What happened with his Supreme Court case? Why isn’t it stickied? I thought it would be huge news? I am suspended on X so can’t get in. We have a link to the video?
Comments (24)
sorted by:
So Mike Lindell has exaggerated that it’s game over.
This only proves that the fraud was possible, but it doesn’t prove that the cheating happened.
It’s still not game over yet.
--
EDIT: Interesting thread with u/ToxicLibertyism below. If this is the case - the next steps can be like a game of chess when a good player knows all the moves ahead.
I’m less sceptical now.
I'm starting to wonder if Lindell is just a distraction. There is so much BS I saw with my own eyes, yet he keeps over promising and under delivering.
I tend to agree. I predict that all these "release the Krakens" are designed as misdirection to confuse the cabal as to who has the goods. too many to kill and they're all making empty promises... until it's no longer empty!
Could be.
The original case was dismissed based on what the courts [wrongly] assumed was factual defense testimony that the machines were safe, and properly certified. The case was dismissed on standing, not merit.
This is a separate case from the original filing. The new evidence appears to flatly refute the defense testimony, thus allowing the original case to move forward. The original case is where the rigging evidence comes into play, not this particular case.
I’m very logical person so please read my response from the logical point of view and leave your emotions aside.
If it’s true (assumption) that the original case was dismissed based on standing then presenting additional evidence related to machines doesn’t make sense because … it doesn’t change anything to the lack of standing. He should be presenting the evidence of standing, e.g. adding Trump campaign to the case, or so.
Assuming that an irrefutable evidence of rigging can come into play (meaning: is available) - there is no need for any other case to “unblock” that one and there is no need to present any extra evidence that the rigging is possible because we’ve assumed that there is an evidence of rigging itself.
What Lindell is doing with his new evidence is proving the possibility, e.g. like proving that one day people will be able to go to the Moon.
If the evidence of rigging is available (as you said: it can come to play) - it’s like a video of people already on the Moon. At that point proving that “it’s possible to get there” is pointless.
Unfortunately, that is simply not how legal standing works.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/standing
Take note of point 3; speculative claims.
From what I have been able to gather, the defense asserted that the case should be dismissed because the claims that Lindell's team made- accusing the machines of being faulty (and subject to rigging) were "speculative claims."
Basically, the defense said "look, these machines are tested, and certified, they cannot be rigged impossible! Therefore Lindell is only speculating that rigging happened." The judge agreed with the defense, case dismissed. Evidence of the actual rigging was deemed too "speculative" before it even went to trial.
This new evidence proves that it is not a "speculation" to believe that the machines are in fact vulnerable. And, the machines are now proven vulnerable in specific ways that are contrary to what the defense had [erroneously/falsely] stated in the previous case.
Lindell's team was appealing the standing ruling only with this case, and it appears that they now have irrefutable proof to meet the legal standing criteria.
I like your explanation above.
It really makes now.
Interesting learning. Thank you!
Mike's goal is to get rid of machine voting, it will forward his goal..
You’re a clown
"DEBOONKED"
Oh how I dislike people who jump to that word in something that never even hits courts.
Watch the 5pm WarRoom show, Lindells lawyer explained the case.. https://rumble.com/v4jhyff-new-evidence-emerges.html
They left the unencrypted (plain text) encryption key file open.
That's like leaving your keys to your house hidden under the doormat, and telling the police that there is no way anyone could have used a key to break into your house.
Meanwhile the neighbors called the cops because they saw a stranger in your house, and the inside looks like its been ransacked from a burglary.
So, two things:
I've become hard-jaded to ANY "its gonna be HUGE" precursors that would indicate anything HUGE happening at all as they've all ended in a fizzle. Like this one. Ergo, these things no longer appear on my radar as something to even give attention.
When the narrative changes 180 degrees; i.e. they actually did something huge and THEN let us know the details, I'll perk up again. Example: All the Pedo ring busts that exploded over the last 8 years: They nailed them, then told us they nailed them. Those are actual huge wins to note.
These predictive outcomes that Lindell put out are, and have been, just click bait.
Seems like it
5 hours ago there was a post on X saying it was filed.
https://nitter.poast.org/realMikeLindell/status/1768769736311988693
Supreme Court Case Is Filed! Will Shock The World! Decription Keys Found In The Voting Machines! Check out the filing at (link in X post)
nitter link doesn't seem to work at the moment https://twitter.com/realMikeLindell/status/1768769736311988693
Anything new on this?