Trump should have been ushered off that stage long before the first shots. The USSS wanted him dead. I would like to know if the police reported the threat to the USSS when they were told of someone on the roof and WHO it was reported to. Will we ever know the truth?
Do they even follow the Incident Command System? They should.
A previous agency (for which I liasoned) followed ICS protocol while providing operational security for the Olympics when held in a US state.
Was the incident commander next to, or in immediate communication with, the cia commander or liason? Even if you're operating on different channels, it's ridiculous that this took many minutes to resolve, and that the shooter even had a chance to fire at shots AT ALL.
At best, this is manifest incompetence on the part of police and/or commanders, liasons, or both. Yes, things can get chaotic and confusing, but these guys (should) be used to this. It's part of THEIR JOB. I guarantee any 911 dispatcher worth their salt is absolutely aghast at the magnitude of the fustercluck of security response.
Worst case, Trump was targeted. In which case heads need to roll.
I'm still not 100% certain the first three shots (slow, deliberate cadence) are from the same gun as the next five (rapid cadence).
I listened to the shot sequence in this video about 20-30 times in rapid succession. Doing this with any audio clip usually reveals small sound variations that were missed in the first dozen hearings, as the brain tires of hearing the same exact set of sound waves and begins to detect tiny, previously unnoticed details among them. (Great for learning musical phrases too :)
Not only do the two salvos have MARKEDLY different pacing between shots, which is extremely noticeable on first hearing; but the ECHO of the five-salvo, which is plainly audible only after the fifth shot, sounds slightly different (lower pitch, and without the very high-pitched flourish at the end of the echo) from that of each of the first three slow shots.
Then obviously the next shot right after the five (SNAP with almost no echo) is from a different rifle, as is the one, somewhat fainter, ten seconds later. Those could be from the same gun as each other, or two different guns.
Yeah the first 3 sounds different. It's not as noticeable as some of the other videos out there. The shooter in the window hypothesis is getting stronger. Since he was directly in between Trump and the shooters the first shots aren't muffled like audio from the side but still different
Hard to imagine a rifleman, already engaging a target, stopping and taking the time to rise and fire from the far more difficult standing position instead of prone, the easiest and most stable position—not to mention needlessly making himself way more vulnerable to return fire
Hes shaking from adrenaline, and said on twitter he was zoomed in while recording (never ever do this btw...for best quality just take normal video which you can zoom in on later).
Heres a better quality version thats also gets rid of the shaky cam. Also includes more footage of the guy trying to kick ppl out of the area.
https://x.com/pldagenais/status/1818101582925349039
To be clear that video is "upscaled and stabilized". It does have the text removed which is good though.
Would be nice to have the original original.
The guy who took the video says he will release a better quality version without watermarks soon.
Thank you for the link and the better quality viewing.
Trump should have been ushered off that stage long before the first shots. The USSS wanted him dead. I would like to know if the police reported the threat to the USSS when they were told of someone on the roof and WHO it was reported to. Will we ever know the truth?
I heard the police and secret service didn't have any communication set up between them at all.
Do they even follow the Incident Command System? They should.
A previous agency (for which I liasoned) followed ICS protocol while providing operational security for the Olympics when held in a US state.
Was the incident commander next to, or in immediate communication with, the cia commander or liason? Even if you're operating on different channels, it's ridiculous that this took many minutes to resolve, and that the shooter even had a chance to fire at shots AT ALL.
At best, this is manifest incompetence on the part of police and/or commanders, liasons, or both. Yes, things can get chaotic and confusing, but these guys (should) be used to this. It's part of THEIR JOB. I guarantee any 911 dispatcher worth their salt is absolutely aghast at the magnitude of the fustercluck of security response.
Worst case, Trump was targeted. In which case heads need to roll.
ONE attempt out of HOW MANY?
Like watching a movie!
Remember, Q told us that Trump has received more attempts of assassination, by DEEP STATE actors embedded within our inteligence/political systems….
Than ANY OTHER PRESIDENT!
They shot a MISSILE from a ROGUE SUB off a US Military Air Force base at AF1….
They implanted devices not even publicly KNOWN…. That could go UNDETECTED and cause PHYSICAL HARM/AILMENT…… WITHIN THE OVAL OFFICE!
Where’s the impeachment on that!? Makes blowjobs at the desk seem like a wank!
Most importantly Q asks us, WHAT IF ANY of these attempts were exposed and made public to WE THE PEOPLE?
That agencies within the system can just go rogue and target and kill ANYONE they disagree with, or challenges their hold on POWER…..
DESTRUCTION OF THE OLD GUARD….
WHOLE DISEASED TEMPLE….
DQ+17+Q+
MAKE IT RAIN!
Amen, Just like the missile they claimed was a helo.
https://greatawakening.win/p/17txMS5oDi/newly-released-video-from-trump-/c/
I'm still not 100% certain the first three shots (slow, deliberate cadence) are from the same gun as the next five (rapid cadence).
I listened to the shot sequence in this video about 20-30 times in rapid succession. Doing this with any audio clip usually reveals small sound variations that were missed in the first dozen hearings, as the brain tires of hearing the same exact set of sound waves and begins to detect tiny, previously unnoticed details among them. (Great for learning musical phrases too :)
Not only do the two salvos have MARKEDLY different pacing between shots, which is extremely noticeable on first hearing; but the ECHO of the five-salvo, which is plainly audible only after the fifth shot, sounds slightly different (lower pitch, and without the very high-pitched flourish at the end of the echo) from that of each of the first three slow shots.
Then obviously the next shot right after the five (SNAP with almost no echo) is from a different rifle, as is the one, somewhat fainter, ten seconds later. Those could be from the same gun as each other, or two different guns.
Yeah the first 3 sounds different. It's not as noticeable as some of the other videos out there. The shooter in the window hypothesis is getting stronger. Since he was directly in between Trump and the shooters the first shots aren't muffled like audio from the side but still different
Thank you for sharing this infprmation.
Peak Prosperity are doing some fantastic analysis work with the data we have https://youtu.be/J9-VmwM3qzY?feature=shared
Hard to imagine a rifleman, already engaging a target, stopping and taking the time to rise and fire from the far more difficult standing position instead of prone, the easiest and most stable position—not to mention needlessly making himself way more vulnerable to return fire
Stop shaking Dave you are making me sick!
Hes shaking from adrenaline, and said on twitter he was zoomed in while recording (never ever do this btw...for best quality just take normal video which you can zoom in on later).
A much clearer stabilized version is here:
https://x.com/pldagenais/status/1818101582925349039
I agree.