PSA: The 9th Circuit Didn't Rule the mRNA Vaccines are Therapeutics
(www.uncoverdc.com)
🔍 Precedent Set! 💉
Comments (15)
sorted by:
TL;DR - the 9th circuit did not rule that mRNA shots are not vaccines, but they did say that it needs to be argued.
Thanks for posting this.
I wouldn't even qualify them as therapeutics.
Eugenic therapeutics?
Therapeutic abortions!
Agreed, Fren.
Genocide shot.
If Iraq had developed them, then the US would have had cause to bomb iraq
Way back in 2021 or 2022, didn't the 5th circuit court rule that mandates were unconstitutional coercion because they did not prevent transmission (so they were therapeutics, not vaccines?) I haven't looked for the link. Been driving 11 hours today.
Edit. Here is the link. (Good old "search" in the text messages fount it.)
Fwd:BREAKING: Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals issues emergency halt to Biden’s unconstitutional vaccine mandate – Dr. Eddy Bettermann MD https://dreddymd.com/2021/11/07/breaking-fifth-circuit-court-of-appeals-issues-emergency-halt-to-bidens-unconstitutional-vaccine-mandate/
I remember reading the Biden mandate on .gov way at the bottom that it was not intended to force or be treated like a law, or cause discrimination and things like that.
I saved it, but that phone died... not sure if it's still up there...
well... they aren't therapeutics, either. at its best its a placebo; at its worst, a bioweapon.
and big props to anyone who can actually get a good placebo effect from a bioweapon... ...my faith is not that strong.
It’s diabolical that VA employees get incentivised paid time off with the more jabs they take
In my opinion the entire case, regarding vaccines being mandated in the “best interests of the public” as ruled by SCOTUS in 1905, needs to be revisited. Documentation now shows that most vaccines are neither safe, nor effective, and really do NOT prevent any of the diseases/illness to which Big Pharma claims. The vaccine industry is out of control. The more money Big Pharma makes, the more vaccines they create. Which in turn results in more bodily damage, sometimes not immediately, but down the road. We know more now after decades of study and research and therefore I purport that the SC decision of 1905 must be revisited.
I saw an older piece where Pfizer was earning $1000 a second at the height of all the nonsense. The same article went on to complain how obscene it was that Africa was so under-vaxxed given what they were making. I agree what they were making was obscene, but strongly disagree with the follow up
Their phony concern for unvaccinated africans is vomit inducing
The ruling is a step in the right direction, but I’ve seen lots of inaccurate statements about this ruling.