Is Geert Wilders now dressing as a woman and going by the name Marjolein Faber? I’m confused about why her comments are being assigned to him?
And, if you listen closely she’s saying her Political Party will remain opposed to demographic changing immigration policies, she just won’t use the term Great Replacement.
Thanks for explaining why her statements were being attributed to him. I think we are so accustomed to being betrayed, we sometimes sense betrayal when that isn’t what is happening.
I watched the clip multiple times and came away with a different conclusion. The Dutch DS is trying to demonize the PVV for talking about the Great Replacement Theory. Her statement basically says we won’t give you a club to beat us with, we won’t let you label us as Nazis.
Then, she says I won’t use the term Great Replacement, I am replacing it with the term Demographic Change. She is saying their goals regarding immigration are the same, the terms they will use to describe it are changing.
Given that they even got elected, then have had to negotiate for the last 6 months just to form a coalition government (with other parties), I find it very hard to see this little speech by the PVV member (retweeted by Wilders) as any sort of lie or betrayal of the values they ran on.
I think it would be wise to keep eyes on. In any case, I'll refrain from drawing any big conclusions based only on this tweet.
At first glance, I think WSS might be over-reacting a tad.
A) all the usual rags label him as far-right
B) after the elections, his party has been compelled to form a coalition in order to become a key part of the government.
Coalition governments are inherently the creatures of compromise. Instead of a knee-jerk response that "he lied", maybe it's more effective to consider the pragmatic situation he and his party found themselves in? Is their election, and furthermore, being able to actually NOW play a role in setting national policy a PLUS for the Awakening or a MINUS?
Dutch politician Geert Wilders abandoned his plans for 'Nexit' and a ban on the Koran in order to strike a coalition deal and finally form a government, reports say.
In an agreement published on Thursday, the coalition of four parties said they will implement the country's 'strictest-ever' asylum policy by opting out of European Rules - setting up a clash with Brussels before even taking office.
According to Dutch reports, Wilders - a far-right populist and long-time euro-sceptic - was prepared to sacrifice 'just about everything' for a tougher immigration regime.
THE HAGUE (AP) — Anti-Islam firebrand Geert Wilders and three other party leaders agreed on a coalition deal early Thursday that veers the Netherlands toward the hard right, capping a half year of tumultuous negotiations that still left it unclear who would become prime minister.
The “Hope, courage and pride” agreement introduces strict measures on asylum seekers, scraps family reunification for refugees and seeks to reduce the number of international students studying in the country.
“Deport people without a valid residence permit as much as possible, even forcibly,” the 26-page document says.
“We are writing history today,” Wilders proclaimed, saying he had made sure the three other coalition parties, including the one of outgoing Prime Minister Mark Rutte, had accepted the core of his program.
“The sun will shine again in the Netherlands,” Wilders said. “It is the strongest asylum policy ever.”
With hard-right and populist parties now part of or leading a half dozen governments in the 27-nation European Union, they appear positioned to make gains in the bloc’s June 6-9 election. Wilders has been a political ally of radical right and populist leaders such as Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán, Italian Prime Minister Georgia Meloni and French opposition leader Marine Le Pen.
“My party will be at the center of power. It makes us enormously proud,” Wilders said.
He had to make personal compromises, though. Wilders has already reluctantly acknowledged that he will not succeed Rutte at the country’s helm. The parties still have to agree on a prime minister, who is expected to be a technocrat from outside the party structures.
Speculation has centered on Ronald Plasterk from the Labor Party, who shot back to prominence this year when he became the first “scout” to hold talks with political leaders about possible coalitions.
The deal said the next government will continue with existing plans to combat climate change, including continuing to pay for a climate change fund established last year. But the Farmers Citizens Movement is part of the coalition, and the deal includes soothing language and concessions to farmers who have blocked cities with tractors during disruptive protests.
Other points in the agreement include increasing social housing, stricter sentences for serious crimes and capping property taxes.
The group intends to continue supporting Ukraine and wants to enshrine the NATO standard of spending 2% of gross domestic product on defense into law.
EU headquarters may not welcome a line in the coalition deal that says “the Netherlands is very critical against further enlargement of the European Union,” at a time when many other member nations want to add Ukraine and some other eastern nations. The EU needs unanimity among its current nations before it can add more.
The parties will explain the program to parliament on Thursday, though a debate will not be held on the agreement until next week.
TY for being the voice of reason once again. Anons are as easily manipulated by the influencers as any normie. We like to talk a good game -- discernment, logic, 72 hour rule, blah, blah, blah -- but our confirmation biases and our fears are always apparent and easily manipulated and we rarely follow those ideals we claim separates us from the sheep.
He was never supposed to win. He was supposed to always serve as a bogeyman for the globalist left. The left needs their bogeymen. They are nothing without them.
His whole party and all those he pushes forward for taking ministerial responsibility, are kissing the ring to the point of denying the great replacement theory.
Mossad boy through and through.
added: he promised to go to the EU to request to deviate from their plans ..... that does not sound very ... sovereign, is it? All the while the whole EU thingy is being rolled out based on unlawfulness.
Dutch rejected in a lawful referendum: the EU treaty.
the political reality is, the plush stickers simply ignore it.
This actually is abit different, the left are going after her because she said it was an "omvolking" "replacement theory" going on in the Netherlands. The left didn't like that and yelled nazi ect ect. So she was forced to call it different.
Is Geert Wilders now dressing as a woman and going by the name Marjolein Faber? I’m confused about why her comments are being assigned to him?
And, if you listen closely she’s saying her Political Party will remain opposed to demographic changing immigration policies, she just won’t use the term Great Replacement.
Wilders retweeted this clip and commented that she's making sense, just like their whole party.
Essentially saying there is no conspiracy, but that demographic change is an issue and needs to be tackled.
Not exactly Globalist talk, but...
Thanks for explaining why her statements were being attributed to him. I think we are so accustomed to being betrayed, we sometimes sense betrayal when that isn’t what is happening.
I watched the clip multiple times and came away with a different conclusion. The Dutch DS is trying to demonize the PVV for talking about the Great Replacement Theory. Her statement basically says we won’t give you a club to beat us with, we won’t let you label us as Nazis.
Then, she says I won’t use the term Great Replacement, I am replacing it with the term Demographic Change. She is saying their goals regarding immigration are the same, the terms they will use to describe it are changing.
Given that they even got elected, then have had to negotiate for the last 6 months just to form a coalition government (with other parties), I find it very hard to see this little speech by the PVV member (retweeted by Wilders) as any sort of lie or betrayal of the values they ran on.
I was wondering about that also. So many strange things I would assume he is a she now.
How many are actually digging here, and how many just go, yeah, bias confirmed?
Anyway, here is the reason WSS made his claim:
https://x.com/geertwilderspvv/status/1805259809383497877
I think it would be wise to keep eyes on. In any case, I'll refrain from drawing any big conclusions based only on this tweet.
At first glance, I think WSS might be over-reacting a tad.
A) all the usual rags label him as far-right
B) after the elections, his party has been compelled to form a coalition in order to become a key part of the government.
Coalition governments are inherently the creatures of compromise. Instead of a knee-jerk response that "he lied", maybe it's more effective to consider the pragmatic situation he and his party found themselves in? Is their election, and furthermore, being able to actually NOW play a role in setting national policy a PLUS for the Awakening or a MINUS?
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13429521/Dutch-politician-Geert-Wilders-abandons-plans-Nexit-Koran-ban-seal-strictest-asylum-policy-Netherlands-opt-EU-rules.html
Dutch politician Geert Wilders abandoned his plans for 'Nexit' and a ban on the Koran in order to strike a coalition deal and finally form a government, reports say.
In an agreement published on Thursday, the coalition of four parties said they will implement the country's 'strictest-ever' asylum policy by opting out of European Rules - setting up a clash with Brussels before even taking office.
According to Dutch reports, Wilders - a far-right populist and long-time euro-sceptic - was prepared to sacrifice 'just about everything' for a tougher immigration regime.
https://apnews.com/article/netherlands-government-radical-right-immigration-wilders-77ff99e0798d54d150d320706a685a38
THE HAGUE (AP) — Anti-Islam firebrand Geert Wilders and three other party leaders agreed on a coalition deal early Thursday that veers the Netherlands toward the hard right, capping a half year of tumultuous negotiations that still left it unclear who would become prime minister.
The “Hope, courage and pride” agreement introduces strict measures on asylum seekers, scraps family reunification for refugees and seeks to reduce the number of international students studying in the country.
“Deport people without a valid residence permit as much as possible, even forcibly,” the 26-page document says.
“We are writing history today,” Wilders proclaimed, saying he had made sure the three other coalition parties, including the one of outgoing Prime Minister Mark Rutte, had accepted the core of his program.
“The sun will shine again in the Netherlands,” Wilders said. “It is the strongest asylum policy ever.”
With hard-right and populist parties now part of or leading a half dozen governments in the 27-nation European Union, they appear positioned to make gains in the bloc’s June 6-9 election. Wilders has been a political ally of radical right and populist leaders such as Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán, Italian Prime Minister Georgia Meloni and French opposition leader Marine Le Pen.
“My party will be at the center of power. It makes us enormously proud,” Wilders said.
He had to make personal compromises, though. Wilders has already reluctantly acknowledged that he will not succeed Rutte at the country’s helm. The parties still have to agree on a prime minister, who is expected to be a technocrat from outside the party structures.
Speculation has centered on Ronald Plasterk from the Labor Party, who shot back to prominence this year when he became the first “scout” to hold talks with political leaders about possible coalitions.
The deal said the next government will continue with existing plans to combat climate change, including continuing to pay for a climate change fund established last year. But the Farmers Citizens Movement is part of the coalition, and the deal includes soothing language and concessions to farmers who have blocked cities with tractors during disruptive protests.
Other points in the agreement include increasing social housing, stricter sentences for serious crimes and capping property taxes.
The group intends to continue supporting Ukraine and wants to enshrine the NATO standard of spending 2% of gross domestic product on defense into law.
EU headquarters may not welcome a line in the coalition deal that says “the Netherlands is very critical against further enlargement of the European Union,” at a time when many other member nations want to add Ukraine and some other eastern nations. The EU needs unanimity among its current nations before it can add more.
The parties will explain the program to parliament on Thursday, though a debate will not be held on the agreement until next week.
TY for being the voice of reason once again. Anons are as easily manipulated by the influencers as any normie. We like to talk a good game -- discernment, logic, 72 hour rule, blah, blah, blah -- but our confirmation biases and our fears are always apparent and easily manipulated and we rarely follow those ideals we claim separates us from the sheep.
Again TY for the reasoned response.
Dude volunteered on an Israel kibbutz and is married to a jewish woman. What the fuck did they expect?
OH. Root of the problems.
Spoiler alert - they all lie
Yeah.
Well yeah, he's Jewish. Duh.
God's protected and chosen. Right??
He was never supposed to win. He was supposed to always serve as a bogeyman for the globalist left. The left needs their bogeymen. They are nothing without them.
I understand.
I have a suggestion, if you live in Netherland, carry an egg wherever you go, and you see him, toss an egg. Enough people do that, and he will learn.
No you need to do more than that. Make his life, what remains of it, a living hell, just like all the globalist do to us.
Can we throw eggs? LOL
https://www.nationalreview.com/news/incoming-argentinian-president-javier-milei-plans-to-convert-to-judaism/
Joining the cabal?
he's a zionist.
also, same thing with Meloni. it seems that the cabal owns both sides.
Yeah. Just like Egypt vs Babylon.
Of course he did.
His whole party and all those he pushes forward for taking ministerial responsibility, are kissing the ring to the point of denying the great replacement theory.
Mossad boy through and through.
added: he promised to go to the EU to request to deviate from their plans ..... that does not sound very ... sovereign, is it? All the while the whole EU thingy is being rolled out based on unlawfulness.
appeasing evil won't work
Deportation of violent Muslim extremists? But how else are they supposed to keep up the hopes of a global Caliphate? 🥹
🕋 🐖 🐕
exactly.
This actually is abit different, the left are going after her because she said it was an "omvolking" "replacement theory" going on in the Netherlands. The left didn't like that and yelled nazi ect ect. So she was forced to call it different.
Yet we all know that "omvolking" is going on.
Changing name won't change the truth.
Hegelian Dialectic. Islamists vs Zionists.
Chump never bow down to evil.
Yes.
Exposed as a fraud if he doesn't come through.
Amen