Note: This has the rare footage of the British newscast where they announce the WTC 7 building collapse 20 minutes before it actually happens. WTC 7 can be seen in the background.
There are a ton of proofs for WTC7 (pentagon missing money investigation papers destroyed!), but the BBC thing was proven that they were using stock footage, not live footage. The BBC reporter wasn't actually on site, but using a green screen as is the case a lot of the time. They were using previously recorded footage for the green screen.
The videos also clearly show controlled demolitions (I have not looked the video from jimmy dore yet) There are explosions at the various floors in a controlled pattern.
I disagree, every building that was hit, especially WTC 1and 2 were hit directly where important information was held, (and WTC7) all housed either data like the DoD missing trillions, BCCI scandal, Enron scandal, and many more. I believe flight 93 was destined to hit WTC7 but the remote takeover software failed so they had to use the back up of a controlled demo instead.
Yeah I had always wondered what the fourth plane was supposed to hit. Pentagon was clearly a missile and I believe the first two planes to be cover for the pre-planted explosives. It was weird that for Building 7 they just went "fuck it, we'll do it live" and imploded it without anything hitting it.
Back in the wild west of YT before all the BS censorship, I watched an avionics software engineer who spent years working with CVR's and data recorders (black boxes) examine the data from one of the aircraft used in 9/11. When he examined the so called official data, handed over by the US Gov, he could instantly see it was BS and not from one of the aircraft but a test bed black box.
One of the things he stated was every door into the cockpit has a microswitch fitted, and every time it is opened and closed it is recorded in the data recorder, what he examined showed the door was never opened in flight!
So many anomaly's it is beyond a joke that the official narrative on that fateful is true imo.
Also worked out for the owner of the building as the asbestos remediation would have cost a fortune, so instead they got a massive insurance payout for their compliance.
Pretty sure he still believes in wealth re-distribution, but he is one the best sauce distributors on the net. Don't always agree with Mate` either but his sauce is almost always legit too.
Jimmy Dore wants universal healthcare. As a Conservative that sounds bad, but his point is that compared to all of the spending on Ukraine, such healthcare is nothing. Considering how much money is wasted on fake wars for the benefit of banksters, they could easily provide universal healthcare and pay for everyone's kids to get braces and such.
And on this I completely agree. It is something this whole journey has convnviced me of. We pay in more than enough to feed and home everyone already if the corruption is removed.
But another thing I have learned is that social programs that force you to pay in to help others, attract the corrupt like sharks to blood. I will forever be cautious.....
The principal conclusion of our study is that fire did not cause the collapse of WTC 7 on 9/11, contrary to the conclusions of NIST and private engineering firms that studied the collapse. The secondary conclusion of our study is that the collapse of WTC 7 was a global failure involving the near-simultaneous failure of every column in the building.
a global failure involving the near-simultaneous failure of every column in the building. - i can only speculate that the leading theory that caused that is Controlled Demolition.
And even if the fire could cause it to collapse a hit and fire near the top of the tower would not have caused it to implode like that! Most of the tower would still be standing while the upper floors fell apart.
The whole support infrastructure was, by building code, covered in a masonry cement to protect it from high heat. There is no other structure that has caught fire and burned that produced molten steel let alone multiple support column failure like this setup.
WTC 1 and 2 - there are pictures and videos that were taken before cleanup that clearly show the main support columns clearly cut at an angle. No way in hell that they were sheared off damaged in the way shown in the pictures. If you have watched controlled demolitions and shape charges. Zero doubt in my mind of the truth.
E-Team = Possibly referring to Explosive-Team? Likely the team that was in charge of the nano-solgel addition (patented paint-on nano-thermate) to the buildings, mainly targeting the 47 core columns at impact point (initiation), the interior core columns (every 6 floors), and the corner sections (every 12-15 floors) and once done they lit up the entire impact zone with their name E-TEAM to make sure it was perfectly lined up inside/outside)
Then the actual explosives for the impact zone visuals and the outer core column charges were likely added over an ~5 day period starting on Sept 6, 2001 (which just so happens to be the day that "bomb-sniffing dogs were abruptly removed", a large amount of "telecom upgrades" were being done throughout the buildings (which is why the occupancy in the towers was so low, a lot of occupants had Mon/Tues off), and a series of "powerouts" took place over huge sections of each tower (related to the telecom upgrades)).
https://peakd.com/conspiracy/@budz82/9-11-and-the-israeli-bomb-expert-infiltrated-art-groups-gelatin-demo-wiring-team-and-e-team-sol-gel-team
Patience 47.........if all of this was done by the CIA, how can they be stopped now before they take out the top MAGA people? OR have they already been taken out?
Note: This has the rare footage of the British newscast where they announce the WTC 7 building collapse 20 minutes before it actually happens. WTC 7 can be seen in the background.
Yes you are correct.
There are a ton of proofs for WTC7 (pentagon missing money investigation papers destroyed!), but the BBC thing was proven that they were using stock footage, not live footage. The BBC reporter wasn't actually on site, but using a green screen as is the case a lot of the time. They were using previously recorded footage for the green screen.
The videos also clearly show controlled demolitions (I have not looked the video from jimmy dore yet) There are explosions at the various floors in a controlled pattern.
Public Trial - Public Executions.
Building 7 was the real target to destroy what was held in it. WTC 1-2 were distractions.
I disagree, every building that was hit, especially WTC 1and 2 were hit directly where important information was held, (and WTC7) all housed either data like the DoD missing trillions, BCCI scandal, Enron scandal, and many more. I believe flight 93 was destined to hit WTC7 but the remote takeover software failed so they had to use the back up of a controlled demo instead.
Yeah I had always wondered what the fourth plane was supposed to hit. Pentagon was clearly a missile and I believe the first two planes to be cover for the pre-planted explosives. It was weird that for Building 7 they just went "fuck it, we'll do it live" and imploded it without anything hitting it.
Back in the wild west of YT before all the BS censorship, I watched an avionics software engineer who spent years working with CVR's and data recorders (black boxes) examine the data from one of the aircraft used in 9/11. When he examined the so called official data, handed over by the US Gov, he could instantly see it was BS and not from one of the aircraft but a test bed black box.
One of the things he stated was every door into the cockpit has a microswitch fitted, and every time it is opened and closed it is recorded in the data recorder, what he examined showed the door was never opened in flight!
So many anomaly's it is beyond a joke that the official narrative on that fateful is true imo.
I think they wanted all those building down because what was in them they wanted total destruction nothing left to find.
Also worked out for the owner of the building as the asbestos remediation would have cost a fortune, so instead they got a massive insurance payout for their compliance.
Dr Hulsey did not kill himself.
Jimmy Dore might as well be an anon. The only point that we differ on with him is Trump, as far as I can tell
Pretty sure he still believes in wealth re-distribution, but he is one the best sauce distributors on the net. Don't always agree with Mate` either but his sauce is almost always legit too.
Jimmy Dore wants universal healthcare. As a Conservative that sounds bad, but his point is that compared to all of the spending on Ukraine, such healthcare is nothing. Considering how much money is wasted on fake wars for the benefit of banksters, they could easily provide universal healthcare and pay for everyone's kids to get braces and such.
Destruction of the corrupt medical system would be better. Mutual Aid societies and charity could do the rest if we came back to God.
I agree!
And on this I completely agree. It is something this whole journey has convnviced me of. We pay in more than enough to feed and home everyone already if the corruption is removed.
But another thing I have learned is that social programs that force you to pay in to help others, attract the corrupt like sharks to blood. I will forever be cautious.....
The UAF INE report has been out for a long time.
The long and short is this:
The NIST stated fire caused the building to collapse. The findings found that fire could not have caused it to collapse.
http://ine.uaf.edu/wtc7
a global failure involving the near-simultaneous failure of every column in the building. - i can only speculate that the leading theory that caused that is Controlled Demolition.
yeah their excuse is falling debris. just looking at the vid it's so obvious.
Yep it sure has been: "The UAF INE report has been out for a long time."
And even if the fire could cause it to collapse a hit and fire near the top of the tower would not have caused it to implode like that! Most of the tower would still be standing while the upper floors fell apart.
The whole support infrastructure was, by building code, covered in a masonry cement to protect it from high heat. There is no other structure that has caught fire and burned that produced molten steel let alone multiple support column failure like this setup.
WTC 1 and 2 - there are pictures and videos that were taken before cleanup that clearly show the main support columns clearly cut at an angle. No way in hell that they were sheared off damaged in the way shown in the pictures. If you have watched controlled demolitions and shape charges. Zero doubt in my mind of the truth.
Public Trials Public Executions.
E-Team = Possibly referring to Explosive-Team? Likely the team that was in charge of the nano-solgel addition (patented paint-on nano-thermate) to the buildings, mainly targeting the 47 core columns at impact point (initiation), the interior core columns (every 6 floors), and the corner sections (every 12-15 floors) and once done they lit up the entire impact zone with their name E-TEAM to make sure it was perfectly lined up inside/outside) Then the actual explosives for the impact zone visuals and the outer core column charges were likely added over an ~5 day period starting on Sept 6, 2001 (which just so happens to be the day that "bomb-sniffing dogs were abruptly removed", a large amount of "telecom upgrades" were being done throughout the buildings (which is why the occupancy in the towers was so low, a lot of occupants had Mon/Tues off), and a series of "powerouts" took place over huge sections of each tower (related to the telecom upgrades)). https://peakd.com/conspiracy/@budz82/9-11-and-the-israeli-bomb-expert-infiltrated-art-groups-gelatin-demo-wiring-team-and-e-team-sol-gel-team
This was well worth my Sunday time. I want the truth and I want everyone involved to pay for what they did.
WTC 7 - CIA? JFK - CIA? WEAVERS(Ruby Ridge) - CIA? SETH RICH - CIA? NAVALNY - CIA?
Patience 47.........if all of this was done by the CIA, how can they be stopped now before they take out the top MAGA people? OR have they already been taken out?
RELEVANT: https://youtu.be/IAgi4Z5ImRU
The building being "brought down" is controlled opposition - they want you to debate between "terrorists" and "thermite" or whatever.
Hardly anyone mentions Judy Wood and DEW, which is the only plausible explanation for the debris post-collapse.
Anytime a youtuber (even if I've liked them in the past) mentions controlled demolition with TNT or Thermite - I cannot trust them anymore.
I live in Alaska it’s a purple state going blue, politicians are corrupt both parties that said lots of gun owners that are fed up