No. I'd give them a pass if they're so mentally disabled they legit don't know what they're doing. They are rare but they exist. If you've ever been to a state mental hospital, you know the kind of patient. The kind that have the mentality of a house pet.
As for "people screw up" there's a difference between a predator who targets toddlers, vs a 13-16yo kid that molests a cousin vs a 21yo horny college guy who knows better but decides to bump uglies with that 16yo jail bait anyway. He's an real idiot, and it's bad what he did, but does he deserve to be executed for it? Only if he reoffends. Stick him in prison, let him think about his bad decision for a decade. When he gets out hopefully he has a clearer head and is now 10 years separated from the influence of young adult hormones and girls gone wild pr0n. That 13-16yo range? That is the hard stuff. They need therapy and monitoring. No easy answers.
If the college dude doesn't learn tho... No more chances.
And don't get me started on pederasty. That's a social disease where the patients become the infective agent themselves.
I think he's trying to say that there are different levels of evil but while true, being 13 years old means you should have a grasp on what is and isn't acceptable behavior. Evil is evil.
Now, I also can't say to execute a kid but it's rare that kids are tried as adults to begin with.
He's not articulating it very well. It sounds like he's trying to talk circles so that he can avoid verbal castration and accusations but... he's actually making it worse that way.
If they are mentally disabled to the point where they don't know it's wrong, they should not be propped up or part of general civilization.
Also, 16 years old is age of consent in a lot of states so your example doesn't really work there either -- and also falls within most realms of Romeo and Juliet style legislation anyway.
I understand your point and I don't necessarily believe you're totally wrong, but I do believe a lot of it is wrong and you are also not articulating it very well.
Now, I am also in favor of cruel and unusual punishment for these things so you won't find a ton of sympathy from me -- it's better to strike the fear into the hearts of would-be offenders than to offer provisions that would allow them to feel safe making those "mistakes".
You'd give them a pass for sexually abusing a child??? Based on, 'nobody is perfect and people screw up??) That is truly f'd man. You need help.
No. I'd give them a pass if they're so mentally disabled they legit don't know what they're doing. They are rare but they exist. If you've ever been to a state mental hospital, you know the kind of patient. The kind that have the mentality of a house pet.
As for "people screw up" there's a difference between a predator who targets toddlers, vs a 13-16yo kid that molests a cousin vs a 21yo horny college guy who knows better but decides to bump uglies with that 16yo jail bait anyway. He's an real idiot, and it's bad what he did, but does he deserve to be executed for it? Only if he reoffends. Stick him in prison, let him think about his bad decision for a decade. When he gets out hopefully he has a clearer head and is now 10 years separated from the influence of young adult hormones and girls gone wild pr0n. That 13-16yo range? That is the hard stuff. They need therapy and monitoring. No easy answers.
If the college dude doesn't learn tho... No more chances.
And don't get me started on pederasty. That's a social disease where the patients become the infective agent themselves.
A cousin who molests anyone is just another predator. Ask me how I know.
I think he's trying to say that there are different levels of evil but while true, being 13 years old means you should have a grasp on what is and isn't acceptable behavior. Evil is evil.
Now, I also can't say to execute a kid but it's rare that kids are tried as adults to begin with.
He's not articulating it very well. It sounds like he's trying to talk circles so that he can avoid verbal castration and accusations but... he's actually making it worse that way.
Except, that's not what you said in your now deleted post. I urge you to rethink your original stance.
If they are mentally disabled to the point where they don't know it's wrong, they should not be propped up or part of general civilization.
Also, 16 years old is age of consent in a lot of states so your example doesn't really work there either -- and also falls within most realms of Romeo and Juliet style legislation anyway.
I understand your point and I don't necessarily believe you're totally wrong, but I do believe a lot of it is wrong and you are also not articulating it very well.
Now, I am also in favor of cruel and unusual punishment for these things so you won't find a ton of sympathy from me -- it's better to strike the fear into the hearts of would-be offenders than to offer provisions that would allow them to feel safe making those "mistakes".