Exclusive -- Trump Lawyer Alina Habba on NY Ruling: I Will Respond in Appeal and 'You Can Read It and Weep'
Trump lawyer Alina Habba told Breitbart News Daily that she will “thoughtfully” and “methodically” respond to the ruling in New York’s fraud case against former President Donald Trump, stating that it is “going to be on the appeal” and “you can read it and...
Dear God please be with these attorneys and Trump to make sure a REAL judge will fix what is broken from these injust rulings.
In your sons name Jesus Christ.
Amen.
I'm not sure how the appeals process works in a civil case, but I thought I saw somewhere the NY Appeals Court is made up entirely of black women.
???
Do you mean the judges?
They are not.
I don't think that's true. But they all are democrat.
Ok, I wasn't sure what court it was.
Nah it's half and half, and two were appointed by John Roberts
John Roberts appointed no one to the "New York Appeals Court"
All appointees have been appointed by the current Governor of NY and who she replaced.
Unless I have the wrong court in mind.
you do
Amen.
Amen
Amen. I am very much anticipating Ms. Habba’s appeal.
but already, the damage is done, as the pension funds are withdrawing billions in investments in NY.
Are they?? What have you heard?
newer post on this board
https://greatawakening.win/p/17sP6WstEX/pension-funds-are-beginning-to-d/
it was a tweet stating
"They still have no idea what they’ve done. What is that sucking sound? I do not want to cause any additional anxiety for my partners but our family office is working on pulling $2B out of NYC as cleanly as possible. A number of pension funds that have already abandoned ESG are now divesting from NY real estate."
Wow....that will have a tremendous impact. Byb bye NYC. Sad.
The country weeps at this injustice. 😪
Trump should personally sue the judge in a federal court. In that case, the judge has to pay for his own defense, and New York is forbidden to immunize him or pay for defense. In particular, the allegations should include that the judge committed acts out of scope.
Where do you get this from?
Government actors get government defense when sued in their official capacity. They don't if they are sued privately for crimes (acting out of scope).
Ex parte Young, 209 U.S. 123 (1908), is a United States Supreme Court case that allows suits in federal courts for injunctions against officials acting on behalf of states of the union to proceed despite the State's sovereign immunity, when the State acted contrary to any federal law or contrary to the Constitution.
OK. What exactly would be the basis for such a lawsuit?
Like realistically? Trump's already spent a chunk of change on lawsuits that got tossed out of court.
I'm sure there is a whole list of violations, including the major one of failing to accurately appraise the value of Mar a Lago, The Winter White House, then using it to cause the defendant to lose. Violation of due process.
The judgement is blatantly political; like the rest of the case. If it not overturned on appeal it will be because the Appeals Court is blatantly political also. Legal repercussions should be forthcoming for all, James and entire staff, on the prosecution side as welll as Engoron. Adverse or illegal acts under the color of law carry harsh punishments.
By applying the ruling's punitive action to his children, they set it up for an easy appeal.
It will look very partisan if they shut that appeal down.
We are praying for that day.
I sure Hope this corrupt judge and prosecutors all will be held accountable, ordered to pay all costs back, and get their asses thrown into Gitmo!
Absolutely ^^^ has to be done 👍