Australian court rules: Employers that mandated COVID-19 injections for workers can be held LIABLE for vaccine injuries. Feb 12th, 2024.
(www.naturalnews.com)
🏆 - WINNING - 🏆
Comments (25)
sorted by:
This is exactly why it was a catch 22 for businesses to follow the mandates. The government will always mandate stuff, but you as the employer will always be held liable in the end. Suing the government is as effective as pissing into the wind.
Better to side with your employees over the government.
Your employees (in theory) vote for the government. If they survive and the people pushing mandates die, then the numbers rise against the people mandating.
Source
https://www.naturalnews.com/2024-02-12-employers-mandated-covid-vaccines-workers-liable-injuries.html
https://archive.is/SQuGT
https://web.archive.org/web/20240214024936/https://www.naturalnews.com/2024-02-12-employers-mandated-covid-vaccines-workers-liable-injuries.html
https://www.lifesitenews.com/analysis/south-australian-court-rules-employers-who-mandated-covid-jabs-can-be-held-liable-for-injuries/
https://archive.is/9PNWl
https://web.archive.org/web/20240215105224/https://www.lifesitenews.com/analysis/south-australian-court-rules-employers-who-mandated-covid-jabs-can-be-held-liable-for-injuries/
Tribunal's official website at https://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/sa/SAET/2024/2.html
https://archive.ph/RxZmF
https://web.archive.org/web/20240209213602/https://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/sa/SAET/2024/2.html
https://assets.lifesitenews.com/analysis/south-australian-court-rules-employers-who-mandated-covid-jabs-can-be-held-liable-for-injuries/
https://archive.ph/d1RUm
https://web.archive.org/web/20240216015809/https://assets.lifesitenews.com/analysis/south-australian-court-rules-employers-who-mandated-covid-jabs-can-be-held-liable-for-injuries/
https://pravda-en.com/world/2024/02/14/319309.html
https://archive.ph/32sFp
https://web.archive.org/web/20240216015853/https://pravda-en.com/world/2024/02/14/319309.html
https://www.bitchute.com/video/0rSKs1G0KHPn/
Related Source
Behind a paywall https://www.theepochtimes.com/world/australian-employer-ordered-to-pay-compensation-for-vaccine-injured-in-significant-precedent-5579036
Related GA Publication
https://greatawakening.win/p/17sOxE7M6b/90-scotus-ruling-opens-the-flood/c/
Excellent write up.
Note: I think the Epoch article is NOT behind a paywall.
But don't forget many are still unemployed because "no jab no job" FARK!!! 🤦🤮🤬🤬🤬🤬🖕🖕 YEAH just a little triggered by this topic. Total hate towards our government 🖕🖕
I prefer the headline "Whole Government sent to jail for mandating vax. Big Pharma to follow suit."
u/#mjpopcorn
Another form to divide the people and drive businesses out of business. Kind of reminds me of Trading Places with Eddy Murphy and Dan Ackroyd.
the key is proving it’s a vax injury… I’m glad to see the ball is rolling though
According to many doctors, the best way to prove a vax injury is to do a D-dimer before and after taking any vax.
For those not familiar with D-dimer. "D-dimer concentration may be determined by a blood test". Source at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/D-dimer
There are many other ways to prove vax injury. I suggest asking your lawyer. I suggest choosing one which is WITHOUT conflict of interest with big pharma.
Speaking as an employer, this sucks. I didn't mandate and fought the pressures for injections from my employees. But like how much knowledge is an employer expected to contain? I call employer anyone who has more good paying work to do than they can personally handle, so they hire someone else to help get the work done. That doesn't make them brilliant or a top notch lawyer, just someone with more to do than they can handle. Employer should be a simple occupation.
If you didn’t mandate your employees to get a experimental gene therapy, why would this bother you?
Your obviously not an employer. We worry bout everything.
I think your comment points to the reality that legalism in the form of statute law has gone rampant and out of control.
in common law, liability only pertains when you cause harm. But the so-called 'elites', who run the world from banks and use the legal system to subvert actual law, have made it extremely hard, if not impossible, for small businesses to manage all the liabilities that can potentially get thrown at them. It's not an issue for the massive corporations and owned subsidiaries, etc, because they will have endless funds and teams of lawyers to protect themselves and worm their way through all the traps, but smaller businesses simply cannot do that.
In other words, the system is rigged as much against small businesses - and small business owners / employers - as it is against the general population.
I think however, in this case, the exposure of the employers is completely justified. It sucks, indeed, if smaller employers get caught in the crossfire, but this situation and the crimes behind it all MUST be exposed.
Note that in this particular case, it was a GOVERNMENT AGENCY that forced the injuries.
South Australian Department of Child Protection (DCP)
This outcome will impact bigger and more corrupt elements of the system than it will the smaller, imo.
Thanks so much for your deeper understanding. My words were no so well thought out. The split within the firm whether to vax or not is something that never healed. It goes undiscussed, we muddle along getting the work done.
I hadn't realized this action was falling first on a government agency and the DCP specifically. That's ironic.
While I am not an employer, I still have to disagree. It’s completely justified. I almost had to leave my company due to mandates, and instead they just chose to discriminate against me and give me my own set of rules I had to follow as an “unvaccinated.” Essentially I was alienated. My family relies on me to put food on the table and I was having to weigh many options and it was pretty darn stressful.
But back to the point, if you mandated the experimental jabs to your employees, know how hard it was to find stable employment during that time, plus all the external pressures others felt - you deserve to be liable to any damages that occurred. If your hands are clean, then you should be proud you held the line and your employees should be proud to work for you.
It happened to me also. We didn't mandate anything but did socially distance and mask up for I can't remember how long. Thank God it's relaxing.
Yep, many of the businesses, small and large were patrolled by our local police and fines if they didn’t enact social distancing and masking requirements. I was calling the police stormtroopers. But this whole scenario has put my family on a beautiful path where we are now purchasing a homestead and will be producing our own food on a family farm.
Maybe the employers can sue their government. In turn, maybe their government can sue big pharma. In turn, maybe big pharma can sue their secret shareholders.
Only the Lawyers win that one.
Interestingly enough, a reading of the case seems to indicate that if the employer didn't require the jab but simply made notice of the gov mandate they might have avoided this. But the employer was all in on throwing this into their employment agreement. That's the sticky wicket that hoisted the employer on his own petard.
What about here . In USA we plenty who mandated the kill shot
That's rich. Essentially force companies to mandate , and then hang them out to dry. So many ways to wreck an economy.
The Australian lockdowns were so strict (in closing the borders between territories and putting people in cv camps). I was concerned for the people and that it would spread as a “best practice”. Now their courts are leading the way on cv violations! It’s impressive the way they have stepped it up and a testament to the resistance of the people!🇦🇺
let the games begin...........