Cite one Q post that discusses adrenochrome? You can't find one but it's discussed on here all the time. There's a lot of things Q hasn't openly discussed, actually most things. Although he has alluded to some things, see my Q drops above where he says; SKY_BEAM_OK -- NORTH_TRADE_OK -- MOUNTAIN_DEEP_OK. That drop was just before the North Korean nuke research facility located deep inside a mountain just blew up.
Looks like you don't believe in energy weapons and you don't want them talked about here. Personally I know they exist, we've had them on ships and planes for a while. Whether there's one in orbit I don't know but discussing it on here is not very far fetched.
Developed under a 2018 contract with Lockheed, the HELIOS consists of a 60-kilowatt laser and optical dazzler package designed to knock out unmanned aerial vehicles, “burn the boats”
I'm sorry to start this reply with such a negative tone, frog, but, this is such basic level research and frankly rather embarrassing to even read for someone that well understands these Systems. My goodness gracious this is some weak logic. For instance:
The Navy has now taken possession of a half-dozen new laser weapons for integration onto surface warships, officials said on Wednesday.
The HELIOS program is a ship based "point defense" system, not a space-based green laser. "yEaH, bUt tHeY CoUlD PuT It iN SpAcE" — OK, then explain how it was was installed into the 16-foot wide payload bay and launched on the Delta IV Heavy rocket, which has a max payload of 28,000 KG??
Bring that here to this WIN and I'll sticky it. And make you a mod.
You know that the bulk of the HELIOS system is its massive cooling system, right? Detecting an object this hot in space would a pretty simple matter using an infrared (IR) telescope or sensor capable of picking up thermal emissions from high altitudes. Amateur ground astronomers would simply scan the sky for over-flies of extremely hot objects, then extrapolate and track the satellite's orbit to predict its path across the sky for targeted observation. And yet we have no photos of this? Why? And with no evidence, you believe there are platforms in orbit that can burn small communities undetected??
The US Air Force airborne laser, (ABL), designated YAL-1A, is a high-energy laser weapon system.
How are you even citing this? Every airplane geek knows that this program was a total failure. The Boeing 747 is now sitting abandoned and almost totally dismantled in the "Boneyard," at Davis-Monthan Air Force Base in Tucson, Arizona.
About the program, from the AI (and I know these things before I go to the AI, BTW, I just tell it what to research and how long I want the results to be to save me typing):
The US Air Force's Airborne Laser (ABL), designated YAL-1A, was an ambitious high-energy laser weapon system mounted on a modified Boeing 747. Designed to intercept and destroy tactical ballistic missiles at long ranges using a powerful laser, the ABL took on a significant challenge in directed energy weapons technology. Despite its innovative approach and the successful demonstration of its capabilities in tests, however, the ABL program faced significant challenges related to feasibility, cost-effectiveness, and operational practicality. Ultimately, these challenges led to the discontinuation of the program, and the program was deemed a failure.
Despite demonstrating the ability to shoot down missiles in tests, the program could not overcome the significant challenges associated with operational deployment, including the laser's range, atmospheric conditions affecting laser performance, and the high costs of operation and maintenance. As a result, the U.S. Department of Defense decided to discontinue the ABL program, redirecting its focus and resources towards more feasible missile defense solutions.
They couldn't get it to work. And yet we're supposed to believe they have orbiting platforms that can vaporize small towns, and NO ONE in this entire thread has posted anything even close to that.
I get their sentiment, it's reasonable. But doing something like this and the discourse/division that follows is going to give more fuel to the perps than the topic of DEWs by itself
Your name checks out.
Q references terrorists in many posts.
Q post 4354 discusses ANTIFA as an organized group of domestic terrorists.
u/#q4354
. . . and again in post 4644
u/#q4644
Cite one Q post that discusses space lasers.
Cite one Q post that discusses adrenochrome? You can't find one but it's discussed on here all the time. There's a lot of things Q hasn't openly discussed, actually most things. Although he has alluded to some things, see my Q drops above where he says; SKY_BEAM_OK -- NORTH_TRADE_OK -- MOUNTAIN_DEEP_OK. That drop was just before the North Korean nuke research facility located deep inside a mountain just blew up.
Looks like you don't believe in energy weapons and you don't want them talked about here. Personally I know they exist, we've had them on ships and planes for a while. Whether there's one in orbit I don't know but discussing it on here is not very far fetched.
https://www.lockheedmartin.com/en-us/capabilities/directed-energy.html
The US Air Force airborne laser, (ABL), designated YAL-1A, is a high-energy laser weapon system.
The Navy has now taken possession of a half-dozen new laser weapons for integration onto surface warships, officials said on Wednesday.
I'm sorry to start this reply with such a negative tone, frog, but, this is such basic level research and frankly rather embarrassing to even read for someone that well understands these Systems. My goodness gracious this is some weak logic. For instance:
The HELIOS program is a ship based "point defense" system, not a space-based green laser. "yEaH, bUt tHeY CoUlD PuT It iN SpAcE" — OK, then explain how it was was installed into the 16-foot wide payload bay and launched on the Delta IV Heavy rocket, which has a max payload of 28,000 KG??
Bring that here to this WIN and I'll sticky it. And make you a mod.
You know that the bulk of the HELIOS system is its massive cooling system, right? Detecting an object this hot in space would a pretty simple matter using an infrared (IR) telescope or sensor capable of picking up thermal emissions from high altitudes. Amateur ground astronomers would simply scan the sky for over-flies of extremely hot objects, then extrapolate and track the satellite's orbit to predict its path across the sky for targeted observation. And yet we have no photos of this? Why? And with no evidence, you believe there are platforms in orbit that can burn small communities undetected??
How are you even citing this? Every airplane geek knows that this program was a total failure. The Boeing 747 is now sitting abandoned and almost totally dismantled in the "Boneyard," at Davis-Monthan Air Force Base in Tucson, Arizona.
About the program, from the AI (and I know these things before I go to the AI, BTW, I just tell it what to research and how long I want the results to be to save me typing):
They couldn't get it to work. And yet we're supposed to believe they have orbiting platforms that can vaporize small towns, and NO ONE in this entire thread has posted anything even close to that.
Wow, literally every link you destroyed.
Yeah. Qanaut needs to take a hike.
Now just to be an asshole
Q calls them domestic terrorists he doesn’t my mention them crossing the border.
If you’re going to make a statement and use evidence to back it up it would help if the evidence actually matched the statement you made.
Well, Trump has also referenced terrorists crossing the border so that lines up.
Asshole? No.
Overtly obtuse? Yes.
u/#processing
I think he's trolling ya tbh m8
I get their sentiment, it's reasonable. But doing something like this and the discourse/division that follows is going to give more fuel to the perps than the topic of DEWs by itself