The moderators also didn't ask Walz to specifically deny the sex trafficking. They only asked if he wanted to deny "drug mules and other items brought up."
I was talking to an older female Democrat the other day, and got onto the topic of human trafficking, after I brought it up, she laughed at me, said that's not a real thing and condescendingly asked if I really believed that.
That right there is an actual example of privilege, non of this white privilege, make privilege etc... bullshit. To live a life so carefree and absent of dangers, that you can be so ignornorant of the actual evils of the world, that you can dismiss them so downright. And an overall terrible asymmetrical viewpoint to have, oh my life is absent of dangers and I'm all about peace love and joy so therefore that's how everyone thinks and operates.
The blind. The dumb. The ignorant.
There's a reason why the dems throw their support to these [useful idiots] people.
A contrarian may suggest that debating 3 on 1, in such an obvious display, and prevailing, makes the 1 look 3 times stronger, and the 3 look as weak as one third.
That's called winning in the eyes of the audience.
We like winners.
Also, there are not two parties. The GOP and Dems are one party.
The two parties we have are DC (and their propaganda machines - including debate moderators), and We The People.
They were hoping to trap Vance by asking him if he was in favor of separating families by deporting a parent when the children were citizens. I wish someone would call these people out: "The parent is here illegally. They can take their children with them when they go. If they are separated, that's their decision."
Did you notice in Walz’s reply he said “the drug mules for minors isn’t true.” He didn’t deny the sex trafficking.
💯% u/DagnyDocket 👈🏻
The moderators also didn't ask Walz to specifically deny the sex trafficking. They only asked if he wanted to deny "drug mules and other items brought up."
Disgusting.
He said many things that he left open like this.
I was talking to an older female Democrat the other day, and got onto the topic of human trafficking, after I brought it up, she laughed at me, said that's not a real thing and condescendingly asked if I really believed that.
That right there is an actual example of privilege, non of this white privilege, make privilege etc... bullshit. To live a life so carefree and absent of dangers, that you can be so ignornorant of the actual evils of the world, that you can dismiss them so downright. And an overall terrible asymmetrical viewpoint to have, oh my life is absent of dangers and I'm all about peace love and joy so therefore that's how everyone thinks and operates.
The blind. The dumb. The ignorant.
There's a reason why the dems throw their support to these [useful idiots] people.
As usual, Pravda running cover for the DNC.
In the future, the GOP should refuse any debates held by Pravda.
Who cares if Pravda and the Commies scream about it, it's nothing but GOP candidates debating more than one person at a time.
A contrarian may suggest that debating 3 on 1, in such an obvious display, and prevailing, makes the 1 look 3 times stronger, and the 3 look as weak as one third.
That's called winning in the eyes of the audience.
We like winners.
Also, there are not two parties. The GOP and Dems are one party.
The two parties we have are DC (and their propaganda machines - including debate moderators), and We The People.
It's US vs Them.
Exactly
They were hoping to trap Vance by asking him if he was in favor of separating families by deporting a parent when the children were citizens. I wish someone would call these people out: "The parent is here illegally. They can take their children with them when they go. If they are separated, that's their decision."
Walz looks and acts like a classic pedophile. Coach involved with young kids what a creep.
Wait until his tied to Penn States Jerry Sandusky come out.
Yup. Him and Jerry in the showers with kids.
There's allegedly some audio proof that's going to be sprung very soon.
Heard that as well