6
ToxicLibertyism 6 points ago +6 / -0

...public Safety may require it.

Illegal aliens kill and maim Americans every single day, either by willful intent, or by accident.
There is no question that illegal aliens as a group are objectively a danger to public safety.

2
ToxicLibertyism 2 points ago +2 / -0

Parents are [spy family] CIA. Leftwinglet kid inserts himself into Russian military unit. Who's side was he really on?

-1
ToxicLibertyism -1 points ago +2 / -3

Your first error in your advocating is to assume that the steel in those buildings (beams; and especially bolts) were properly manufactured according to specifications. Fraud exists everywhere, and those shiny "steel" products we all see, and buy, are not immune from being cheap fakes. Fake steel building materials have been around for decades.

That little topic is one that Big Brother doesn't like the proles knowing about.

3
ToxicLibertyism 3 points ago +3 / -0

If you make marriage a requirement, then our tax dollars also get to pay for court costs for ~50%+ who end up divorced. People would just game the marriage system, like they already do now.

1
ToxicLibertyism 1 point ago +1 / -0

The FBI has travel receipt's from decades ago, when they literally sent FBI agents (and other US law enforcement) to El Salvador to learn about who, and what MS-13 was, and how they operated. They did that because they knew the gang came from El Salvador, and they met with Salvadoran law enforcement to teach them [US LEO] how to combat MS-13.

There are records of this to use to humiliate media liars who spread propaganda (and conspire with MS13 terrorists) to deny the fact that MS-13 is a trans-national terrorist organization, originating from El Salvador.

4
ToxicLibertyism 4 points ago +4 / -0

...The mass resignations will effectively shut down the 14-person Defense Digital Service (DDS), which was created in 2015...

🙄

2
ToxicLibertyism 2 points ago +2 / -0

There is a huge pile of documents spanning numerous cases that can, and need to be shown to the public. And, all I see are excuses, or just flat out ignoring questions from the public- what I see is deliberate DoJ obfuscation regarding many cases, not transparency.

A). Tell the public about the cocaine found in the Whitehouse.

-What is the exact quantity of cocaine found in the so-called "baggie?"

-What is it's street value? What is its purity? Was any fentanyl mixed with it?

-Has the perpetrator who brought the "baggie" been identified? Are charges pending against anyone involved (the dope dealer, etc.) with the "baggie?" Has anyone been fired, or arrested for the security failure? Has the "baggie" been linked to foreign, or domestic persons?

Is that too much to ask, dear Pamela? What's the excuse going to be for keeping all of that information hidden from the public?

..:Ok, next. How about the FBI documents regarding the murder of Seth Rich?

B). Let's start with an easy question. Why was the FBI even tasked to investigate an alleged "street mugging" to begin with? That is not normal jurisdiction for the FBI. So, tell us little bit about why the FIB got involved in the first place.

-Could ask lots of questions about this case, obviously....

C). Benghazi? Think the public forgot about that one? Think again. Where is the formal apology from the govt. to YouTuber who was falsely accused (framed) for allegedly inciting a riot, resulting in fatalities? That happened over a decade ago. When does the public get to see the truth about that grotesque fiasco?

If dear Pamela cannot deliver transparency regarding the Epstein case then, maybe she can prove her trustworthiness by providing long hidden information to the public regarding numerous other cases.

The public is long tired of the lies. Dear Pam needs to prove herself, and do it fast, or else we will obliterate our so-called "republican" congressional weaklings during mid-term elections to force election losses. Electoral decimation is a perfectly valid form of punishment, and corrective action to replace the losers who are continuing to allow the DoJ to hide the truth from the public. We ain't playing the stall game again.

2
ToxicLibertyism 2 points ago +2 / -0

May that orange powdery shit on Cheetos forever burn in hell, along with the people who have sold that chemical concoction as "food" to other humans.

3
ToxicLibertyism 3 points ago +3 / -0

...Where does our whole country go to get repaid for all of the wealth, all of the prosperity and security that has been stolen from us by decades of uncontrolled, illegal mass migration, because we all deserve reparations for what has been stolen from us...

Who has been loaning money to fund that out of control, and factually negligent govt.? The Federal Reserve Bank. They have funded all of the governments criminal activities and, never refused to stop; they are therefore liable. That's where we go to get reparations.

6
ToxicLibertyism 6 points ago +6 / -0

A). State action. State level laws that forbid illegal aliens from ownership, leasing, renting, using, or receiving public resources (including public utilities) owning bank accounts, etc.

B). Federal, and state laws that target employer's who hire illegal aliens. Ruinous asset seizure of businesses caught with illegal employees, etc. Fines, and prison time for illegal employer's. Possible enforcement of anti-slavery laws against offending businesses.

C). State and federal snitch program. Pay, and reward illegal aliens, and others, who provide credible information leading to the deportation of illegal aliens. Official bounty hunter operations.

D). Enforcement of the Communist Control Act, and Espionage Act, against all parties aiding, and abetting unknown illegal aliens from communist nations.

We can start there when people want to get serious about fixing the illegal alien problem.

1
ToxicLibertyism 1 point ago +1 / -0

The democrats are the party of Fear, Hate and Death...

...And, hypocrisy. Can't forget that one.

4
ToxicLibertyism 4 points ago +4 / -0

Holy blathering bullshit Batman! The BS begins at the very title, and continues throughout the entire opinion piece.

TL;DR: No, Ayn Rand makes no such "case against tariffs." The article is simply the author giving his opinion about how the book Atlas Shrugged (written by the now deceased Ayn Rand) could be twisted into some sort of convoluted endorsement for the "free-trade" agenda.

2
ToxicLibertyism 2 points ago +2 / -0

MIC needed a new boogie-man to justify its continuing monetary fleecing of the US taxpayer after the USSR fell. They got what they wanted.

view more: Next ›