A Four Century Copyright: Free the King James!
You learn something new every day. Fellow author and forum colleague David Craig has remarked that, in the United Kingdom, the King James Bible (1611) is de facto under Crown Copyright, which means that if you are a British author, you actually need permis...
https://www.apuritansmind.com/puritan-worship/the-proposal-of-john-reynolds-by-dr-c-matthew-mcmahon/
So older works don't fall under public domain in Britain?
That's GHEYSOS
JUST an FYI: OUR Bible, The New Catholic Bible, DO NOT MAKE ANY CHANGES TO THE ORIGINAL...However, there are "SOME" Biblical Scholars who say The Catholic Bible is MORE TRUE to the meaning of the Word of God than the King James...
This is a VERY sore subject amongst many people, so don't take OFFENSE to ANYONE who has an opinion...Just pointing OUT historical FACT...
Jesus wept!
The original government Authorized Bible...
Geneva Bible ftw kek
The language of the 1611 version is like a foreign language, to modern English.
However the King James Version in common use is Public Domain so an author does not need the King's Permission.
What is this post actually about?
I just had NO IDEA there was an ETERNAL COPYRIGHT that ONLY the Queen could make changes.. or that if you were a UK citizen you had to get permission to post anything from the Bible technically. So I just wanted to share it with everybody here in case you guys didn't know about it.
In every Bible you will find a copyright statement, one normally includes this on the 'verso' page of a book - the one which cites ISBN, asserts any copyright of the author and acknowledges copyright obtained.
For most Bible's there is a standard statement which grants permission without specific request, with the proviso that the number of words copied and/or the quoted words as a percentage of the whole is less than a prescribed % - usually 25% or 1,000 words.
In UK normally copyright of the author extends to 70 years following the death of the author unless the copyright expressly passes to another on death.
All publishers protect their Bibles against copyright infringement just open any of yours and look at the verso page. Thus on the basis that the original 1611 was paid for by the then king it was perfectly within his right to protect. Additionally by copyrighting it would have protected against anyone changing the translation at will, so the king and his translators/advisors would have seen this as an important way of preserving and protecting 'the Word'.
As an interesting titbit - one printing of the KJV had to be recalled and pulped - it was called the 'wicked Bible' missing the word 'not' in the 7th Commandment!
Amazing. And stupid.
An Eternal Copyright.. Only the Queen can change what's in...
Technically it would be King Charles now. Queen Elizabeth is Dead
Don't confuse The Monarch with The Crown, One is a living person while the other is a Corporation, The Monarch is CEO of The Crown Corporation and receives a salary via a mechanism known as The Civil List, each year.
The Crown Corporation is HQ-ed in The City of London, The Square Mile which is a Sovereign State, in the heart of the UK, which is not subject to UK laws.
Crown Copyright is a method of taking a skim, another method of taxation.
Yes. Cool.
I only referenced the Monarch. Because OP referenced the Queen who is dead. At least as far as we know.