Minnesota Supreme Court Chief Justice Dresses Down Leftist Lawyer Working to Keep Trump Off 2024 Ballot (VIDEO)
(www.thegatewaypundit.com)
💊 RED PILL 💊
Comments (20)
sorted by:
Sticky! Why if 4 out of 5 Justices are Democrats?
Because they’re all skeptical of thee exact same piece in these trials. Can the Secretary of State decide WHAT insurrection is for the rest of the 50 States, and take Trump off the ballot per the 14th Amendment, when:
The 14th Amendment gives sole power to Congress to decide if a President has been found guilty of High Crimes and Treason.
No case record EVER of this being asked/tried.
After the Civil War which was an insurrection, plenty of prior Civil War Confederate people held public office because they were provided “amnesty”.
Has Trump been CONVICTED by Congress or was he found Not Guilty of Insurrection per Congress’s Impeachment? Trump was found NOT Guilty.
So though the court will accept the petition to rule, I’m 99% sure if you listen until the end, they are going to drop the case. Why Anons? Simple…. Trump was found Not Guilty by the Highest Deciding Branch of the US per the 14th Amendment. This automatically destroy’s a State’s ability to find Trump ineligible to be on their State’s ballot. The Supreme Court would probably also agree which makes all other State’s arguments just a tax wasting process in the end. Colorado and Georgia will find out soon enough too.
Yes it’s stupid, but stupid people can’t be told. Sometimes you must show them they are stupid. Even entire swathes of Democrats and RINOs.
We Will Win Anons. God bless you all.
Thank you for sharing this and i totally agree. these cases were made to educate the public that the education failed intentionally. All I can add is this the slave master mentality exposed as slave masters never wanted slaves to be educated. As they would no longer would allow themselves to be slaves.
Five of the Minnesota Justices, four of whom are Democrats, appeared skeptical that states can decide whether Trump can appear on the 2024 ballot.
Two of the justices recused themselves from the case.
Chief Justice Natalie Hudson sharply criticized the leftist lawyer’s argument and said, “This is a national matter for Congress to decide.”
Maybe they see it as a trap. Maybe the rightly see that after supporting the burning of the country (an actual insurrection, let's be real) or when they invaded Congress more recently (applying their same rules to them, that was an insurrection) or when they made Trump enter a bunker or whatever because of their rioting (insurrection after all).
By the same rules they are trying to catch Trump in, many Democrats are guilty of. To go this far is something that could be applied to them.
Their ruling would be on the record and could be used as evidence.
Boomerang
I remember hearing that a state government cannot decide whether an insurrection was committed against the federal government. So, this cannot be used to keep someone off of a ballot. It was something like that, I should have listened better. It was a radio talk show hosted by attorneys.
The fact is President Trump did state to go peacefully and law abiding. he also offered the NG services but Pelosi turned it down. They now perjured themselves under oath at the trial in Colorado and it is on record. They have nothing and will collapse all this lawfare and expose it as election interference also.
My state of Minnesota has tons of TRUMPSTERS!! If they remove him we will WRITE HIM IN!!
Best way to counter them. Thank you for sharing.
How are these cases even allowed to get this far?
If a state has no standing to bring a lawsuit over other states blatantly violating election law, how does some Joe Shmo have standing to remove Trump from the ballot?
This would make sense if you needed to show the people to avoid or minimize a civil war.
It’s what Trump “stands for” that they want off the 2024 ballot! Just saying
Nothing like exposing Lawfare while it is in progress.
I’m hoping Ken Paxton or some other state AG has a lawsuit ready to file directly with the Supreme Court should one of these nutcase states use the 14th Amendment, Article 3, against the President. When one state sues another state it goes directly to the SCOTUS.
If President Trump has to go through the normal appeals process, some of the appeals judges could engage in deliberate delay tactics in an attempt to keep him off a state’s ballot.
I suspect starting tomorrow the there after. the drops will be major drops and exposing them all. Glove are off now.
While I don't agree with these people who are trying their best to keep 45 off the ballot in the upcoming election, this was hardly a "dressing down" imo
It seems to me this attorney came 110% prepared for all questions and banged out some damn good answers. I hope that he loses, but he clearly knows his shit.
If he really knew his Chit he would know what he is doing is unconstitutional. But he can explain to three Judges at GTMO. Hope for him he forwards his mail there.
Came for a dressing down, stayed for a really good discussion about the entities described in section 3, the historical context, whether POTUS qualifies as an officer, whether states might end up with different Presidential ballots based on different conclusions on exclusions, etc.
By my very amateurish and ignorant reading, it'd be a Congressional invocation of the powers of Article I, Section 8, Clause 15 that would give the grounds for a state to remove a candidate for section 3:
https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/artI-S8-C15-1/ALDE_00001077/['insurrection']
EDIT: Here they finally seem to be getting to it!
https://youtu.be/U140yQXlpAg?t=3041
Thank you for the links.