ranked choice on the ballot always happens when the commies feel their vote rigging power is strong enough. there are tiers to vote rigging. the lowest tier stays under the radar but has low strength. that strength is usually high enough to "vote" in a stronger tier. ranked choice is a stronger tier. they wouldn't try it unless they have some rigging capability in place. in reality- ranked choice should be made illegal. nominal vote rigging coupled with active ranked choice is a much more powerful rigging method and more difficult to block.
The whole concept of voting in our election system, according to the founding principles of our Constitutional Republic, was 1 vote for one individual candidate. Ranked voting is a scheme that is not in accordance with a Republic government.
Ranked-choice voting is inherently unfair. Voters who select unpopular candidates as their first preference effectively vote again, sometimes multiple times. Why should some voters get numerous votes just because their first preference is unpopular?
With ranked voting, not all votes count. This goes against the principle that every vote counts. Ranked voting also makes cheating even easier, and counting even more complex.
In reality, ranked-choice voting is a scheme that makes it harder for independent candidates to win and is regularly being used by left-wing groups to undermine conservative candidates.
Sadly, many Americans lack confidence in the election process. While progressives offer RCV as a solution to this problem, such a needlessly complicated voting system leads to voter confusion, lower turnout, and slower election results. Strengthening the trust that the American people have in the election process should not be a partisan issue. Banning ranked-choice voting is a measure that everyone ought to support to protect election integrity.
It should also raise alarms that the 3 biggest financial backers of ranked voting are the George Soros-funded Open Society Foundations, Jennifer and Jonathan Allan Soros Foundation, and Soros Fund Charitable Foundation.
As our founders knew, one person, one vote is the best, and most fair method to decide elections. It’s worked for Americans for generations. There’s no good reason to change things now.
There's a lot of $$ being spent to defeat it. Vote YES to delete ranked choice voting!
And until it's gone, mark your choice for each office all the way across the ballot. This ensures that no one else can be inserted by another person, and that your vote will not be "transferred" to another candidate.
I couldn't sleep last night so was watching archaeology shows on BoobTube. EVERY SINGLE COMMERCIAL BLOCK started off with a ridiculous "Yes on Prop 1!" ad that wasn't skippable. Here in ID they are framing it as having "open primaries again, just like it used to be", and don't mention the ranked choice angle at all.
Ranked choice is bad. Ref 2022 AK house race. It’s a way for the deep state to manipulate what should be easy wins for team Patriot. But don’t fret, with the upcoming Trump 47 Administration, we will get back to same day elections and real ID.
Once you vote it in it’s almost impossible to eliminate it. In Alaska, I feel it got voted in due to all the false mail in ballots. Now, Nov 5 vote Yes on Two, will eliminate it. The vote Two is grassroots with little to no money. Vote no on two to save rank voting. The outside money is up to and over the 8 million dollar to save rank voting. Ugly.
I see these "newcomer" soy boy freaks who couldn't defend their children from a moth up-selling Ranked-Choice. Exactly the way Rinos and Demoncrats worm their way in.
We can't let them win, Please get into ID, AZ, CO, AZ, NV, city tied Facebook Groups, and FIGHT, FIGHT, FIGHT!
https://www.heritage.org/election-integrity/report/ranked-choice-voting-bad-choice
Basically it makes it easier for them to divide the vote so that their guy doesn’t have to get as many votes to win. It’s how they’ve rigged Cananadian elections for some time now.
The solution isn’t only to get better candidates voted in, which is the lie they put this system in place with, though we can’t have people holding office en masse who defy the law, but also to get out the word of how to hold them accountable to what we want done while they’re in office, and to reteach ourselves what jurisdictions we are in and why that matters.
I’ve been trying to promote christine_grab and Martin Geddes’ works here, as they seem to be in the right path. Martin is even having success in ENGLAND with this, which is much farther gone than we are. It’s quite possible this could even work in non-common law countries, as there must be some legal basis underpinning all tyrannical claims of authority.
ranked choice on the ballot always happens when the commies feel their vote rigging power is strong enough. there are tiers to vote rigging. the lowest tier stays under the radar but has low strength. that strength is usually high enough to "vote" in a stronger tier. ranked choice is a stronger tier. they wouldn't try it unless they have some rigging capability in place. in reality- ranked choice should be made illegal. nominal vote rigging coupled with active ranked choice is a much more powerful rigging method and more difficult to block.
Ranked choice is unconstitutional, regardless of what the corrupted courts rule. Idaho needs to vote no to Proposition 1.
The whole concept of voting in our election system, according to the founding principles of our Constitutional Republic, was 1 vote for one individual candidate. Ranked voting is a scheme that is not in accordance with a Republic government.
Ranked-choice voting is inherently unfair. Voters who select unpopular candidates as their first preference effectively vote again, sometimes multiple times. Why should some voters get numerous votes just because their first preference is unpopular?
With ranked voting, not all votes count. This goes against the principle that every vote counts. Ranked voting also makes cheating even easier, and counting even more complex.
In reality, ranked-choice voting is a scheme that makes it harder for independent candidates to win and is regularly being used by left-wing groups to undermine conservative candidates.
Sadly, many Americans lack confidence in the election process. While progressives offer RCV as a solution to this problem, such a needlessly complicated voting system leads to voter confusion, lower turnout, and slower election results. Strengthening the trust that the American people have in the election process should not be a partisan issue. Banning ranked-choice voting is a measure that everyone ought to support to protect election integrity.
It should also raise alarms that the 3 biggest financial backers of ranked voting are the George Soros-funded Open Society Foundations, Jennifer and Jonathan Allan Soros Foundation, and Soros Fund Charitable Foundation.
As our founders knew, one person, one vote is the best, and most fair method to decide elections. It’s worked for Americans for generations. There’s no good reason to change things now.
Great information in your post! All Truths.
What in the constitution disallows it?
And Nevada
Correct, I had that on there but reworded it and accidentally deleted Nevada. Thanks!
Let’s hope Alaska can vote it out!
There's a lot of $$ being spent to defeat it. Vote YES to delete ranked choice voting!
And until it's gone, mark your choice for each office all the way across the ballot. This ensures that no one else can be inserted by another person, and that your vote will not be "transferred" to another candidate.
Prayers on this. It is aweful. Thankfully it will be Peltola and Begich since Dalatrom dropped off.
Share far and wide!
I couldn't sleep last night so was watching archaeology shows on BoobTube. EVERY SINGLE COMMERCIAL BLOCK started off with a ridiculous "Yes on Prop 1!" ad that wasn't skippable. Here in ID they are framing it as having "open primaries again, just like it used to be", and don't mention the ranked choice angle at all.
Holy crap they can do this?! That’s the opposite of a fair election—it’s so complicated that rigging would be easy. WOW it should be illegal.
Ranked choice is bad. Ref 2022 AK house race. It’s a way for the deep state to manipulate what should be easy wins for team Patriot. But don’t fret, with the upcoming Trump 47 Administration, we will get back to same day elections and real ID.
Hope this gets stickied. Deported for the request & Anons need to know so they can share.
It’s absolutely incredible how quickly they invaded Idaho.
10-15 years ago, these issues didn’t even slightly exist.
Yep. I had considered moving there a wile ago. I don't know that any red state is really better/worse than the others right now.
Supreme Court said it: one man, one vote. How this has survived legal challenges, I do not know.
upvoted for “numbnut”
Time to shutdown these asshats promoting it.
Once you vote it in it’s almost impossible to eliminate it. In Alaska, I feel it got voted in due to all the false mail in ballots. Now, Nov 5 vote Yes on Two, will eliminate it. The vote Two is grassroots with little to no money. Vote no on two to save rank voting. The outside money is up to and over the 8 million dollar to save rank voting. Ugly.
I see these "newcomer" soy boy freaks who couldn't defend their children from a moth up-selling Ranked-Choice. Exactly the way Rinos and Demoncrats worm their way in. We can't let them win, Please get into ID, AZ, CO, AZ, NV, city tied Facebook Groups, and FIGHT, FIGHT, FIGHT! https://www.heritage.org/election-integrity/report/ranked-choice-voting-bad-choice
Can someone explain to me how ranked choice voting is used as a method of stealing elections?
Basically it makes it easier for them to divide the vote so that their guy doesn’t have to get as many votes to win. It’s how they’ve rigged Cananadian elections for some time now.
The solution isn’t only to get better candidates voted in, which is the lie they put this system in place with, though we can’t have people holding office en masse who defy the law, but also to get out the word of how to hold them accountable to what we want done while they’re in office, and to reteach ourselves what jurisdictions we are in and why that matters.
I’ve been trying to promote christine_grab and Martin Geddes’ works here, as they seem to be in the right path. Martin is even having success in ENGLAND with this, which is much farther gone than we are. It’s quite possible this could even work in non-common law countries, as there must be some legal basis underpinning all tyrannical claims of authority.