An Arizona law requiring voters to show proof of citizenship in order to vote is not discriminatory, a federal judge ruled Thursday
(share.newsbreak.com)
THE WAY IT SHOULD BE!
Comments (20)
sorted by:
Yes!!!! And the judge is absolutely correct! If asking for ID to purchase alcohol and tobacco products isn’t “discriminatory” then neither is asking for ID to vote!
Exactly 💯
They stole an election..wasn't that against the law too?
Yes. Crooked bought off judges would not do anything about it.
All states should copy this. Do it before the next election gets stolen.
I have a feeling the states backing texas will see similar rulings. As long as the key states are secure, the election will be a win. Then the pain for the deep state comes.
It's not discriminatory, it should be common sense.
it is discriminatory. it discriminates between people who are allowed to vote and people who aren't. Anyone who says it's a bad thing to discriminate in this way is not our friend.
Amen, as it should be.
Let's gooooo! 👏👏👏
Now do everything single state. 👍
Winning...
Common sense still exists.
I mean, it should be discriminatory.
Oh, you arent a citizen? Sorry, cant vote.
Mens and womens bathrooms are discriminatory
Excellent point. Who said our country should be the great whore and let everyone screw her at will?
Discrimination is wisdom.
I'm just waiting for someone like FJB or Mayorkissmyass to tell us that voter IDs are contributing to Climate Change. It's early, but it will happen.
Lol....you are probably spot on. 😜
Now, look for that judges decision, just before the election, to get overturned by a leftist judge down the line, who declares that requiring proof of citizenship is unconstitutional.
It's sad that this even needs to be litigated, it should be common knowledge.
I'm thinking there should be a constitutional right for all citizens (at least on reaching legal age) to have ID (free of charge) if they wish.