It seems like the whole statement is cracking on the prosecutor, denying his motion to modify conditions of release. So I don't actually understand, having read the entire post, why she says at the end that the Court determines to deny "Defendant Trump's" motion.
The defense is showing options the Judge had to address this. But the Judge is allowing Jack to continue to incriminate himself to the world. The more evidence you have the more you can support your ruling in the end.
Smith started the game by his motion, and Trump returned service, so two motions are in play. It wouldn't make sense to deny Smith's motion but entertain Trump's motion, so this is just cleaning off the kitchen counter. (I think.)
Both are denied without prejudice. Meaning both can be refiled. It means she didn't rule on the merits of the argument.
Trump's motion is asking for sanctions with regard to this motion, the motion she just told Jack Smith he must refile if he wants it considered.
Presumably Trump can file his request for sanctions again if the refiled motion warrants it. Presumably Smith will do the conferral she is asking for and the sanctions won't be necessary.
It's not unusual for a judge to rule for a party and AGAINST the same party in the same motion.
Amazing. The first comment in X someone posted "Judge Cannon is corrupt AF." To the left, anyone who follows the law rather than executing their fever-dream pursuit of Trump is corrupt. Part of the 4-6%.
TDS in progress. But get ready for the arrest as it exposes the courts corruption to the world. They will convict a innocent man they are so corrupt. This will unite the people even more.
I am just aware of only two meanings. One is Team leader the other is To long and did not read. If it is anything else maybe someone here can advise us both.
It would appear that way if one ignores giving the defense time to respond to what was unsealed. Then base a ruling and allow the defense time to prepare for a proper trial.. This is a Court of law and not a railroad station.
It would appear that way if one ignores giving the defense time to respond to what was unsealed.
This goes back to January and it was Trump's team that wanted to file things unsealed (unredacted, actually,) so they have always known exactly what the filings said, because they wrote them. Redactions keep the info from the Public, not Trump's lawyers.
Judge Cannon issued a ruling and then reversed the ruling back on April 9th. It's May 28th. They still aren't public. It's been 5 months.
I like Judge Cannon... Cheers fren... ☕️☕️☕️
Amen, follows the letter of the law and not the DC DS BS. Thank you prayers on the way. Cheers to you also.
It seems like the whole statement is cracking on the prosecutor, denying his motion to modify conditions of release. So I don't actually understand, having read the entire post, why she says at the end that the Court determines to deny "Defendant Trump's" motion.
The defense is showing options the Judge had to address this. But the Judge is allowing Jack to continue to incriminate himself to the world. The more evidence you have the more you can support your ruling in the end.
Smith started the game by his motion, and Trump returned service, so two motions are in play. It wouldn't make sense to deny Smith's motion but entertain Trump's motion, so this is just cleaning off the kitchen counter. (I think.)
Both are denied without prejudice. Meaning both can be refiled. It means she didn't rule on the merits of the argument.
Trump's motion is asking for sanctions with regard to this motion, the motion she just told Jack Smith he must refile if he wants it considered.
Presumably Trump can file his request for sanctions again if the refiled motion warrants it. Presumably Smith will do the conferral she is asking for and the sanctions won't be necessary.
It's not unusual for a judge to rule for a party and AGAINST the same party in the same motion.
Thank you fren...
So incredibly rare to see an honest Judge, very refreshing.
Amen, a breath of fresh air and thank you prayers sent.
Indeed. One might say she is... part of the plan.
I bet she has military protection 24/7
Amazing. The first comment in X someone posted "Judge Cannon is corrupt AF." To the left, anyone who follows the law rather than executing their fever-dream pursuit of Trump is corrupt. Part of the 4-6%.
There is your sign that brain washing works. For some a light rinse will do the trick.
Yep, these are the same people who still believe Russia Russia Russia because their fake news programmers haven't told them it's all bs yet.
Exactly, all the promises they made to them have not been delivered as they were lies. But they ignore that fact. TDS in progress.
It is probably a bot.
All the comments are insane.
Corrupt because she won't silence Trump? What is corrupt about that, actually? We do have a first amendment, and that is violating it.
what a concept a judge that is actually following the law.....ill be dipped in shit and rolled in breadcrumbs
Amen, a breath of fresh air with thank you prayers on the way.
And baked to a crackly crunch!
All the comments are insane.
TDS in progress. But get ready for the arrest as it exposes the courts corruption to the world. They will convict a innocent man they are so corrupt. This will unite the people even more.
It will excite the leftie loonies.
Just hand them a manual can opener and tell them to use it. That will keep them busy trying to figure it out..
Kek Fren.
lol
For a little bit. But then Trump polls go up 10%. Then they'll look for the next dopamine anti trump hit.
Amen.
95% at least. Mind blowing.
I'm starting to like this broad. Get 'em Judge!
Following the letter of the law and not the DC DS BS.
Hey now, that's woman to you, fren.
She ain't no Ketanji!
Ketanji? Is that similar to Punjabi?
I'd say it's closer to Kamala.
Heels up? That thing?
Judge Cannon for Supreme Court.
I agree.
This Judge is on fire.
She follows the letter of the law, unlike what we are seeing in NYC.
For newbie bewbies, what's the TLDR?
I am just aware of only two meanings. One is Team leader the other is To long and did not read. If it is anything else maybe someone here can advise us both.
It was denied without prejudice.
This means they can resubmit it. It seems like she is going to ask them to confer and resubmit.
There still could be sanctions for this.
Not going to happen.
Finally found you! So what lottery numbers do I need to pick?
Kek.
lol
Great move as it forces Jack Chit to expose himself even more. He dug this hole nice and deep and forgot he can no longer come out of it.
This.
Can you elaborate?
Do you agree with the theory that Judge Cannon is deliberately trying to delay this case?
Jack and his team brought on these delays as the court so well has pointed out.
Well a lot of these motions were filed months ago.
This one that just got released, was filed in February.
https://static.foxnews.com/foxnews.com/content/uploads/2024/05/Doc_566_Motion.pdf
it hasn't been decided it's only just been put on the docket.
Trump asked for permission for additional discovery in Jan. She hasn't ruled on it.
Back in March she asked for filings about jury instructions. When the trial date wasn't even set. and when she already rejected one of the arguments.
https://static01.nyt.com/newsgraphics/documenttools/f0ee3456be6a5fcf/06814efe-full.pdf
I think these are deliberate and she is gumming up the works where she can
It would appear that way if one ignores giving the defense time to respond to what was unsealed. Then base a ruling and allow the defense time to prepare for a proper trial.. This is a Court of law and not a railroad station.
This goes back to January and it was Trump's team that wanted to file things unsealed (unredacted, actually,) so they have always known exactly what the filings said, because they wrote them. Redactions keep the info from the Public, not Trump's lawyers.
Judge Cannon issued a ruling and then reversed the ruling back on April 9th. It's May 28th. They still aren't public. It's been 5 months.