It's all that newfangled technology they have nowadays.
They need to go back to their pocket calculators, pencils, construction paper and tin foil. That never failed them before.
By all means head over to conspiracies.win to talk about it. Here at GreatAwakening.win we are about the great awakening, but we're working within the Q posts, as such, and as Q post 2225 points out, "moon landings are real"
Moon landings are real.
Does Q ever say THE MOON LANDING was real? You know, the one with people on board. The one we lost the technology for…
Do you even read Q?
Lol….
Bro, you made the assertion that Q had said moon landings were real. Therefore calling the moon landing a hoax belonged in conspiracy talk.
I’m pointing out to you that Q did not say “THE MOON LANDING” the entire world knows about was real. Could have said it right there. Didn’t. Doesn’t mean he was saying it WAS a hoax either…
Q was extremely careful in all of his language. Words have meanings. Missing letters have meanings, etc etc etc. Captain Obvious here…
A big part of many people waking up to the entire facade of reality that has been constructed around all of us for decades now, has been the ridiculous holes in the moon landing story. I don’t agree at all that it should only be relegated to conspiracy. Q didn’t say it happened. He just said moon landings are real. Manned? Or just unmanned? Possible in 1960’s?
Wouldnt most people here agree that Q’s biggest mission was to get people to ask questions. Investigate. Research. Learn?
Is DS perpetrating 911 on America relegated to conspiracy/win also?
Human cargo is a little more perishable than sensors and machinery, so it necessitates a faster trip, even if it requires a bigger rocket to do it faster. If you don't have flesh and blood that you want alive, there and back, taking your time usually results in much less expensive missions.
Limited fuel means slower approach-however, the vibrations of takeoff damaged fuel system-righty-tighty, lefty loosey enters the chat loss of fuel critical..
Who cares. Its a "lander" the size of a commercial washing machine, that doesn't lift off the moon. Its just a little cabinet full of tinkertoy experiments. China put a lander down a couple years ago. Even fucking India has landed on the moon. Japan almost did. It will be like climbing Everest soon.
Wake me up when its a full-on man-rated lander and return mission.
More likely: a distinct lack of boring old white guy engineers who actually know what the fuck they are doing. At least ULA didn't drop the ball, although they probably held their breath the whole time Bezo's engines were running.
Fishy language. I couldn't tell anything divisive from the article. The article did elaborate on how many private companies are now in the space launch business. New frontiers or gaslighting? Any ideas?
It's all that newfangled technology they have nowadays. They need to go back to their pocket calculators, pencils, construction paper and tin foil. That never failed them before.
The technology doesn't exist anymore!!!
And those eyeglasses.
I have a feeling the truth about "space" is something people just arent ready for.
It's hard to tell. Right now people are so overwhelmed with the economic/political situation that "space" reveals would not be very beneficial.
I found this whole thing fishy.
They blasted off a day or two ago, but said they wouldn't reach the moon until feb. I recall it only took 3 days back in the 60s/70s
Are we allowed to talk now about moon landing hoax in this board without being called retards and banned? Just checking.
Sure, but at conspiracies.win. This is a Q/GA board:
u/#q2225
And GA means Great Awakening…in what empty space in your brain does a possible moon hoax not exactly correlate to GA.
It absolutely does.
By all means head over to conspiracies.win to talk about it. Here at GreatAwakening.win we are about the great awakening, but we're working within the Q posts, as such, and as Q post 2225 points out, "moon landings are real"
Moon landings are real. Does Q ever say THE MOON LANDING was real? You know, the one with people on board. The one we lost the technology for… Do you even read Q?
Do you? Go find the post that implies the moon landing was fake.
Lol…. Bro, you made the assertion that Q had said moon landings were real. Therefore calling the moon landing a hoax belonged in conspiracy talk.
I’m pointing out to you that Q did not say “THE MOON LANDING” the entire world knows about was real. Could have said it right there. Didn’t. Doesn’t mean he was saying it WAS a hoax either…
Q was extremely careful in all of his language. Words have meanings. Missing letters have meanings, etc etc etc. Captain Obvious here…
A big part of many people waking up to the entire facade of reality that has been constructed around all of us for decades now, has been the ridiculous holes in the moon landing story. I don’t agree at all that it should only be relegated to conspiracy. Q didn’t say it happened. He just said moon landings are real. Manned? Or just unmanned? Possible in 1960’s?
Wouldnt most people here agree that Q’s biggest mission was to get people to ask questions. Investigate. Research. Learn? Is DS perpetrating 911 on America relegated to conspiracy/win also?
True...very fishy.
Human cargo is a little more perishable than sensors and machinery, so it necessitates a faster trip, even if it requires a bigger rocket to do it faster. If you don't have flesh and blood that you want alive, there and back, taking your time usually results in much less expensive missions.
i guess that is a reasonable take to quell some of the fishiness.
Limited fuel means slower approach-however, the vibrations of takeoff damaged fuel system-righty-tighty, lefty loosey enters the chat loss of fuel critical..
Who cares. Its a "lander" the size of a commercial washing machine, that doesn't lift off the moon. Its just a little cabinet full of tinkertoy experiments. China put a lander down a couple years ago. Even fucking India has landed on the moon. Japan almost did. It will be like climbing Everest soon.
Wake me up when its a full-on man-rated lander and return mission.
Lol...ok.
Could be a problem w/ firmament or radiation belt , but who am I other than a Conspiracy Theorist .
More likely: a distinct lack of boring old white guy engineers who actually know what the fuck they are doing. At least ULA didn't drop the ball, although they probably held their breath the whole time Bezo's engines were running.
Its actually just more space junk. Companies should be responsible for retrieving them as part of their launchh authorization.
Such a grift
The first moon landing 55 years ago appeared to be successful...APPEARED.
Fishy language. I couldn't tell anything divisive from the article. The article did elaborate on how many private companies are now in the space launch business. New frontiers or gaslighting? Any ideas?
This is an interesting development. reprise next month ...