Yes. I try to educate people on the Rothschilds as much as possible. Most think I'm foolish when I tell them that Forbes richest list is bullshit and that the controlling families have wealth in the trillions.
In the case of Rothschilds wealth, I think it exceeds the estimate of 500 trillion by a substantial amount in 2023.
I'm all about building personal wealth but not when it's ill gotten. It's hard to fathom how much different the lives of 7 billion people could be had this money not been stolen from them for the gain of 1 family.
I keep thinking of 'as above, so below'. The Rothschilds are the top of the pyramid that we know. But if there is a pyramid above that, which is upside down; It could hold multiple families.
I agree, there must be many, many families richer than the Rothschilds. Using the same basic calculation shown in the video - If a family saved a more modest amount than the initial £20 million the Rothschilds saved, but saved their family's money earlier on in history, maybe in 1715 or 1615, there would have been more time to accrue compound interest.
Using a starting point of 1715 or 1615 is very conservative, as proof, these two articles are about inter generational family wealth that has lasted 600 and 800 years.
Definitely No one can serve two masters. Either you will hate the one and love the other, or you will be devoted to the one and despise the other. You cannot serve both God and money. Matthew 6:24
this is why Mankind has stopped building cathedrals, monuments, general beautification of the places they live & work. that incomprehensible-cosmic level of wealth-extraction eats into the Soul & Vitality in all persons. why bother doing above the bare survival minimum when 99% of the fruits are siphoned into an invisible, all-pervasive singularity?
IDK. If every person on this planet suddenly came into a few million dollars there would be chaos. Sure, for a day or two folks would live very nicely, but then they'd get the urge for a McDonalds quarterpounder with cheese and..........no one would be in the store to fix it, since every one would have quit because they were overnight millionaires. Any system on Earth needs people at the lowest levels to help others do things or get things done. Yea, we can cast shade on the Rothchilds and it is well deserved, but there will always be poor people, because that is how humanity works. Millionaires will not want to scrub toilets for billionaires for a few bucks a week.
Fools and gold are soon parted. You could redistribute the wealth as you suggest and the basic rules of economics would still go to work and recreate the giant wealth differentials we have now. It wouldn't take long. We know this because historical data tell us the average lottery winner is broke within 7 years of winning. They don't understand the basic rules of the economy, spend more than they can afford, and find themselves poor again.
Those who are industrious and produce value will be rewarded. The government will still siphon off the lion's share to itself and "redistribute" it to connected people. The really industrious people figure out how to provide things that government can't live without: banking services, arms dealing, and with nationalized health services, the drugs.
I think society needs to get back to everyone being independently self-reliant for food, cleaning, home repairs, car repairs, etc. We need to stop out-sourcing basic chores past generations did for themselves. And no fast food. No big box stores. I'm going to have to learn how to tile . . .
Are you using the same shoddy math as this guy, which is so easily disproven by looking at the current UK debt and realizing 8% of it is 200 billion pounds, not the 241 trillion times 0.08 that this guy's math says it would be?
Yes. I try to educate people on the Rothschilds as much as possible. Most think I'm foolish when I tell them that Forbes richest list is bullshit and that the controlling families have wealth in the trillions.
In the case of Rothschilds wealth, I think it exceeds the estimate of 500 trillion by a substantial amount in 2023.
I'm all about building personal wealth but not when it's ill gotten. It's hard to fathom how much different the lives of 7 billion people could be had this money not been stolen from them for the gain of 1 family.
Agree, and to think the roths might just be a front/public facing family covering up more (families) than we know.
👍
I keep thinking of 'as above, so below'. The Rothschilds are the top of the pyramid that we know. But if there is a pyramid above that, which is upside down; It could hold multiple families.
I agree, there must be many, many families richer than the Rothschilds. Using the same basic calculation shown in the video - If a family saved a more modest amount than the initial £20 million the Rothschilds saved, but saved their family's money earlier on in history, maybe in 1715 or 1615, there would have been more time to accrue compound interest.
Using a starting point of 1715 or 1615 is very conservative, as proof, these two articles are about inter generational family wealth that has lasted 600 and 800 years.
Most generational wealth is destroyed by multiple inheritors who mostly squander the money.
Absolutely. The committee of 300 control the world.
Definitely No one can serve two masters. Either you will hate the one and love the other, or you will be devoted to the one and despise the other. You cannot serve both God and money. Matthew 6:24
this is why Mankind has stopped building cathedrals, monuments, general beautification of the places they live & work. that incomprehensible-cosmic level of wealth-extraction eats into the Soul & Vitality in all persons. why bother doing above the bare survival minimum when 99% of the fruits are siphoned into an invisible, all-pervasive singularity?
IDK. If every person on this planet suddenly came into a few million dollars there would be chaos. Sure, for a day or two folks would live very nicely, but then they'd get the urge for a McDonalds quarterpounder with cheese and..........no one would be in the store to fix it, since every one would have quit because they were overnight millionaires. Any system on Earth needs people at the lowest levels to help others do things or get things done. Yea, we can cast shade on the Rothchilds and it is well deserved, but there will always be poor people, because that is how humanity works. Millionaires will not want to scrub toilets for billionaires for a few bucks a week.
Fools and gold are soon parted. You could redistribute the wealth as you suggest and the basic rules of economics would still go to work and recreate the giant wealth differentials we have now. It wouldn't take long. We know this because historical data tell us the average lottery winner is broke within 7 years of winning. They don't understand the basic rules of the economy, spend more than they can afford, and find themselves poor again.
Those who are industrious and produce value will be rewarded. The government will still siphon off the lion's share to itself and "redistribute" it to connected people. The really industrious people figure out how to provide things that government can't live without: banking services, arms dealing, and with nationalized health services, the drugs.
I think society needs to get back to everyone being independently self-reliant for food, cleaning, home repairs, car repairs, etc. We need to stop out-sourcing basic chores past generations did for themselves. And no fast food. No big box stores. I'm going to have to learn how to tile . . .
Not to mention massive inflation...
GLOBAL GDP was $100.6 trillion in 2022. You expect me to believe a single family has FIVE TIMES that yearly economic output of 7 BILLION people?
https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.CD https://www.uscurrency.gov/life-cycle/data/circulation
Stored in what? All the gold and silver in the world don't come close. In cash? The US only has $2.3 trillion in circulation.
Wait, I know, they own 100% of every publicly traded corporation on Earth! No, that's only $112 trillion in market capitalization.
https://www.statista.com/statistics/274490/global-value-of-share-holdings-since-2000/
Are you using the same shoddy math as this guy, which is so easily disproven by looking at the current UK debt and realizing 8% of it is 200 billion pounds, not the 241 trillion times 0.08 that this guy's math says it would be?