When Trump Introduced RFK Jr. At His Rally, It Impacted This Formerly TDS Lib To See The Truth
(twitter.com)
💊 RED PILL MATERIAL 💊
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (44)
sorted by:
I don't support gun control either but I recognize why some people might. Gun control probably would reduce gun deaths but it would come at the cost of individuals having the ability to protect themselves, not to mention the other issues.
You have exactly zero facts to back up your statement.
Correct !
This part is factual
A lot of what we think we were made to believe about RFK Jr is not accurate. Lets just say that his views on most of these issues is not black & white like other Liberals.
https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/4072813-rfk-jr-argues-gun-control-cannot-meaningfully-reduce-gun-violence/
That's a great article. He basically said:
He's not taking away people's guns
He will not infringe the 2nd amendment or the constitution
Reduce gun violence through gun control is not realistic
He'll get behind an assault weapons ban if there's bipartisan support. But this is political talk, as he knows the chance of that happening is very low. What else do you want him to say?
Yep. I realized a while ago RFK is like trump in someways. In this example he says words that can be easily twisted around by both main and alt media, but if you listen to him in full context you get a whole different picture.
It's amazing that people here don't realize this. So many have bought into b.s. about this man
Number 4. If he is willing to speak anything but his mind he is not worth voting for. Have we learned nothing?
Meaning "assault weapons".
Can't forget the quotes, because a regular AR-15 such as any American might own to defend themselves, their homestead and their neighbors isn't any kind of "assault weapon".
Stop using “assault weapons” narrative in our language will go far to stop the narrative. No such thing as assault weapons. It’s a weapon or it’s not.
Gun control may save a life but the cost would be many others. Im not trading 10s or 100s of my fellow countrymen to save one life and allow tyranny to blossom. Weve seen what gun control does in Canada, Europe and Australia.
Kids these days.. sheesh. No concept of downstream consequences.
That's what happens when society downplays and propagandizes people into not understanding how a slippery slope functions.
This is my #1 reason why I oppose gun control. I really don't care what the gun death statistics are. That point is moot to me. I prize liberty so much higher than safety that I can't even see it from up here.
Upvoted but let's call it what it is. Gun confiscation.
I said I don't agree with gun control in the same comment. The second amendment is non negotiable.
Gun control wouldn't reduce gun deaths know how I know? Look at Chicago, NY, LA. The government put those guns there. The government would put guns wherever they need them. Absolutely no way would the government back down on taking from us without the 2nd amendment.
There is no evidence and there's no studies, there's nothing to prove that gun control would reduce deaths.