In other words, pay no attention to that man behind the green curtain... and who are you gonna believe, US who give you honest information or your damned lying eyes?

This post inspired by u/2ndenthusiast 👈🏻

https://greatawakening.win/p/17rTBQRpod/what-an-odd-thing-to-say--i-look/c/

UNESCO Link

Check out all of the global propaganda produced here. Complete lies about covid. This is Joseph Goebbels level Big Lie propaganda.

This UNESCO campaign is implemented jointly with the European Commission, Twitter and the World Jewish Congress.

🚩 Claims virus was artificially created by people with a specific interest.

It was created in a Chinese Communist Party (CCP) weapon lab funded by the US Department of Defense and National Institutes for Health.

🚩 Claims that certain sanitary measures to counter the spread of the virus are used to intentionally harm or control society.

The vaxxines absolutely suddenly harm people with death. The vaxxine's mRNA changes or controls recipient's God Given DNA.

rely on verified information = surrender your own critical &: free thought ability. Trust us.

When in doubt => see above ( Uncertainty, fear and complexity) don't share = repression. Always show true faith towards us.

Stop the spread . I agree. So, Don't take their transfection or VAXX!

The biggest red flag: It is free and oh you get free fries too.

The "Be Careful" warning is BS.

Wow. Propaganda like never before. Warning people that they are in danger if they read something these dweebs say is untrue. So sickening...............

Is this old? I mean come on...both Brian Wray (FBI) and Dr. Redfield (former CDC head) are on the Congressional record as to this virus coming from the Wuhan Lab....Hell, Bill Gates' 2010 Ted Talk specifically says he wants to use vaccines to depopulate the planet in the name of Climate Change....These people have straight up told us what the conspiracy theories are right to our faces!

The bottom line SHOULD read...

When in doubt... get the guillotine.

The points under "what are the red flags"

Looks like 100% projection to me, Jim.

So according to this, 33% of all humans need to be put in the box cars and sent off to the Rainbow Gulag.

I appreciate the honesty.

Is this an article from The Bee?

Hmm, I don't buy into any of those conspiracy theories.

Yeah, I really like the red flags. All true, as far as I can tell.

Whatever ultramodernity places under the dominion of signs[,] postmodernity subverts with virus. As culture migrates into partial-machines (lacking an autonomous reproductive system) semiotics subsides into virotechnics.

Virohyping sweeps through the advertising industry.

Everyone will be doing it.

General principle for viral take-overs in the media: the more unsophisticated the contagion, the bigger the splash (diversionary tactics excepted).

K-war derives its sole coherence from the unity of its foe.

— Nick Land, Hypervirus, 1995

Count Zero rigorously formulates cybergothic interlock, condensing the digital underworld onto the black mirror. Human neural-to-infonet uploading and Loan infonet-to-neural exactly correspond as phases of a circuit, amalgamating travel and possession. In the irreducible plexion of the interchange hacker-exploration = invasion, 'K-function'.⁸⁷

It is not a matter of theorizing or dreaming about the loa, but of succumbing, or trying to run. As K-viral social meltdown crosses into its China-syndrome, self-organizing software entities begin to come at you out of the screen. Viruses drift toward the strange attractor of auto-evolution, spread, split, traffic programming segments, sexuate, compile artificial intelligences, and learn how to hung. Voodoo on the VDU [visual display unit].

In the Voodoo, the living. These principal economic flow of power takes places through armament and drug exchange. The trading arena, the market, is my blood. My body is open to all people: this is democratic capitalism.⁸⁸

⁸⁷ Deleuze and Guattari, A Thousand Plateaus, 88-9 (see below)

⁸⁸ Acker, Empire of the Senseless, 55

— Nick Land, Cybergothic, 1998

The transcendent evaluation of an infection presupposes a measure of insulation from it: viral efficiency is the terminal criterion.

Intelligent infections tend their hosts.

Metrophage: an interactively escalating parasitic replicator, sophisticating itself through nonlinear involvement with technocapitalist immunocrash. Its hypervirulent terminal subroutines are variously designated Kuang, meltdown virus, or futuristic flu. In an emphatically anti-cyberian essay Csicsery-Ronay describes the postmodern version of this outbreak in quaintly humanist terms as:

[A] retrochronal semiovirus, in which a time further in the future than the one in which we exist and choose infects the host present, reproducing itself in simulacra, until it destroys all the original chronocytes of the host imagination.⁶

The elaboration of Csicsery-Ronay's diagnosis exhibits a mixture of acuity (infection?), confusion, and profound conservatism:

[N]ot thinking about 'increasing the human heritage' ... dams up the flow of cultural time and deprives future generations both of their birthright as participants in the life struggle and attainments of the species and the very notion of history as an irreversible flow encompassing generation, maturation, and the transference of wisdom and trust from parents to children, teachers to students. The futuristic flu is a weapon of bio-psychic violence sent by psychopathic children against their narcissistic parents.⁷

It's war.

⁶ I. Csicsery-Ronay Jr., 'Futuristic Flu or, The Revenge of the Future', in G. Slusser and T Shippery (eds.), Fiction 2000: Cyberpunk and the Future of Narrative (Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press, 1992), 26.

⁷ Ibid., 33.

— Nick Land, Meltdown, 1994

There are variables of content, or proportions in the interminglings or aggregations of bodies, and there are variables of expression, factors internal to enunciation. Germany, toward November 20, 1923: on the one hand, the deterritorializing inflation of the monetary body and, on the other, in response to the inflation, a semiotic transformation of the reichsmark into the rentenmark, making possible a reterritorialization. Russia, toward July 4,1917: on the one hand proportions of a state of "bodies" Soviets-provisional government, and on the other the elaboration of a Bolshevik incorporeal semiotic, accelerating things and contributing to the action of the detonating body of the Party. In short, the way an expression relates to a content is not by uncovering or representing it. Rather, forms of expression and forms of content communicate through a conjunction of their quanta of relative deterritorialization, each intervening, operating in the other.

We may draw some general conclusions on the nature of Assemblages from this. On a first, horizontal, axis, an assemblage comprises two segments, one of content, the other of expression. On the one hand it is a machinic assemblage of bodies, of actions and passions, an intermingling of bodies reacting to one another; on the other hand it is a collective assemblage of enunciation, of acts and statements, of incorporeal transformations attributed to bodies. Then on a vertical axis, the assemblage has both territorial sides, or reterritorialized sides, which stabilize it, and cutting edges of deterritorialization, which carry it away. No one is better than Kafka at differentiating the two axes of the assemblage and making them function together. On the one hand, the ship-machine, the hotel-machine, the circus-machine, the castle-machine, the court-machine, each with its own intermingled pieces, gears, processes, and bodies contained in one another or bursting out of containment (see the head bursting through the roof). On the other hand, the regime of signs or of enunciation: each regime with its incorporeal transformations, acts, death sentences and judgments, proceedings, "law." It is obvious that statements do not represent machines: the Stoker's discourse does not describe stoking as a body; it has its own form, and a development without resemblance. Yet it is attributed to bodies, to the whole ship as a body. A discourse of submission to order-words; a discourse of discussion, claims, accusation, and defense. On the second axis, what is compared or combined of the two aspects, what always inserts one into the other, are the sequenced or conjugated degrees of deterritorialization, and the operations of reterritorialization that stabilize the aggregate at a given moment. K., the K.-function, designates the line of flight or deterritorialization that carries away all of the assemblages but also undergoes all kinds of reterritorializations and redundancies — redundancies of childhood, village-life, love, bureaucracy, etc.

— Deleuze & Guattari, A Thousand Plateaus, 1987