Seems like it was filed in a state court, so federal courts wouldn't be involved. (But the guy doesn't specifically say that in so many words, just that the cases this ruling applies to were filed in response to state-brought cases in state court.)
Almost as of its on purpose,so that when you type keywords into search engines like Trump and Court all your inundated with is Cases against him not for him. Then you also get all the media noise.
This sounds big but alas, I’m not getting it.
Means that the trials will take place in a county that's not the county being accused of election rigging. Which is actually a very logical thing.
Or bumped up to SCOTUS? Justice Clarence Thomas presides over GA in 11th circuit.
Seems like it was filed in a state court, so federal courts wouldn't be involved. (But the guy doesn't specifically say that in so many words, just that the cases this ruling applies to were filed in response to state-brought cases in state court.)
So logical I never dreamed it would happen in clown world!
IS there a county without election rigging? Asking for a fren.
Good question! But we'll pretend for a while longer. And maybe the judges elected under one rigger can be objective about a different rigger.
There's a boatload of cases going on fren, I don't blame you. I don't have them all straight either.
On the surface I suppose it's to his benefit, but only if the judges he gets elsewhere are more even-handed.
Almost as of its on purpose,so that when you type keywords into search engines like Trump and Court all your inundated with is Cases against him not for him. Then you also get all the media noise.