From Jack STRAW on X, Q is MIL INTEL
(twitter.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (75)
sorted by:
wiki
His co-authoring of the satanist work is easily independently verified
How the fuck can a man be pro-Satan and pro-Q at the same time?
He called it Q anon so maybe he’s just a grifter.
This recording is back in 2018 or so, before Q called out "QAnon"
u/#q4881
Great catch.
Came here to say the same. No such thing as QAnon.
Well to be fair Q was referred to as QANON by OG researchers and newbies for a long time until Q said otherwise. Later still Q finally told people to stop referring to even Q specifically and to just talk about the issues Q raised specifically to keep the masses from outright rejecting anons’ findings due to the media narratives against “QANON.” But there’s no question even the most ardent Q researchers referred to Q as QANON for quite some time. If this recording is old, it may have still been prior to Q saying “there is no QANON. There is Q and the anon researchers” or however Q phrased it.
This is a fact. It's very clear. The term "qanon" as created by the Q movement, but then was hijacked when it became clear that there was infiltration and corruption (aka ":anons" who developed ideas and theories that were NOT from Q but became associated with Q due to disinformation. E.g JFK jr theories, Steinbart, etc.)
So, this is the time line:
a) Q begins dropping, in a manner similar to previously existing 'anons' like FBIanon, Hollywoodanon, etc.
b) Following grows and develops, with the expression "qanon" being widely used to network, connect, and introduce "Q" to wider sphere
c) various characters, ie "anons" began developing ideas, theories, and assertions that were not sourced from Q
d) as the Q movement grew, the media began exploiting these fringe non-Q sourced tangents and streams, directly associating them with Q in order to discredit Q and the movement in general. This was the emergence of the Media creation "Qanon"
e) just prior to the conclusion of the posting phase, after 3 years of dropping, Q draws a clear line between Q and anons, in order to counteract c) and d)
f) addendum: late comers begin to think that any mention of "Qanon" is the corrupt media version, unaware of the legit history of the term, now hijacked and defunct because Q said so.
Yeah ngl, I was one of the ones who referred to Q as Qanon way back in the day.
[Also, not saying I do/ don't believe this dude. Just answering your question]
"if Jesus can save, a peed on can change"
I'm guessing this was a typo, but I honestly don't know what you're trying to say, here.
Thank you for flagging! My phone aggressively auto corrects to nonsense and I didn't catch it. Thank you, again.
I was responding to the question that someone asked [shortened and paraphrased]:
The person being interviewed in the video .. "...co-authoring of the satanist work is easily independently verified
How the fuck can a man be pro-Satan and pro-Q at the same time?"
So I was saying it is *possible for someone to decades ago be involed in darkness and make their way out (and be pro Q, for example)
Highly relevant, thanks for sharing.