Text is a poor medium for conveying sarcasm. Missing intonation, facial expression of the speaker, etc. I run into that at work a lot. Humor is lost in texts and emails.
Everyone is not on the spectrum. You either have full-blown autism or you are not autistic. The 'spectrum' refers to the wide variation in the type and severity of dis-regulation of the nervous system that autists experience. If you have autism, then your thalamus, hypothalamus, amygdala, cingulate, and hippocampus are FUBAR. Your entire limbic system is fucked. Neurotypical people aren't on the spectrum because there is nothing wrong with their limbic system.
There are five diagnostic criteria, and all five have to be met to have autism:
Have social deficits across multiple contexts.
Have repetitive behavior and at least one other issue in category B
Be born with Autism
Be impaired relative to your peers.
the autism has to be attributed to actual physiological differences of the brain and not retardation or faggotry (comorbidity is allowed--you can be a retarded faggot with autism).
My bad , I tend to conflate autistic & autism. But things change in this area of practice frequently. JFK's sister had a lobotomy and more recently Gender dysphoria and homosexuality were both Mental disorders. But I do like your refined THEORY. Matter of fact some still recommend the Jab. You?
It is possible (for higher functioning autists) to retrain their brain to compensate for some of the missing bits if they work at it, at least to ameliorate some of the effects.
Think of it like a blind person's brain devoting more brain power to the hearing function etc.
You can add intonation through choice of words, which is important for any written work.
The problem with work emails is when you and your peers want to / are expected to remain professional, so you use a more professional tone conveyance through text with less nonsense.
For me, I read the subtext ("He uncovered and released information that the political establishment and government wanted to stay hidden", which has a linguistic slant against the political establishment) and came to the conclusion that it was sarcasm, then I looked at the name.
There are additional clues within the greater post of subtext, as the entire point is that Assange isn't a journalist because today's journalists don't uncover things the government wants to keep hidden.
Text is a poor medium for conveying sarcasm. Missing intonation, facial expression of the speaker, etc. I run into that at work a lot. Humor is lost in texts and emails.
Everyone is on the Autism Spectrum
Me.
Us
Everyone is not on the spectrum. You either have full-blown autism or you are not autistic. The 'spectrum' refers to the wide variation in the type and severity of dis-regulation of the nervous system that autists experience. If you have autism, then your thalamus, hypothalamus, amygdala, cingulate, and hippocampus are FUBAR. Your entire limbic system is fucked. Neurotypical people aren't on the spectrum because there is nothing wrong with their limbic system.
There are five diagnostic criteria, and all five have to be met to have autism:
Have social deficits across multiple contexts.
Have repetitive behavior and at least one other issue in category B
Be born with Autism
Be impaired relative to your peers.
the autism has to be attributed to actual physiological differences of the brain and not retardation or faggotry (comorbidity is allowed--you can be a retarded faggot with autism).
👏👏👏👏 on the knowledge found in this post.
False
You are faggot
My bad , I tend to conflate autistic & autism. But things change in this area of practice frequently. JFK's sister had a lobotomy and more recently Gender dysphoria and homosexuality were both Mental disorders. But I do like your refined THEORY. Matter of fact some still recommend the Jab. You?
It is possible (for higher functioning autists) to retrain their brain to compensate for some of the missing bits if they work at it, at least to ameliorate some of the effects.
Think of it like a blind person's brain devoting more brain power to the hearing function etc.
Still, it's rare so probably not that relevant.
He’s speaking to his audience. They get it.
You can add intonation through choice of words, which is important for any written work.
The problem with work emails is when you and your peers want to / are expected to remain professional, so you use a more professional tone conveyance through text with less nonsense.
For me, I read the subtext ("He uncovered and released information that the political establishment and government wanted to stay hidden", which has a linguistic slant against the political establishment) and came to the conclusion that it was sarcasm, then I looked at the name.
There are additional clues within the greater post of subtext, as the entire point is that Assange isn't a journalist because today's journalists don't uncover things the government wants to keep hidden.
Yeah if you have previous experience with Michael Malice you're used to this sort of sarcasm from him.
I suppose I wouldn't blame people for not always catching context or subtext in a post.
Sometimes we just want to tune out and take some things at face value because things are rarely as it appears anymore.
I got it because of two juxtaposed concepts.
He actually described what a journalist is suppose to be and
Asked the question in such a way as to come across as sarcastic.
Didn't really need the /s
Defense mechanism to bypass HR🤣👍🏻