Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
GreatAwakening Where We Go Qne, We Go All!
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

128
The first female President of these United States of America should be worthy. Someone like Margaret Thatcher. Not this empty brained empty suit they are planning to install. WHAT AN EMBARRASSMENT! (media.greatawakening.win)
posted 1 year ago by ArmyLady 1 year ago by ArmyLady +128 / -0
26 comments download share
26 comments share download save hide report block hide replies
Comments (26)
sorted by:
▲ 8 ▼
– bcfromfl 8 points 1 year ago +8 / -0

The sexes are not equal, and it's time we stop pretending they are. We need to stop making rules for exceptions, and instead make rules that encompass all...or nearly all. Women in government is just a bad idea. Might there be one or two who would do OK? Maybe. But you can't open Pandora's Box for that opportunity, and allow the masses to flood all the positions.

We've tried this experiment, and we have feckless, inept, impulsive women in government, to go along with all the feckless, inept, impulsive men. If it's just men, though, it's easier to police them without the women's card being thrown into the mix. Women, in general, lack the capacity for forethought, and the essence of consequences.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– ArmyLady [S] 5 points 1 year ago +5 / -0

You are not wrong.

There are some good conservative women trying hard with every ounce of their being, and deserve a vote over any RINO or any dem.

But a good conservative man, I would prefer.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– pearlrevolver 6 points 1 year ago +6 / -0

So you agree with bcfromfl that women 'lack the capacity for forethought'? ArmyLady, you seem intelligent to me. Why sell yourself and all of the intelligent, conservative women who are out there fighting for Americans' freedoms short to appease an anonymous commenter? Because a man is preferrable to lead the country that somehow diminishes our capacity to join alongside men in the battlefield of ideas and intellectual discourse?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– ArmyLady [S] 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

Of course I count us among the intelligent conservative women who are indeed fighting with everything we have! As we would do for our own children, we would fight to the death for our Republic.

NO we do INDEED as our female ancestors did, fight alongside our men in the "battlefield of ideas and intellectual discourse."

INDEED no number of us have influenced the votes of our men!!

Our contribution is needed and valued. We do not accept brain dead empty suit dems to represent US!

SOME women do indeed lack critical reasoning skills. Not us!

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– artyjulia 6 points 1 year ago +6 / -0

Fecking Thatcher....She took an experimental and untried economic theory as the gospel truth and implemented across the board regardless of any consequences.

It all hinged on control of the money supply which they could not do at all so they blamed inflation on the countries woes, they never even thought of saying they made a mistake and said "there is no alternative" TINA.

She was an admirer of the trickle down theory so she gave billions away to the financiers and bankers but could not understand for the life of her why they invested it all in offshore accounts, it was quite beyond her to grasp that bankers were not altruistic at all.

But she kept on giving all these billion away to them despite knowing they wouldn't reinvest it in the country. She went stark raving mad in 1990 and was removed from power

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– ArmyLady [S] 4 points 1 year ago +4 / -0

She, Reagan and the Pope however brought down godless atheist Communism, at least for a few years of world PEACE.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– artyjulia 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

She did nothing, that was all down to Mikhael Gorbachev.

At the time the wall came down she was out of power and before that she was borderline insane.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– freedomfountain 5 points 1 year ago +5 / -0

Can we not invoke Margaret Thatcher as the exemplary female leader, please. She was a war monger and very good friends with Pedo Jimmy Saville.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– deleted 4 points 1 year ago +4 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– ArmyLady [S] 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

Good candidate, but not in the caliber of President IMHO.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– deleted 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0
▲ 3 ▼
– ArmyLady [S] 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

May she indeed have a future in our Republican majority! I also admire her courage!

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– M42D 4 points 1 year ago +4 / -0

If Thatcher were still alive, today would have been her 99th birthday 🎉

I was just a couple of weeks old when she became our PM. I've always said her influence rubbed off on me taking shape over my years in many ways.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– SaltyBrit 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

If you were a bit older, you would have seen what Thatcher did to towns and communities across Britain. Ask the coalminers what they think of her.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Hakencruze 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Coal mines were being heavily subsidised which shot the price of coal up it was cheaper to import than continue to mine plus the fact the uk was converting to gas and coal demand was diminishing, it was all down to basic economics

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– AmazingFlightLizard 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

If Tulsi was less of a gun-grabby climate cultist, she might not be an awful start. She seemed pretty solid in her interview with Shawn Ryan.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– NewAllOverAgain 4 points 1 year ago +4 / -0

Tulsi is very intelligent, but then so is Bobby, and yet they don't comprehend that the NWO disbursing multiple chem compounds into our atmosphere that increase the temperatures on the surface of the planet, continuously for decades, is what has affected our "climate". Any yet, the sea levels have not changed in 300 years. Go figure!

The worst polluters in the world, are not penalized, but they try to crush us. Are we not tired of being singled out for this shit?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– BakasEverywhere 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

Are we no longer wanting Ivanka to follow her dad's lead and become President, too?

I remember when she had a pretty solid cheerleading squad on this board.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– ArmyLady [S] 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

What qualifications does she really have?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Hope4thefuture 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

Funny I was thinking the same thing today. She is no Margaret Thatcher, that is for sure!

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– BerlinWallCrosser 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

Trivia question: Who was the first woman on a major party ticket to win the election for on of the two top spots? Answer: No one. Think hasn’t happened yet since Kamala didn’t WIN in the 2020 election. Her party stole it for her.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– The0utlawRobinHood 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

Margaret Thatcher was a competent party politician. But if you want to pick a female Brit with true leadership qualities, you're better of going with Boudica.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– ArmyLady [S] 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

Who do we have though? I can't think of anyone who deserves the title of the first woman President! Pretty tough role to fill! Can't be an ordinary woman. Has to be someone of the likes of Washington, Lincoln, Reagan, Trump. Do you see anyone even close? even close to Trump?? I don't see any woman of that caliber.

We have some great women Republicans, but none I think up to that level, and the dems are worse and positively evil. EVIL!

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– The0utlawRobinHood 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

Who do we have though?

In terms of policy and leadership ability, I'd have to say no one.

As far as attitude and willingness to buck the deep state / cabal, I might give thought to Cynthia McKinney. Although there are numerous areas where I disagree with her as well. (And if she ever made it in, they'd shoot her too.)

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Maroon 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

Sorry, but there shouldn't be a woman president ever. I don't really want them in any level of government, not even the bureaucracy.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Luminescent 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

Joan Rivers pointed out Obama was our first gay president and we saw how that ended...

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– RonPaulRepublican 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Fuck Margaret Thatcher

permalink save report block reply

Welcome


The Great Awakening


We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.


WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q


Welcome to the Digital Battlefield — Together We Win

Rules


Q Supporters

This is The Great Awakening. Our community is international, focused on helping ourselves and others walk away from the programming, and return our governments to "by the people, for the people!"



Follow the Law

No posts or comments that violate laws in your jurisdiction or the United States. The Feds are always watching!



No Bad Behavior!

No doxing, including revealing personal information of non-public figures, as well as addresses, phone numbers, etc. of public figures. All GAW users must adhere to the highest standards of conduct, whichever .WIN they are on. If we are notified by other moderators of incivil behavior on other .WINs, you WILL be banned here!



Civil Discussion ONLY**

They want you divided.

They want you labeled by race, religion, class, sex, etc.

Divided you are weak [no collective power].

Divided you attack each other and miss the true target [them].



No PAYtriots/No Self Promotion

Linking or promoting merchandise, fundraising, or spamming personal websites, blogs, or channels is not permitted. Do not attempt to profit from Q or advertise for those who do. Peace is the prize. We do it for free.



Questions and Concerns

All moderation questions and concerns should be submitted via modmail. DO NOT GRIEF the mods.



Expand your thinking

Remember, this .WIN is the public face of the Great Awakening, and, as a member here, you agree to represent the Great Awakening movement against Globalism, Communism and Progressive Insanity in the best, most positive way possible. NOTE: Your comments and posts may become news. Keep it classy!

This is not a 'fringe conspiracy' site: Visit https://conspiracies.win if that's your thing!



No doomers or shills

If you can't use common sense, you'll get banned without hesitation. If you're a shill, you fall under this rule. If you're a doomer, you fall under this rule as you just add garbage to the site like the other two. This includes forum sliding.



General Rules

  • Mods will issue NO warnings, followed by temporary bans and/or permanent bans. DO NOT GRIEF THE MODS.

  • Keep posts related to topics Q has raised or that are current.

  • Keep post duplication (especially from other .WINs) to a minimum.

  • HIGH EFFORT, HIGH-INFO posts only! Please respect other readers' time. Please use descriptive titles. No URLs in titles, pls. No clickbait.

  • No fame-fagging; no, "your" post did not get removed! Were you the original author?? Eyes on the prize, people!

  • Memes encouraged, but no low-quality, low-info posts.

  • Keep it honest and accurate.

  • GAW Supporters ONLY. (Sorry, the train had no brakes.)

  • Handshake noobs will be scrutinized by their Q knowledge, sincerity, and respect.

  • Remember, your conduct here represents the Q movement! OUR ENEMIES ARE WATCHING!

  • Please direct all complaints to modmail first!


Resources


WELCOME TO THE DIGITAL BATTLEFIELD


"River of Search" script:


GAW post formatting tips


Q Research (Q only posts at 8kun)


Q post archives (qagg.news) others 1 2 3 4


Browse Drops from the beginning


QProofs.com


Learn to read the Q map


Book of Q Proofs v1.3 (pdf)


Law of War & Majic Eyes Qnly Resources


Trumps twitter archive


POTUS: The Calm Before The Storm


Pedosta and DNC dumps


GIFs & QPosts


Poll Post Format


SPY ON US! See: mod Logs


The Greatest Show on Earth!


New to Q? "The Earth Chronicles Ep 12: Q & The White-Hat Op: What's Real, What's Not?"


Moderators

  • dropgun
  • catsfive
  • AutoMod
  • Filter
  • parallax_crow
  • Fatality
  • BasedCitizen
  • Qanaut
  • and 8 more...
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - whmbz (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy