Yeah.. i think this is a sign that anywhere that bans these things should probably have a user fly a drone under the cover of night to rest on the roof of the voting center, and just sit there all day picking up scans, then fly out the next day after counting is done.
Why they cost $500 is beyond me. A $5 ESP32 and $30 cellular modem could do the same thing. Or as u/Fatality points out, any Cell Phone can accomplish the same thing.
In the event they did awhile back they claimed it'd have range outside an election facility (think parking lot), though I'm skeptical that'd always be true.
If I end up getting one I'd just leave it in the car. No point in creating drama with unusual equipment inside an election facility.
I'm also skeptical that the fraud is WIFI dependent. There are plenty of other potential vectors of attack.
The simple fact that 3rd party corporations privately setup the machines before each election is more than sufficient to rig it w/out any wireless involved at all.
We need random paper ballot spot checks, or allow candidates to demand recounts in select places of their choosing. Once fraud is found in one area it necessitates a broader investigation.
So by banning his monitoring device of WIFI signals for fear of interference, they are admitting that the voting machines are connected to WIFI which also means they are not "air gapped" as we have been told they are supposed to be.
The boomerang here is they just effectively admitted the voting machines are on the internet even though they are officially not supposed to be.
If the machines weren't connected to any network as they should have been set-up...there would be no need to worry about Mike's sniffers and what they find...but then anyone could load a wifi/networking app to their own phones and sniff away. Mike machines however most likely sniff's networks that aren't broadcasting a SSID...they would hate it if someone found their signal.
Kentucky is an important one for them but I'm not entirely sure why. I simply do not believe that Beshear won the last Governor election by that thin a margin when Republicans absolutely blew out the entire state all the way down the ballot. I don't know if we were a testing ground of some kind or if something else was going on but all the fuckery that happened with vote totals going down live on TV happened in KY a full year before the 2020 presidential election
"Uncovering our federal law violating activities is a violation of federal law"
The polling stations don't need an analyzer; they need a wifi disrupter. No one should have any wifi in a zone that is supposed to be fraud free.
You can probably get by with a phone and the https://www.wifianalyzer.info/ app
According to the article, Lindell's devices also report detected devices to a centralized network, which seems like a useful feature.
Yeah.. i think this is a sign that anywhere that bans these things should probably have a user fly a drone under the cover of night to rest on the roof of the voting center, and just sit there all day picking up scans, then fly out the next day after counting is done.
Ooooh, good idea, I like it, sneak surveillance.
Why they cost $500 is beyond me. A $5 ESP32 and $30 cellular modem could do the same thing. Or as u/Fatality points out, any Cell Phone can accomplish the same thing.
In the event they did awhile back they claimed it'd have range outside an election facility (think parking lot), though I'm skeptical that'd always be true.
If I end up getting one I'd just leave it in the car. No point in creating drama with unusual equipment inside an election facility.
I'm also skeptical that the fraud is WIFI dependent. There are plenty of other potential vectors of attack.
The simple fact that 3rd party corporations privately setup the machines before each election is more than sufficient to rig it w/out any wireless involved at all.
We need random paper ballot spot checks, or allow candidates to demand recounts in select places of their choosing. Once fraud is found in one area it necessitates a broader investigation.
So by banning his monitoring device of WIFI signals for fear of interference, they are admitting that the voting machines are connected to WIFI which also means they are not "air gapped" as we have been told they are supposed to be.
The boomerang here is they just effectively admitted the voting machines are on the internet even though they are officially not supposed to be.
u/#updoot
Every cell phone across the nation scans for available wifi connections.
They going to ban cell phones next?
Sounds like Lindell is over the target and they don't like it.
Mitch McConnell getting worried.
If the machines weren't connected to any network as they should have been set-up...there would be no need to worry about Mike's sniffers and what they find...but then anyone could load a wifi/networking app to their own phones and sniff away. Mike machines however most likely sniff's networks that aren't broadcasting a SSID...they would hate it if someone found their signal.
Kentucky is an important one for them but I'm not entirely sure why. I simply do not believe that Beshear won the last Governor election by that thin a margin when Republicans absolutely blew out the entire state all the way down the ballot. I don't know if we were a testing ground of some kind or if something else was going on but all the fuckery that happened with vote totals going down live on TV happened in KY a full year before the 2020 presidential election
I think the same thing. How did Beshear win when straight down the ticket below him are all Republicans? I'm voting Dan Cameron this go round.
Ha ha, yes I just bet they are!