Screenshots: Kamala Harris’s Interesting Choice of Earrings During Last Night's Debate—They Look Identical to the Nova H1 Audio ...
It was obvious after the first 15 minutes of the presidential debate tonight that it was President Trump versus Kamala and two ABC hack reporters. The ABC moderators repeatedly “fact-checked” and “fake fact-checked” President Trump during the debate. This ...
Could this qualify for a 4 year delta?
u/#q4657
Imagine getting the questions ahead of time, having 2 moderators helping you out, having someone telling you what to say through an audio earring, and still losing that bad??
And that little girl ... was me.
This variant of the audio earrings looks more like the ones that Kamala is wearing:
https://nitter.poast.org/pic/orig/media%2FGXKHpc_XEAA_lX5.jpg
Same variant is shown this article: https://www.tomsguide.com/news/i-used-these-new-smart-earrings-to-listen-to-music-they-totally-surprised-me ( link provided by FreeEagle1 in this post: https://greatawakening.win/p/1994p183gD/kamala-wearing-audio-earrings-du/c/ )
https://www.tiffany.com/jewelry/earrings/tiffany-hardwear-double-pearl-hinged-earrings-in-sterling-silver-64048716
Kamala even states she has pearls on.
Claims she is wearing the Tiffany pearl earrings above.
The earrings appear to have come from Tiffany & Co and are called Double Pearl Hinged Earrings in Sterling Silver. They retail for $800
https://www.distractify.com/p/kamala-harris-earrings-conspiracy-theory
This looks like the earing she was wearing if it was the Nova.... (her earings connect at the bottom looped up like the Tiffany ones) But you can change the looks and alter them and still have the capability of hearing.
Could combine the Tiffany and audio Nova so its easier to claim debunk.
https://nitter.poast.org/pic/orig/media%2FGXKHpc_XEAA_lX5.jpg
It’s obvious the “pearl” on Kamala earrings are much larger in proportion than the Tiffany earrings they are claiming she wore. It’s likely they modified the earpiece with the Tiffany earrings in an attempt to disguise them. Even they wouldn’t be dumb enough to just use the earpiece as-is it would be too obvious. This gives them plausible deniability.
That's what I was thinking.
Also gives us nothing in terms of proof.
The woman in your link is wearing the Nova H1 BEHIND her regular earrings. Not the same. Please learn to look with a critical eye. That means trying to DISPROVE anything you WANT to be true before you believe it's true.
What if (yeah, a stretch) but what if Trump's team was totally aware of this and was able to intercept it? Can you imagine the firestorm? Dems and MSM will call it fake and AI, but it will be true.
As a SME, Not sure why they didn't? They operate on rf frequencies, so it could have very easily been jammed or intercepted. Trust me when I say this... we have the equipment to jam rf frequencies.
Agreed. There might be encryption, but with sufficient MIPS and motivation, that can be overcome.
Could jam, listen in, or over-ride the signal for a hilarious "Impractical Jokers: Debate Edition".
Even encrypted, it has to carry on an RF frequencies. That's what gets jammed. Once the freq is plugged, that's end of story. Even that would be a disaster for them. Now manipulating the message would be hilarious, but stopping the message would be enough.
Sure. Jamming is easy.
P.S. Also, it's Bluetooth. So it's Eurofag Cryptography. No big whup. The last good thing they made was Enigma.
I will say as well I know for a fact our ability to jam, intercept, and real time alter is very advanced. The things people think are advanced today were actually advanced in 2000. I will go out on a limb and say they were at the very least listening in on her and recording it. This debate might have been a trap for them. Part of the plan? Maybe.
That my fren is a great perspective to contemplate. Bugging the buggers! LOL Seriously, that's a an angle I overlooked and with our technology we have today could be very plausible indeed. Not only listening, but recording it with video presentation with undeniable markers for proofs throughout? If so, as Q says... these people are stupid...
I'm smoking hopium like mad right now. My eyes are bugged out and my hair is standing on end. I figured if anything this is totally plausible. Do you think he's got assets in the "Biden" administration? I do! I think that fake administration has been well infiltrated by the good guys and are feeding him intel.
Think military intel and who they directly report too... Nov3/Jan6 was an insurection coup against a sitting POTUS, thus allowing the Military to be deployed as dictated by law. He had to allow the steal so people would wake up as he systematically exposed them. Trust Trump when he says they caught them all and he has all the evidence. Yes, I think there are plants inside, but I'm of the camp where the military has been evidence monitoring everyone who are involved. Why did Q tell us "when you have their playbook..." ? 😎🇺🇲Recently POTUS (Trump) told them they will be facing harsh criminal sentences should they continue to keep subverting the election laws, etc.. buckle up fren, let's see what happens.
none of this matters
Hmmm, I guess the word identical means different things to different people. They don't look identical to me.
Agreed, clearly these are not identical! That said Kamala's COULD have been modified or custom made to use this technology.
Don't let something like logic get in the way of a tantalizing story, though.
Can’t spell dems without cheating
Thanks handshake 🥸
Clearly these are not identical, however Kamala's COULD have been using this technology.
These earrings have pearls, but on Kamala's earrings there are no pearls but polygons of what appears to be polished glass or diamond, as can be seen in this screenshot: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GXKc518XcAAEbWG?format=jpg&name=large
I see round pearls. There is more pics than the one you used.
If you zoom out on the pic that i used, it also looks just like a round pearl, but if you zoom in on it, you can see that some edges are polished off, much like polished glass or diamonds
That screenshot alone proves she’s lying. The pearl is much larger than the pearls on the Tiffany earrings.
I agree. The pearl in the Tiffany’s is set inside the metal frame. Kamala’s are much bigger and protrude outside the frame like the Novas
https://www.tiffany.com/jewelry/earrings/tiffany-hardwear-double-pearl-hinged-earrings-in-sterling-silver-64048716
Kamala even states she has pearls on.
Claims she is wearing the Tiffany pearl earrings above.
https://www.distractify.com/p/kamala-harris-earrings-conspiracy-theory
This looks like the earing she was wearing if it was the Nova.... (her earings connect at the bottom looped up like the Tiffany ones) But you can change the looks and alter them and still have the capability of hearing.
Could combine the Tiffany and audio Nova so its easier to claim debunk.
https://nitter.poast.org/pic/orig/media%2FGXKHpc_XEAA_lX5.jpg
I'm saying it's not exactly the same as Kamala's earrings. although the general form of the pins bending backwards is the same as Kamala's, but the object above the pins is made from a different material than pearl.
So the reported "debunked" status is wrong.
"Debunked" would be, when they would show earrings without the Nova-technology looking exactly the same as Kamala's earrings, and this isn't it.