Dr. Jan Halper calls out Matrixxx, Shady & Authority Q as Disinformation & Division PN
Starts at 9:18 in the video:
Anons, did you catch at the beginning Steve was welcoming Jan and saying it was not too late for her, its about 7 pm on UK time, she says its not too late I’m up at all hours and Space Force is often calling from Hawaii so we have an 11 hour time difference
Why is Space Force calling her?
•. She said she works for DOD.
• Space Force created by Trump
• Does Space Force have a base in HI?
• Did Space Force track and know who did the attack on Maui?
• Does Space Force have Q clearance?
•. Is that why Pelosi wanted to dissolve the new agency?
Pretty interesting, did she just reveal the agency that she works with under the DOD early on. This makes me more curious about her true role, so is Q in Space Force? He sure knew a lot about satellites. (See comments for sauce)
This is a must listen to ! https://rumble.com/v3oskih-dr.-jan-halper-hayes-congress-your-jig-is-up.html
Dr. Jan Halper calls out Matrixxx, Shady & Authority Q as Disinformation & Division…
it is incredible in so far as she’s from President Trump’s transition team, is on a DoD task force, her viral video was reposted by Trump and he called it a “masterpiece.”
“Dr. Jan Halper-Hayes is fantastic.”
Streamed today, Thursday, October 12th at 11AM Pacific Time --- on RUMBLE
Dr. Jan discusses the temperature… *infighting on social media, and much more!
00:01 - Intro & Bio
03:18 - Not a Psyop but taking the temperature.
03:50 - Concerned about the unity, certain groups on social media that are making claims.
05:40 - right now they are really concerned about 3 podcaster groups
1️ Shady Groove,
2️ intheMatrixxx,
3️The Authority Q
Elijah Streams
The authority is a division shill
Who gives a shit about them anyway.. People can say whatever they want. Listen to as many opinions as you can (no paytriots) and then try to decide what is probably more closer to truth. Libtards shout everyone is divisive and spreads disinfo..
I have my doubts about Jan Halper Hays. If her info is true, this is breaking opsec big time.
Also, has she presented any receipts? So far all i've heard are just words.
She also believes the Act of 1871 stuff. Patel Patriot and RP78 think this narrative is fake (check their show on Rumble, baseless conspiracies). It is a fake narrative based on the incorrect interpretation of "corporation".
It's not a fake narrative. I watched that baseless conspiracies episode and they didn't even come close to getting at the real meat of the issue. They are missing the forest for the trees. And I think Hays would have better info than a couple of random podcasters, no offense to them.
I have thought Matrixxx and Shady were sketchy since they constantly shit talk devolution as if it is anti-Q, which shows they haven't even studied devolution. They cover some good stuff but when they start tearing down other honest researchers with strawman arguments they lose a lot of credibility.
Believes the Act of 1871? As if it does not exist even? Lol!
It's a law on the books that you can read up on yourself. They created a corporate municipality that had it's own constitution "OF THE UNITED STATES" instead of "for the United States.. every "state" today now has it's source in that act.
There is clear distinctions between for and of in the English language.
Every state is now a corporation with their respective actually state effectively in hibernation as everybody is binding themselves within the fraudulent jurisdiction of the corporation, through simple contract fraud.
Unless she had permission to share... Then she isn't breaking operational security.
Hell, she could have been ORDERED to share for all we know.
Yes, she's mentioned she's excited to finally be given the go ahead
I'd steer clear of anyone who wants to profit off their personal theories, whether you believe them or not.
It's awfully convenient that they go out of their way to disprove a theory that goes against their own money train.
What did she say that should remain secret?
Breaking opsec, while needing receipts? If it's breaking opsec, then having receipts is only going to further break opsec...
Timestamps aren't matching up. Did they edit the video to include some shiling for Israel?
Sez Who?
Is there any confirmation of this, other than from Halper herself?
The Presidential Transition is a paid organization funded from the Federal governement https://web.archive.org/web/20161110181453/https://www.greatagain.gov/presidential-transition.html
There's probably ways to find out who exactly worked on it.
There's also room for fudging of this. Jan Halper lived in the UK in 2016 it appears, so it seems odd she would be part of the official transition, but not impossible. There's a ton of jobs to fill, so it's possible that people looking to fill these jobs put out feelers to their entire network, like
"Do you know anyone who would be good as the Director, Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement?"
Getting an email like this can be fudged into being involved with the Transition, but it doesn't make you a member of the Trump Transition Team.
Its not even from Halper. Its visible. The authority is always right in the middle of infighting. Dont let the handshake hit you on the way out
Trump said Dr. Jan is fantastic, or something to that effect. She said she is a psychologist specializing in consulting transition teams and integrating organizations. She said she taught 25,000 CEO's so the DOD hired her. She ran a group for Republicans overseas. I haven't noticed any reason to doubt her.
Trump likes posts from people who praise him. It doesn't mean he knows them well.
My point is this. How do we know she taught 25,000 CEOs? She said so.
How do we know the DOD hired her. She said so.
She was the VP of the Overseas Republicans group in the UK, but by the 2016 election, the group told her to stop using their name when she appeared on TV, because she was not longer in the group.
If we are about research, we should research her and her claims. A lot of what made her known on this board seems to come from Charlie Ward who a lot of folks on here distrust.
Buyer beware I say.
The name Halper was mentioned in a Q drop, it wasn’t positive, and it’s her cousin. Trump plays around all the time with information operators, even calling extra attention to them. Authority, Matrixxx, and ShadyGroove are asking hard questions and bringing sauce. This Halper-Hayes lady has brought forward some of the sketchiest fringe theories and I haven’t heard her back up her claims with evidence (I haven’t listened to all of her remarks). Very skeptical of her.
Especially when she just repeats Charlie Ward's old bullshit.
Trump endorsed her massively, did he do that with Charlie ward? Use your logic.
Trump has also mentioned the "pause" recently, saying it was necessary. Dr. Halper spoke of the pause first, that I know of
Funny. She probably hasn't gone as far as suggesting nesara/gesara (not sure if I've spelled those correctly) yet, has she? I always thought it was somewhat unethical for Charlie to spout the nesara/gesara crap as some people might believe that and then decide to charge their credit cards to the max thinking they didn't need to worry because all their debt would be forgiven.
Regarding Ward, not one misinformation agent speaks 100% misinformation, no one would ever bother going back. Misinformation and Disinformation is largely about snippets of easy to verify truth, maybe even some larger truths but always with spin to shape narrative and curb digs on the larger and wider connecting dots
Something seems off about her. So hard to know who to trust and who not to. Right now I have trust in God. I have faith that Trump is a servant of God and that Bishop Vigano is a servant of God. I do know that we are surrounded by evil and a reckoning is coming. Hard not to feel that all around us.
No one person is going to speak 100% truth about the plan. In an information war, you should expect the good guys not to telegraph their moves, and to put inaccurate info in with real stuff.
We're not the only ones that review these videos.
An acception to this would be historic info, as in it doesn't endanger current/future ops.
Non-sensitive info can be a great help to the public, talking about ops that have already happened.
Maintaining moral, even with lies is very common practice and should be expected. There is a reason we are researchers, so we can sift through disiformation (on both sides) and reveal truths.