πΉππ TSA director arrested by US Customs and Border Protection in Florida πΉππ
(archive.is)
- N C S W I C -
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (49)
sorted by:
Just one more thing brought to us by fake 9-11.
Patriot Act - Legalized spying on all Americans.
Dept of Homeland Security - Responsible for tens of millions of illegal invaders.
TSA - They'll grab your crotch and take pictures of your penis all they want.
Bush and Obama counted this as job creation! Literally adding thousands of people to the taxpayer funded payroll was seen as a win by those guys. Lol morons.
They threw away my fuckin sunscreen brand new bottle too big they say.
I then asked if I can squeeze some in the garbage can to make it compliant, the bitch said no , had to be a small bottle.
Thanks Bin Ladin and W. Have fun reading the note from the funeralπ€¬ π±π±
how do you think 9/11 was "fake" Honest question.
Building 7, c'mon man!
Plus it was active intelligence that a plot like that was in the works and it was willfully ignored to necessitate action. Just like Pearl Harbor, Gulf of Tonkin, USS Liberty... The list goes on and on. Just cause people call it "fake" does not mean they dont think it happened, it is just more convenient to express a simple statment like that after all the evidence they have seen that counters MSM talking points.
I certainly have my theories / views / opinions, but wanted to see what this fren thought / meant.
I agree; Bldg. 7 seems impossible....
I just ran across this video (posted ~Sept. 2023) and found it fascinating, regarding the twin towers:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1NkBfLBov5Q
To clarify, I do not think the events were completely fake, I believe the narrative was fake propaganda and used to gut our constitutional rights in America.
It is highly likely in my opinion that the towers that fell that day were taken down by planned demolition, and not due to the aluminum planes hitting steel and concrete towers.
Here are examples of building demolitions.
Building Number 7 "collapsed" yet was never hit by airplanes. Why is that?
Here is one source, but it's best to look at many sources and make up your own mind. I would suggest searching yandex.com and not gaggle, duckruckgo, or any other search engines as they are all designed to hide the truth.
Got it & definitely agree; events like that are ALWAYS used to justify & ram through laws that would otherwise never have a chance of passing.
Never let a crisis go to waste.....and if there isn't a crisis, create one......
I happened across this video recently (it was uploaded ~sept. 2023) and found it fascinating:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1NkBfLBov5Q
It gave some good scientific / engineering nfo as to how & why the buildings collapsed; assuming you believe the mainstream narrative.
I just honestly don't know what to believe, TBH. I haven't done enough in-depth & detailed research to come to a firm conclusion.
I absolutely don't trust the government at all, but that should be a given around here.
I have seen the security camera footage from the pentagon that absolutely, undeniably shows a cruise missile hitting it, so that's not in question. Or rather; the object that appears for a split second is objectively NOT anywhere near the size of a commercial airliner.
ETA: Here's the footage I'm talking about: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0SL2PzzOiF8
Whatever TF that was, it was flying mere feet above the ground, and in no way appears to be even half as large as a commercial passenger airliner.
Is it true that they didn't find any significant aircraft debris at the pentagon?
There is definitely a lot they are hiding, and you never hide the truth for good reasons.
All great additional thoughts, u/SvixGale ππ»
There was a joke running around during the plandemic that turned out to be quite prescient.
Q: What's the difference between a Conspiracy Theory and a Fact?
A: About 6 months.
It seems the Delta is much shorter now. Time speeds up as the truth intervenes.
Due to so many "conspiracy theories" turning out to be true, it has certainly made me wonder and want to examine so much of history that I once thought I knew for certain.
Some examples to consider:
Was Pearl Harbor really caught completely off guard? Who was desperate to get the USA into WWII? Who wanted to stay out of war at all costs? I think Churchill and Roosevelt wanted to get in, and I think the American people were hell-bent against it, with the recent memories of WWI still in their contemporary experience.
Was Watergate really as history explains it? Or was the IC involved via infiltration in the affair and reporting? Are Woodward & Bernstein actually spooks?
What about the moon landing? We went over 50 years ago but can't seem to figure out how to get back? All of the original plans and equipment were destroyed? Really?
Honestly, we could probably look at nearly every major world event in history, especially modern history, and consider questioning it all. I am not disposed to throw everything out and assume it is all wrong, but we are all too well aware of how much the media lies.
Want to know the truth in the news?
Start by believing the opposite. You'll be 95% of the way there.
Fake narrative not fake destruction
Gotcha, Thanks
TBH, it was not fake. But like Pearl Harbor, the U.S. Gov't knew and may even have made it happen. Peal Harbor was needed to bring Congress into Wolrd War II. The United States was not interested in getting involved in a war that had little to do with us in Europe. However, once Japan attacked Pear Harbor, it brought the U.S. into the war. And the U.S. brought the war to an end. And made Japna pay a heavy price for attacking Pearl Harbor.
As I remember the terrorists who got the flight training were known to the FBI. Back then I thought it was bureaucratic incompetence. With what we know about the FBI now, it is more likely that the FBI instigated or helped the terrorists.
Cue the Bart Simpson meme
Rest of class and teacher: say the line!
Reluctant Bart: the suspect was known to the FBI
Funny you say that; start paying closer attention and go back & look at prior mass shootings yourself; Virtually EVERY single "mass shooting" in history (esp. the past ~20-30 years) almost without fail, each & every suspect had been "known to the FBI."
Almost each & every one.
How much "bureaucratic incompetence" does it take before it becomes intentionall?
Inside job aka