Her dystopian "opinion" is in direct opposition to what the Second Amendment is about... namely an armed citizenry both for militia purposes AND for self defense.
Self defense is a natural, God-given right. What part of "shall not be infringed" does she not understand?
She can hire someone with a gun to keep her safe, but we shouldn't be allowed to keep ourselves safe for free? The nerve of these people is unbelievable.
Then she should publicly fire him and set the precedent for other security personnel to just let things happen. Let’s see how that goes when the word gets out. See if she “sticks to her guns” then.
This- excellent example of what we need to do to use their agenda against them. There should be public backlash telling her to live by her example and have security that is not armed. If she pushes back, what makes her more important than others. We need to highlight the hypocrisy and push forward.
She is correct for once. The 2nd Amendment is a Restriction on The Gov. of The People's Right not to be infringed. None of the rights in the Bill of Rights were 'given' by Gov, so they are committing treason for attempting to infringe them.
She should have shared her dissent with her bodyguard! NO SHOOTING!
DIRECTIONAL ERROR
Her dystopian "opinion" is in direct opposition to what the Second Amendment is about... namely an armed citizenry both for militia purposes AND for self defense.
Self defense is a natural, God-given right. What part of "shall not be infringed" does she not understand?
EDIT: Who appointed this looser anyway?
Obama
Well THAT explains a lot.
figures....
Barry, big mike’s wife.
She can hire someone with a gun to keep her safe, but we shouldn't be allowed to keep ourselves safe for free? The nerve of these people is unbelievable.
She didn't hire him - she gets a security duty. She pays nothing.
So we hired him.
Then she should publicly fire him and set the precedent for other security personnel to just let things happen. Let’s see how that goes when the word gets out. See if she “sticks to her guns” then.
That’s a great point. We the people should not allow her to have a gun at all forever to see how she feels when she is telling us not to have guns..
This- excellent example of what we need to do to use their agenda against them. There should be public backlash telling her to live by her example and have security that is not armed. If she pushes back, what makes her more important than others. We need to highlight the hypocrisy and push forward.
We have to start working on it.
The hypocrisy of the left in a perfectly framed example. Rules for thee, but not for me.
Exactly.
She's a clown.
She is correct for once. The 2nd Amendment is a Restriction on The Gov. of The People's Right not to be infringed. None of the rights in the Bill of Rights were 'given' by Gov, so they are committing treason for attempting to infringe them.
"Instant karma's gonna get you...."
Rules for thee, not for me...
https://x.com/davidharsanyi/status/1810730958896910697
any public servent pushing for gun control should have their armed security stripped from them. Let them buy their own
What did they write it for then bitch? To defend against a tyrannical government?
She's a pig in a robe.
Glock 48?
No. Looks like an old S&W sigma
She's a fugly wildebeest hypocrite hag