Two more House members announce they won't seek reelection. Total now 7 senators 33 House members.
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (25)
sorted by:
This is horribly misleading:
https://ballotpedia.org/List_of_U.S._Congress_incumbents_who_are_not_running_for_re-election_in_2024
Your criticism is valid but no where did I try an insinuate this number was "Unusually" High. Just posting the current totals along with a Q post that correlates with it.
If we had ~45 Congressmen not running for re-election prior to Q why would ~40 Congressmen not running for re-election after Q indicate it had anything to do with Q? In other words by the very nature of posting the two together I think the folks in search of their hopium hit for the day are going to read cause and effect into that. The historical numbers let you assess how likely that is. If the usual number was 10 and suddenly its 40, that yields a very different conclusion than if this number is no higher than usual.
I understand that however keeping track of this has been a subject post here in the past. People do like to track this specific data point, and if they are reading whatever purposed hopium hit from the post than that is their problem, not mine. This argument could be used for nearly all information posted here, its all subject to ones own interpretation and precepts. Just because you dont care for it, tough, it's an open forum.
Perhaps I'm a bit sensitive because I get bans for "dooming" from time to time when I point out the history of something makes it unlikely the reality of it is happening is the way people here want it to happen.
Who here wouldn't want corrupt Congressmen offered the opportunity to just walk away and take it? That's part of the plan. But the numbers over the last decade have been far too consistent to believe that anything different is happening this time than in 2012 or 2014 or other pre-Q elections.
Whatever your personal issues may be that doesn't change the fact that this metric has been tracked and posted and there are other people besides yourself here that are interested. Using the search bar I took the time to pull up other examples of this as a proof to you that this sites users have indeed shown interest in keeping track of this.
https://greatawakening.win/search?params=Reelection&community=GreatAwakening
If you would like to continue to complain that this isn't the content you prefer to see then you'll have to find someone else to listen to because I don't care about your complaints nor do I regret anything.
Whatever fren, the truth shall set you free.
That Q post is suspicious because its claiming a normal phenomenon is proof of a secret explanation. It didn't say "some people" it said "any person".
I cant necessarily disagree with you there. I am never convinced of anything 100% except for my Faith in God.
I like how you dig for more info on posts. So many people just go with the flow and don't put much (or any) thought into the info they're given.
I like the charts there. Thank you for posting.
Let’s monitor how it changes in the coming months.
So let’s hope we get some MAGA peeps to replace them
Yes everyone needs to be scrutinized and vetted, with so many eyes now on the candidates we need to keep the pressure on.
Exactly. Watch out for fake MAGA.
We need 100% participation congress.
Now that's a fact.
We have a lot more time to make those numbers go up.
Looks like a trend and if it continues it'll obviously be setting up a "clean house".
https://qalerts.net/?q=Clean+house
No trend, in the last 10 years each election has seen 40-55 members of Congress not seek re-election.
https://ballotpedia.org/List_of_U.S._Congress_incumbents_who_are_not_running_for_re-election_in_2024
Link to short update here:
https://justthenews.com/government/congress/two-more-house-member-announce-they-wont-seek-reelection
Most likely 98% of Congress should be forced out!
Why isn’t that post signed by Q?
This is one of the EARLIEST posts .. ( which is attributed to Q) when Q was not signing them .. as he came to do later on .. complete with a ‘verification code’ [ i forget the correct term] to verify the posts came from Q
trip code
Not sure why exactly but I believe it wasn't until post 61 they ended the post using Q.