW lasers are active in space, having been familiar with the system designs originally proposed in the 1980s and with the actual high-power laser constructed for YAL-1A in the 2000s. Anyone with a book on physics can dream up an imaginary weapon and pose as an expert. If he were an expert, he would realize that an infrared laser would have maximal interaction with anything painted a dark color---where "dark" effectively means anything other than white or aluminum. That, for me, was the tip-off that this guy is an empty hat. The idea that you can stuff a 10-MW laser into a 40,000-lb satellite is also sheer fancy. That alone was the weight of the beam generator on the YAL-1A, not counting everything else that would be required (optical train, beam pointing telescope, reactant storage / power supply, etc.).
"Well, it could have been...the way I imagined it," is not an argument. It is a fantasy.
Blame the Chinese to justify war. So obvious. How would they possibly know the satellite was Chinese, did they go up there and look for the 'made in China' sticker?
Exactly!
More likely the Globalist cabal was involved. Maybe using Deep State Chinese agents like they did with Wuhan, but it's way too obvious to say it's China who literally attacked the USA. Unless of course the Globalists want WWIII and some prime Maui property. And we know they do.
FWIW - Anonymous is most likely a Clown and Moss operation.
Anonymous has been a bunch of asses for their entire existence. It's not an "ad hominem", it's a fact. The offshoots that have spawned from them have been equally as bad, like Lizerd Squad or whatever.
We do know what's what out there fren.
This site will show you the orbits of the satellites and color codes them by who owns them: https://geoxc-apps.bd.esri.com/space/satellite-explorer/
This site will let you zoom in and click on each satellite and learn specifically what each one is. https://satellitemap.space/?constellation=starlink&norad=45094
Goovey huh!
Thanks for posting this.
Still a very interesting video. Maybe it is China, maybe not. We don’t know how easy it is to hack and take over a satellite. Could easily have been done by a BH rouge cell. The main point is that powerful lasers probably are flying over us, and with a push of a button we are dead…with no real trace except for a climate change flyer laying next to our charred bodies.
True, the point is, if it's Dew, lasers, whatever, it's CONTROLLED and PURPOSEFUL. First establish the weapon, then opportunity, then motive, it's getting clearer.
Ok I watched your video and his mapping makes 0 sense. The first satellite he points to goes over the.big island nowhere near Maui. At the end of the video he is talking about a satellite that appears to west of the whole island chain. The rest make sense, but his claims about where the sattelites are appear to be off.
A tactical weapon will definitely be able to adjust for different targets.
Not validating any part of the main story, just saying.
I am sure it is possible to direct the angle and focus. I think that's the case with many types of sattelites, but the dude claims the satellite is directly over these fires and that doesn't seem to be the case. Had he said in the area, I would accept that.
You’re looking at a 2D rendering of a 3D model. If the program was showing the earth with Maui directly in the center of the screen, then a satellite going overhead would appear directly above it, but if I’m over to the east of Maui, and looking at the model, it’s not going to appear to be directly over it because I’m taking a side view of the satellite versus a top down view.
Completely bogus. As mentioned below, the satellite motion does not conform to the narrative. They pass over Midway Island, if they pass over anything. No discussion of the elevation angle of any laser beams. Below 30 degrees is generally regarded as being unreliable due to atmospheric absorption and refraction effects. And if you will notice, the passage is over with in a matter of seconds. Might as well track the motion of airliners as well. (It also proves out my standing contention that a satellite weapon cannot fire at a target from opposite sides, as would be required to melt ALL the wheels on an automobile.)
The laser claims are the worst, as there is no evidence for any of it. I can say with certainty that no 10 MW lasers are active in space, having been familiar with the system designs originally proposed in the 1980s and with the actual high-power laser constructed for YAL-1A in the 2000s. Anyone with a book on physics can dream up an imaginary weapon and pose as an expert. If he were an expert, he would realize that an infrared laser would have maximal interaction with anything painted a dark color---where "dark" effectively means anything other than white or aluminum. That, for me, was the tip-off that this guy is an empty hat. The idea that you can stuff a 10-MW laser into a 40,000-lb satellite is also sheer fancy. That alone was the weight of the beam generator on the YAL-1A, not counting everything else that would be required (optical train, beam pointing telescope, reactant storage / power supply, etc.).
"Well, it could have been...the way I imagined it," is not an argument. It is a fantasy.
So the conspiracy theory to fact time-frame is 5-6 weeks now?