132
posted ago by Rocketeer ago by Rocketeer +132 / -0

I have believed for several years now that there is a plan at work - not the Q plan (although that may also be in play) but a plan by God.

Part of this is because there's a pattern - too often to be chance - of every plot to take President Trump out once and for all (impeachments, court trials, and now an assassination attempt) ending more or less like Wile E. Coyote's schemes in a Road Runner cartoon, with the schemers taking an anvil to the top of the head while Trump remains unscathed.

Also, the timing of Ruth Bader Ginsberg's death strikes me as providential. She died more or less exactly as late as possible without allowing a liberal Justice to replace her and keep Roe v. Wade alive, as if she was mercifully allowed - perhaps even through miraculous extension of her life - the maximum time possible to live and potentially repent without getting in the way of Roe v. Wade ending.

Another part is because in the depths of despair after the 2020 election theft, I prayed for signs for what to expect, and received what I believe are indeed signs from God, not with any specific details regarding exactly what will happen, but confirming that His mercy is at work in this nation and that Trump is involved in His plan.

Knowing that God likes to turn the plans of the wicked against them, I have thought of one possible scenario that may play out as regards the upcoming election. To be clear, the following scenario is pure speculation, but I think it's quite possible.

Here's the scenario:

The election results (possibly after a multiple-day counting delay) come back showing Trump as the winner, despite any fraud at play in the election.

The Democrats and MSM immediately start crying fraud. They spread the narrative that Trump stole the election, and file lawsuits.

The courts throw the lawsuits out for laches or lack of standing, in keeping with their actions in 2020.

On January 6, 2025, Kamala Harris (if she is still Vice President) or whoever is Vice President at the time may want - and maybe even attempt - to avoid certifying the election results, and perhaps others present (especially Jamie Raskin) do as well.

A relevant quote regarding Raskin from an American Thinker article:

Democrat Congressman Jamie Raskin has also revealed what appears to be a Plan B in the event the CISA/FBI election night plan that is disguised as a “warning” fails to prevent a Trump victory. In a clip that deserves far more scrutiny, Raskin painted a grim picture of how January 6th, 2025 (the day Congress would meet to officially certify Trump’s general election win) might unfold. According to Raskin, it will be “up to us (Congress) to tell the rampaging Trump mobs that he’s disqualified, and then we’ll need bodyguards for everybody due to civil war conditions.” Raskin alludes to language regarding insurrection found in section 3 of the 14th Amendment as a means of disqualifying Trump from taking office even if he wins the election. In layman’s terms, section 3 bars anybody who has ever engaged in insurrection from holding public office.

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2024/08/will_democrats_repeat_the_fraud_of_2020.html

However, due to Trump's acquittal in his second impeachment trial, any attempt to disqualify him under the 14th Amendment fails. More importantly, Trump's victory is certified because Congress' 2022 rule changes (a response to January 6) come back to bite them:

On Jan. 6, Trump targeted Congress’ ratification of the Electoral College’s vote. He tried to exploit the vice president’s role in reading out the states’ electors to get Mike Pence to block Biden from becoming the next president by omitting some states Biden won from the roll. The new provisions make clear that the vice president’s responsibilities in the process are merely ceremonial and that the vice president has no say in determining who actually won the election.

The new legislation also raises the threshold required for members of Congress to object to certifying the electors. Before, only one member of the House and Senate respectively had to object to force a roll call vote on a state’s electors. That helped make objections to new presidents something of a routine partisan tactic — Democrats objected to certifying both of George W. Bush’s elections and Trump’s in 2016.

Those objections, however, were mainly symbolic and came after Democrats had conceded that the Republican candidates won the presidency. On Jan. 6, 2021, Republicans forced a vote on certifying Biden’s wins in Arizona and Pennsylvania even after the violent attack on the Capitol, as Trump continued to insist falsely that he won the election. That led some members of Congress to worry the process could be too easily manipulated.

Under the new rules, one-fifth of each chamber would be required to force a vote on states’ slates of electors.

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/congress-approves-new-election-certification-rules-in-response-to-jan-6

A massive (openly) leftist mob is present in Washington D.C. on January 6 in order to protest the certification of Trump's victory. They commit violence and destruction, and perhaps storm the Capitol building. They may even commit acts that fall under the legal definition of insurrection. The media, of course, defends them.

In short, the scenario is one in which everything that happened (or was alleged to happen, as in the case of the January 6 "insurrection") in the 2020 election and its aftermath happens in reverse, with the Democrats and Deep State getting a taste of their own medicine at each step of the way.

Again, it's pure speculation. But it's possible, and quite frankly, would be delicious to see unfold.