The claim that we own GameStop was made from calculations done on the number of shares that are held by the public v. the total number of shares. That the Apes "own" GME is true, from the perspective of legally purchased shares, which was the explicitly stated context in which it was said.
Obviously there is still fuckery in the closing of short sales and hiding the orders in dark pool ETFs. That's really the whole point of everything that is still going on. That is implicit within everything I said.
Well, there goes that one guy's whole writeup, then.
That was just a tiny part of the first section of the write up. It has nothing to do with the primary thesis of the report.
Everything I said is still relevant and was and is correct in the context in which I said it. Worse, suggesting that the statement that "we own it" was a premise or important point misses pretty much everything I said. Stating that the report is "old DD," implying it is false or irrelevant also completely misses everything I said.
There is nothing worse than being mischaracterized. I feel like I've been attacked by Fake News. :)
GameStop?
Yes and a bunch of others. The finitial criminal Ken Griffith has 65 billion of securities sold not yet purchesed.
Well, there goes that one guy's whole writeup, then.
Claiming that "we own it" (GameStop).
The claim that we own GameStop was made from calculations done on the number of shares that are held by the public v. the total number of shares. That the Apes "own" GME is true, from the perspective of legally purchased shares, which was the explicitly stated context in which it was said.
Obviously there is still fuckery in the closing of short sales and hiding the orders in dark pool ETFs. That's really the whole point of everything that is still going on. That is implicit within everything I said.
That was just a tiny part of the first section of the write up. It has nothing to do with the primary thesis of the report.
I lived in vegas for 8 years, the house has the odds stacked. Banks, stocks all of it.
That's some old superstonk DD.
here is the complet library if anyone has a week to read it.
https://fliphtml5.com/bookcase/kosyg
Everything I said is still relevant and was and is correct in the context in which I said it. Worse, suggesting that the statement that "we own it" was a premise or important point misses pretty much everything I said. Stating that the report is "old DD," implying it is false or irrelevant also completely misses everything I said.
There is nothing worse than being mischaracterized. I feel like I've been attacked by Fake News. :)
A guy claiming to be the author posts here. Goes by u/Slyver. Take it up with him.
So is it real or not? Did I waste my money buying one share of GME?
Fail to deliver.