...or perhaps a document they had seen before, maybe even recently? Like a high level summary of terms they thought they had locked in through their lawyer?
Pictures of declined deals? I’m trying to imagine a picture of a declined deal that won’t still look like a sentence or paragraph to read. Their reactions to the envelopes were instantaneous. Picture of HW being water boarded or blindfolded with a gun to his head? Those sound dumb but I dunno. What can a picture of a declined deal look like?
...when associated with Q posts by timestamp (2504) and date (293) suggest a possible clue as to what was communicated through the Timberwolf funeral envelopes.
So the Secret Service publicly says farewell to a President they protected. This is remarkable? What "possible clue"? Since a clue is only suggestive by definition, this is a "possible suggestion"? Such things are indistinguishable from flights of fancy. Sometimes, "clues" are false leads.
Suggestions and symbolism are a looser form of communication. Indirect. It's what the cabal has used for a long time.
Compare it to UDP vs TCP packets. Written and spoken language are TCP--validated and pretty much guaranteed to arrive. Symbolism is sent and you won't know for sure if the recipient got it.
Sometimes the communications are interpreted incorrectly or mistakenly, as you describe, but logically it does not wash that 100% of the symbolism is meaningless.
Symbolism is like a picture: it takes a thousand words to explain it.
Information theory defines communication as an information transfer process that reduces uncertainty about a proposition. No uncertainty is reduced by inarticulate symbols, and an event pulled out of context isn't even a symbol. You are on target only if you exactly know the meaning. Without the "exactness," then, yes, the symbol is meaningless.
You have a fantasy about what "the cabal has used." I've seen this so often. Someone floats a speculation, it gains currency, and then people simply take it as proven fact because everyone is parroting it. I guess that's pretty good---if you are a parrot.
If you understand communication by that definition, why do you struggle with the idea that Q team have created a form of symbolic communication that this forum is dedicated to utilizing?
Do you think it takes anons 1000 words to understand when POTUS flashes an air Q or quotes statistics with 17 or 33 in them?
Also I'm a bit surprised you think written and oral communication are exact. We have a whole branch of government dedicated to resolving disputes over the meaning of our written laws. 🤣🤣🤣
I don't bother to struggle with symbols. I'm happy when Q says things straight out, or provides a key to the symbols. But they don't speak for themselves.
The only thing Trump's references mean is "I am acquainted with Q." Duh.
I never said anything about exactness, which is your invention. I was pointing out the purpose of communication, which is to reduce uncertainty concerning propositions. This comes from Claude Shannon, who extended the principles of thermodynamics to information theory. But it is, and always has been, true that exactness in speech and writing is the acme of good communication. Nothing you say changes that fact.
Wild conspiracy theory here: Assuming the Project Looking Glass conspiracy is true and assuming the democrats/deepstate had previously had control of the technology to impose their will, what if it was a picture of Trump in possession of said technology.?
+1 puppets seem to include the politicians who are the visible actors for all of the elitists and their fraternities; possibly George Bush the younger caught the drift of the message from the envelopes
Scotty Mar10 called these "golden tickets".
Link in #155 which has an 0600 reference and a "who countered", which ties into the "promise to counter".
u/#q155
u/#q2608
What a post merf! This is GOLD! 💛🌟
References:
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/george-h-w-bush-secret-service-detail-bids-farewell-timberwolf-n945266
u/#q293
u/#q2504
Basic timestamp & date connections. I haven't seen it mentioned before but it probably has been.
They reacted so quickly, it had to be super short messages.
Maybe just "deal declined"?
...or perhaps a document they had seen before, maybe even recently? Like a high level summary of terms they thought they had locked in through their lawyer?
Pictures of declined deals? I’m trying to imagine a picture of a declined deal that won’t still look like a sentence or paragraph to read. Their reactions to the envelopes were instantaneous. Picture of HW being water boarded or blindfolded with a gun to his head? Those sound dumb but I dunno. What can a picture of a declined deal look like?
If the requested deal was something to avoid jail, it could be a picture of a cell. That is just one example of what could be very many.
Image of a hangman's noose might do it.
Look, someone needs to explain the meaning of this post, or it remains mysterious garbage. This is not information.
The secret service email referenced in this link:
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/george-h-w-bush-secret-service-detail-bids-farewell-timberwolf-n945266
...when associated with Q posts by timestamp (2504) and date (293) suggest a possible clue as to what was communicated through the Timberwolf funeral envelopes.
So the Secret Service publicly says farewell to a President they protected. This is remarkable? What "possible clue"? Since a clue is only suggestive by definition, this is a "possible suggestion"? Such things are indistinguishable from flights of fancy. Sometimes, "clues" are false leads.
Suggestions and symbolism are a looser form of communication. Indirect. It's what the cabal has used for a long time.
Compare it to UDP vs TCP packets. Written and spoken language are TCP--validated and pretty much guaranteed to arrive. Symbolism is sent and you won't know for sure if the recipient got it.
Sometimes the communications are interpreted incorrectly or mistakenly, as you describe, but logically it does not wash that 100% of the symbolism is meaningless.
Symbolism is like a picture: it takes a thousand words to explain it.
Information theory defines communication as an information transfer process that reduces uncertainty about a proposition. No uncertainty is reduced by inarticulate symbols, and an event pulled out of context isn't even a symbol. You are on target only if you exactly know the meaning. Without the "exactness," then, yes, the symbol is meaningless.
You have a fantasy about what "the cabal has used." I've seen this so often. Someone floats a speculation, it gains currency, and then people simply take it as proven fact because everyone is parroting it. I guess that's pretty good---if you are a parrot.
If you understand communication by that definition, why do you struggle with the idea that Q team have created a form of symbolic communication that this forum is dedicated to utilizing?
Do you think it takes anons 1000 words to understand when POTUS flashes an air Q or quotes statistics with 17 or 33 in them?
Also I'm a bit surprised you think written and oral communication are exact. We have a whole branch of government dedicated to resolving disputes over the meaning of our written laws. 🤣🤣🤣
I don't bother to struggle with symbols. I'm happy when Q says things straight out, or provides a key to the symbols. But they don't speak for themselves.
The only thing Trump's references mean is "I am acquainted with Q." Duh.
I never said anything about exactness, which is your invention. I was pointing out the purpose of communication, which is to reduce uncertainty concerning propositions. This comes from Claude Shannon, who extended the principles of thermodynamics to information theory. But it is, and always has been, true that exactness in speech and writing is the acme of good communication. Nothing you say changes that fact.
Bro, please increase the contextual memory of your chatbot to greater than one paragraph. 🤣🤣🤣
Wild conspiracy theory here: Assuming the Project Looking Glass conspiracy is true and assuming the democrats/deepstate had previously had control of the technology to impose their will, what if it was a picture of Trump in possession of said technology.?
As fast as the response was from Jeb I thought a photo likely.
+1 puppets seem to include the politicians who are the visible actors for all of the elitists and their fraternities; possibly George Bush the younger caught the drift of the message from the envelopes