Or, sorry druggie, I’m not up to doing needles with you. If that means I can’t hang out with the cool kids, then I do not want to hang out with the cool kids because you guys are fucked up.
No, Rancourt and colleagues consistently both debunk the millions saved and estimate 17 million killed. Their 17 mill is a legit estimate based on analysis of countries in the Southern hemisphere. Of course there have been efforts to discredit their work, but not successfully IMO.
I wouldn’t believe NIH, LANCET or MEDSCAPE documents at all. Lancet destroyed their reputation by not properly vetting “professional” articles, and we know how the government lies and twists.
We don't, but we have to convince normies the same, and we cant just say "Dont believe these publications". You gotta analyse it for them within their own "scientific belief system" (for the lack of a better term)
the point is the normies do believe in those institutions. so use their own "tool" of "enlightenment" on them.
they either will accept and slowly begin to see reason, or they will outright reject any evidence - even if it comes from sources they'd trust. At which point they're hopelessly programmed beyond anything one could do to snap them out of it
https://nitter.net/JoshWalkos/status/1744794158735245749#m
That's a lot of good info, thanks for posting.
Thanks for posting the Nitter link for those who don't identify as Xer / Xim :)
Kek
Well then line up to get your 8th Covid booster.
Do you know how we win our argument with druggies?
We just wait.
😆
Druggies? I've never before seen that term applied to people taking medical drugs - only the criminal/recreational kind.
I call them vaxophiles.
Druggies, junkies, they are totally hooked on injectable drugs.
Vaxophile is accurate, but just isn’t as emotionally laden and jarring as calling them a junkie that’s sweating for their next fix.
Or, sorry druggie, I’m not up to doing needles with you. If that means I can’t hang out with the cool kids, then I do not want to hang out with the cool kids because you guys are fucked up.
Errr, Josh Walkos just goes ad hominem and points out obvious conflicts of interest. Relevant but...
Much stronger are formal critiques and absurdities of the models that claim millions of lives saved, e.g. https://correlation-canada.org/nobel-vaccine-and-all-cause-mortality/ from Hickey and Rancourt--who are the ones who estimate 17 million killed.
This is one of the sharpest contradictions I've ever seen in scientific publications.
Wait, the same guys who claimed millions saved also are the ones claiming 17 million killed?
BTW, I have always felt that 17 million number was a troll to get people talking, but didnt realise it was the same folks.
I guess in the end we will see that depending on who pays them, they can give whatever result you need.
No, Rancourt and colleagues consistently both debunk the millions saved and estimate 17 million killed. Their 17 mill is a legit estimate based on analysis of countries in the Southern hemisphere. Of course there have been efforts to discredit their work, but not successfully IMO.
Okay thanks for this
I wouldn’t believe NIH, LANCET or MEDSCAPE documents at all. Lancet destroyed their reputation by not properly vetting “professional” articles, and we know how the government lies and twists.
We don't, but we have to convince normies the same, and we cant just say "Dont believe these publications". You gotta analyse it for them within their own "scientific belief system" (for the lack of a better term)
the point is the normies do believe in those institutions. so use their own "tool" of "enlightenment" on them.
they either will accept and slowly begin to see reason, or they will outright reject any evidence - even if it comes from sources they'd trust. At which point they're hopelessly programmed beyond anything one could do to snap them out of it
“(big sigh)”
…what a completely emasculated faggot.