Recently, more and more food manufacturers have been adding QR codes to their products.
They list it as being a link to the full nutritional information. There are obviously only two reasons they would do this:
- Hide Information
- Track who looks at their information “This one can see.”
While obvious, I didn’t bother to confirm this until yesterday. Any QR code was simply considered to have poison in it, in spite of the label, if it had a QR code.
This is now confirmed.
“This product only has onions, spices, and tomato puree, we super promise!!!” “Click here for the full nutrition information.”
borrow some random old couple’s phone to scan the code
4th tab over out of 5 “additional information” 3rd collapsed textbox down out of 8
“Oh yeah, this crap totally has bioengineered ingredients in it too. Sorry we ran out of space!!!” “Hey, I know you’re sick and I’m very, very sorry, but we DID warn you!!!” said the Satanist.
As a general rule, it is probably quite reasonable to assume anything from CONagra is poison.
Thanks for sharing. As a rule of thumb if the ingredients aren't listed I move on. Also natural flavors I leave behind that means it could be anything! Yet, kids can't take peanut snacks to school because someone might be exposed. Hello, blanket terms like "natural flavors" can be anything in the universe that's natural like bugs, dirt, body parts etc. A fake meat plant is being built in Wilson County NC. Those workers will probably be exposed to toxins not any different than exposed on other jobs. You just expect better from something you are eating. I'm ok with plant based meat if that's your thing but bio engineered food is crossing the line. I still buy some foods that I don't cook but we are all playing Russian roulette every time we consume anything today.
If something is gmo, like corn, is it classified as bio-engineered?
Yes, that is the definition.
I think we need to be super careful.
"Bio-engineering" is what humanity has been doing in agriculture since the beginning of time.
What makes these people evil, and what is poisoning us, is not the DNA sequences in the food. It is the fact that they are able to pollute the food with poisons and such and the plant survives.
The way God created this earth, we are supposed to rely on Nature (God) to provide for us. Through diligent labor, we can modify our environments to produce healthy food using natural processes.
The way these devil-worshipers operate is they assume that God is wrong about everything, nature is evil, and they do everything they can to subvert nature and produce food unnaturally. By fertilizing the soil they kill the natural biology. By applying all sorts of chemicals they kill anything that survives the fertilizer. Then they engineer plants that can survive this toxic mess, wrap it in plastic and sell it as food. Sometimes they even put the "organic" label on it.
People like Joel Salatin, Gabe Brown are re-learning what our ancestors knew, and finding ways to farm and raise food without relying on chemicals and pharmaceuticals (sorcery).
No. Do not be careful about this. Learn about wha bioengineering actually is, how it is done, and how it works. Some very common problems with GMO food- they are engineered to grow very fast- this sounds good because they get big quickly. However, it takes time for the plant to uptake essential trace metals like zinc and deposit them into the produce. So the plant will be devoid of those minerals, though they will taste similar, and if processed, will have added "stabilizers" and "natural flavors" to mask the fact that you're eating a tasteless lump with no major nutritional value.
There is a massive difference between hybridizing and "bioengineering"
"The U.S. Department of Agriculture defines bioengineered food as food that “contains detectable genetic material that has been modified through certain lab techniques that cannot be created through conventional breeding or found in nature.”" https://theconversation.com/what-is-bioengineered-food-an-agriculture-expert-explains-175003
I think you missed my point entirely.
It is not the genetic manipulation that is harmful in and of itself. Otherwise, they wouldn't even allow us to have words like "bioengineering" or "genetically modified."
The REAL danger is from using chemicals to grow crops. It kills the soil. It removes nutrition from the crops. The bio-engineering makes plants that look healthy but are not, and live in toxic wastelands called the modern farm. And then we eat these things, which are grown in these chemicals, deprived of vital nutrients, and we get sick.
Again, they are not bio-engineering our food to make it healthier and to help us live long, productive lives. They are doing it so that they can spread poison on their farmlands and call it agriculture!
I am arguing that genetic manipulation is absolutely harmful.
Both chemical farming and GMOs tweaked to support chemical farming are huge problems. And pesticide farming in addition to chemical farming is another major problem.
There are a lot of REAL dangers. Many have varying levels of severity, but they cannot simply be handwaved as innocuous if another that seems more severe also exists.
It's like the statement that Vaccines cause Autism (which is a ridiculous catch-all term for many different conditions that denote delayed physical or social development). It is probably the primary driving factor of many of the conditions collected under the Autism label. But there are many, many other components of child development that are so poorly done in modern society that they have been studied and linked to the development of Autism as well.
Such as chronic fear/anger/abuse, a lack of sunshine, a lack of physical activity, a diet deficient in fat-soluble vitamins primarily from animal sources, unfettered screen time for developing minds, a diet deficient in sustainably grown food, a diet full of toxic processed foods, sugar, toxic environments that force the body to permanently be in full detox mode, heavy metal poisoning, a mother not raising her children, no father in the home, or not getting the correct nutritional profile for someone's genetics (like say an iodine deficient diet for a child with coastal ancestry). There are many factors, all essential to the development of healthy bodies and minds, and they all have to be nurtured.
Many of these factors can put a child on the edge of having severe developmental issues, and the addition of a toxic vaccine pushes these issues over the edge because the exotic and difficult to metabolize nature of the vaccine adjuvants (the "genetic material" included is just different forms of cultured snot, which has never been proven to do anything) depletes many of the body's resources trying to detox instead of spending them on growth.
Regarding something like pesticides.
The primary purpose of pesticides is to prevent insect activity. There are thousands of species of insects whose job is solely to kill unhealthy plants, and pesticides kill the insects and prevent them from doing their job.
If insects ate healthy plants, we would not have a world to live in. There are factors in healthy plants that are not present in unhealthy plants that prevent insects from eating them.
Boron sufficiency is one of the clearest ones. Boron is responsible for rigid cell walls in plants, and when a fruit is high in boron, it will have a crisp texture, while a deficient fruit will be mealy- and you practically expect to bite into a worm when you eat a mealy piece of fruit. Boric Acid and Borax are incredibly effective at controlling insect activity (and safe to humans and pets) in household situations because it applies that principle (though the vast majority of people have no idea why)- that Boron tells insects to go somewhere else or stop reproducing because their purpose has been fulfilled.
If you want to argue that different sequences of DNA can cause harm to humans in and of themselves, you'll get nowhere, logically speaking.
If you want to argue that thing grown from different sequences of DNA can cause harm to humans, then you are going to have to point to specific combinations of proteins that cause harm, and that's a hard dog to hunt with.
What I am saying is you can easily argue that herbicides, pesticides, insecticides, fungicides are dangerous to humans. This is a well-known fact. You can then say that genetically modified crops are resistant to these chemicals, and so farmers use more of them to increase yields, and that harms humans directly. You can't wash chemicals out of the inside of your corn.
And what I am saying, and I think the most important point, is that putting chemicals in our soil, including fertilizers, literally kills the soil. By killing the soil, we destroy the natural processes that bring nutrients into our food and into our bellies and bodies and keep us strong and healthy. The plants that are grown using GMO practices thus are killing us, because we should be eating natural plants grown in living soil with the full spectrum of natural nutrients, not monsters grown in an "outdoor lab" we call the modern farm.
What we SHOULD be doing, and what GMO is PREVENTING us from doing, is lightly tilling the soil, if at all. Using natural fertilizers such as manure. Treating soil health as the most important factor, not yields. And focusing on developing foods that are extremely high in nutrients, especially the micronutrients that we are just learning about now (like boron as you mentioned.) GMO is interfering with this economy, making it difficult for people to grow and sell healthy food! Consumers are fooled into buying food that looks fresh and healthy but is actually devoid of nutrition!
The only way to be sure your food is safe, is to grow it yourself. Jerusalem Artichokes and Sorghum are easy to grow, and super nutritious. Why keep mowing your lawn?
“Hey you. Yeah, you! All those plants there that aren’t ‘grass’.. they’re ‘weeds’!!! You need to pick them out because they’re ugly!!! Oh they definitely aren’t medicine. Especially that stupid dandelion over there. Kill it with fire.
Better yet, use this poison that will give you cancer to kill it. Don’t worry, it’s safe.
Yeah, HEY, yeah!!! You should even compete to see who can spray the most poison to have the least medicine on your property. Sorry, your ‘lawn’.
Law-n. Lulz.”
Next time you see one, can you post a picture? What product was it that you found this?
I am also very interested in the twisted "consent" that the Satanists seem to try to procure for their ritual actions in the form of hidden revelation of their methods.
It’s probably better that I don’t, unless a running list was kept of every GMO or non-candid label there is, which is most of most grocery stores right now.
Everyone has to learn to keep an eye out for this stuff. I’ve seen several foods where this was done. This was only an exercise in confirming it.
If you want to validate one of these, just scan a few QR codes on food that allegedly doesn’t have anything in it.
I’m not making this up, but you also shouldn’t take my word for it. We have to validate things ourselves.
I'm just asking which specific product you validated this with so I can do the same. I'm not asking for many examples, literally just the one that you performed this exercise with.
There is nothing to validate if you cannot provide even a single tangible example of what you are talking about.
I am curious myself as I would like to have a better idea of how this labeling is being done, and I would prefer not to spend hours looking at labels of food that I already do not buy.
Try Talenti Gelato (A UniLever Company, because deodorant and ice cream are the perfect vertical supply chain integration) if you like.
It’s everywhere, though.