So Q and Trump gathered all the worst player around Trump. Posted facts to get us to look at this person, that person, this data, ... So that when we all find out the truth; the connections just go BOOM BOOM BOOM.
TC has been on a hell of a good rip lately but the laptop fiasco he helped with still bothers me. Meh.
Everyone is dirty. Everyone. Do we forgive them? Do we know why he did what he did? Did he, in hindsight, make a mistake that he now regrets? He was still working for faux at the time and probably conflicted... and probably threatened as well. We will never know.
I've come to the inevitable conclusion that just about everyone is dirty in one way or another after making the connections between mother Teresa and mossad Maxwell (child trafficking), the Dali lama (perversion and child trafficking), etc, etc, etc
If they're famous in ANY capacity, they're compromised. Period. That's the price of admission into "the club"... For my own sanity, I'm going to conveniently have cognitive dissonance around the possibility that our CIC could also be dirty in some way... I don't think so, and again... without knowing circumstances, I can forgive a select few... yanno... depending... Unfortunately, that's reality.
If I remember correctly Shillary actually said “can’t we just drone strike this guy?” when talking about Assange/Wikileaks. The room laughed until they realized she wasn’t kidding.
If Tucker is not being "allowed to play a role" then he would be getting the JA treatment too. Or worse. So while I find it all interesting, we all have to read between all the lines also.
I am still very much on the fence about Tucker, but I lean towards him being a limited hangout with a role to play. So what if a CIA director calls him out for calling out the CIA op; its already established there are warring factions INSIDE agencies who would just as well throw each other under the bus; in addition to agencies warring among each other. What better way for Tucker as a carefully controlled mouthpiece to gain more street cred with the dissident right than to be attacked by other Deep State entities?
I believe this is the same strategy that keeps Alex Jones credible to so many... if they appear to be getting crucified by known enemies, then they MUST be legit right? Not so fast. I'm not saying yes or no either way with Tucker, but with his CIA connections in the past, and his impeccable ability to have HORRIBLE timing for reporting on every major crisis in our time (months or years after the damage is done), just be wary, be skeptical with any high profile media personality no matter their ideology, no matter who seems to target them.
Having said all that I said, I give big points to Tucker for today's convo with Massie. Everyone needs to watch the segment on AIPAC. Cat's finally getting out of the bag on that one.
Julian Assange "When all is finally exposed, 98% of Washington will fall". They will all be expose for 'Crimes against children'. SOUND OF FREEDOM!!!
So Q and Trump gathered all the worst player around Trump. Posted facts to get us to look at this person, that person, this data, ... So that when we all find out the truth; the connections just go BOOM BOOM BOOM.
TC has been on a hell of a good rip lately but the laptop fiasco he helped with still bothers me. Meh.
Someone has been paying attention. 🍻
Everyone is dirty. Everyone. Do we forgive them? Do we know why he did what he did? Did he, in hindsight, make a mistake that he now regrets? He was still working for faux at the time and probably conflicted... and probably threatened as well. We will never know.
I've come to the inevitable conclusion that just about everyone is dirty in one way or another after making the connections between mother Teresa and mossad Maxwell (child trafficking), the Dali lama (perversion and child trafficking), etc, etc, etc
If they're famous in ANY capacity, they're compromised. Period. That's the price of admission into "the club"... For my own sanity, I'm going to conveniently have cognitive dissonance around the possibility that our CIC could also be dirty in some way... I don't think so, and again... without knowing circumstances, I can forgive a select few... yanno... depending... Unfortunately, that's reality.
If I remember correctly Shillary actually said “can’t we just drone strike this guy?” when talking about Assange/Wikileaks. The room laughed until they realized she wasn’t kidding.
If Tucker is not being "allowed to play a role" then he would be getting the JA treatment too. Or worse. So while I find it all interesting, we all have to read between all the lines also.
you are forgetting who is in control.
for some time now, it has been our side that allows things to happen.
Stick around... they will be coming after him very hard, very soon.
I am still very much on the fence about Tucker, but I lean towards him being a limited hangout with a role to play. So what if a CIA director calls him out for calling out the CIA op; its already established there are warring factions INSIDE agencies who would just as well throw each other under the bus; in addition to agencies warring among each other. What better way for Tucker as a carefully controlled mouthpiece to gain more street cred with the dissident right than to be attacked by other Deep State entities?
I believe this is the same strategy that keeps Alex Jones credible to so many... if they appear to be getting crucified by known enemies, then they MUST be legit right? Not so fast. I'm not saying yes or no either way with Tucker, but with his CIA connections in the past, and his impeccable ability to have HORRIBLE timing for reporting on every major crisis in our time (months or years after the damage is done), just be wary, be skeptical with any high profile media personality no matter their ideology, no matter who seems to target them.
I agree. Very few people do I trust a lot when it comes to their motives. This includes some who may be seen as villains now.
Having said all that I said, I give big points to Tucker for today's convo with Massie. Everyone needs to watch the segment on AIPAC. Cat's finally getting out of the bag on that one.
Trump knew. It needed release through someone else. Thank you, Tucker.
Pompeo is the one responsible for the "Monsanto Protection Act." I've never trusted Pompeo.