Yes this is true. From the Declaration of Independance:
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator (except if someone has political tattoos showing on their body) with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness
Sec. 61.003. ELECTIONEERING AND LOITERING NEAR POLLING PLACE.
(a) A person commits an offense if, during the voting period and within 100 feet of an outside door through which a voter may enter the building in which a polling place is located, the person:
(1) loiters; or
(2) electioneers for or against any candidate, measure, or political party.
(a-1) The entity that owns or controls a public building being used as a polling place may not, at any time during the voting period, prohibit electioneering on the building's premises outside of the area described in Subsection (a), but may enact reasonable regulations concerning the time, place, and manner of electioneering.
(b) In this section:
(1) "Electioneering" includes the posting, use, or distribution of political signs or literature. The term does not include the distribution of a notice of a party convention authorized under Section 172.1114.
So what they'd be stopping her for is having a "sign" on her body. I suspect a court would ultimately permit someone to be tatted up and vote, and in the worst case make them cover it up.
Bottom line: if you have political tattoos, I'd advise putting a covering over them in the same manner some athletes have to do in certain leagues. Unless you want to make an example and initiate a Supreme Court case.
Supreme court strongly ruled that MAGA hats are federally protected in 2018 midterms because "TRUMP WAS NOT RUNNING" and electioneering is NOT mere voting.
I printed out the 34 page scotus rule and AT POLLING SITE battled State Police, and on voice phone the State AG and main Election head for 40 minutes! I made them look up the VERY CLEAR and PRECISE SCOTUS ruling on 2018 MAGA Hats. They agreed I was right!!! They told the state cops to stand down.
I proudly wore my MAGA HAT non stop while voting, and took my sweet time leaving, smiling and laughing.
I fought the Democrat regime and won.
MINNESOTA VOTERS ALLIANCE et al v. MANSKY et al, No. 16–1435. Argued February 28, 2018 — Decided June 14, 2018
In its opinion, the court said that MAGA hats and "#MeToo" pins should be allowed to be visible on voters in polling places across the USA.
10 states have old UNCONSTITUTIONAL restrictions on voters "non-issue" politically tinged apparel, soon to be unenforced or dropped I assume (for MAGA hats) :
The rest have general laws not specifically attempting to cover MAGA hats at a poll location.
Now that there is a fresh SCOTUS ruling, anyone arrested or banned from voting can sue for MILLIONS of DOLLARS for having a CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATION upon their free speech and/or right to vote.
Telling the sheriff : "The Supreme Court Ruling MINNESOTA VOTERS ALLIANCE v. MANSKY June 2018 Guarantees my Civil Right to wear my MAGA hat while voting! You are violating my Rights! I demand to speak to your supervisor!:
And hope they still arrest you... then KA-CHING!!!! PAYDAY!!!! At least a million dollars I suspect. And it will not cost you a cent to sue for the money (civil rights apportionment rules apply).
It might take up to 5 years to collect but the payday will be huge, I guarantee it. Way better odds than winning the lottery.
Have a voice recorder running in your pocket (Video is ILLEGAL AS HELL in polling place). The audio will guarantee your huge payday. , especially if you cite the SCOTUS ruling and the magic phrase "my civil rights".
You won't be allowed to loiter in any way AFTER VOTING or it slightly might cross into "electioneering" insinuations. But being barred from voting is a mammoth payday. If the election is close and you are arrested it becomes national news.
Buy and Wear a red MAGA HAT while voting (If election not for Trump)!!
Wear your MAGA Hat, in elections lacking Trump on the ballot. Print out the SCOTUS ruling above and keep it on you, and support American Freedom!
= = = =
MAGA is legal.
TL/DR: You are wrong, I gave link to a full recent 2018 SCOTUS ruling on MAGA hats... but ONLY for elections when Trump is not running on printed ballot. In 2024 many states would block you but in 2026 and later Fed law demands MAGA Hats permitted
It depends on your state voting laws. I know here in oklahoma you can't wear political clothing or display any signs closer than 750 feet or around that distance,from the polls.
It wasn't a personal question either. Just wondering what might be the spirit behind such a rule.
Obvious one is not to influence the voters. But the voters are influenced and gaslighted every minute outside of the polling station, especially by democrats. Feels like such rules are written by the democrats - "we worked so hard to program the sheeple. Don't ruin it at the last minute"!
Polls used to be rowdy with a lot of free beer and such. They had gangs to intimidate people voting for the other party,right at the polling place. Certain people had trouble voting in the south......
I see. I've never been to polling booths personally, in my life! Never was interested in politics. I got forced into getting involved after the scamdemic came out. That smelled completely fishy and led me to a rabbit hole which blew my mind about the illusory bubble that we were brainwashed to live in.
But still... intimidation and bullying is one thing since that equates to forcing an opinion on another without consent, but silently wearing political signs is another thing which is basic principles of 1st amendment. Controllers always take it to the extremes, don't they?
I would feel uncomfortable for sure, just as I feel watching the clown world news gas lighting and government continuously lying and destroying the country. But that would not change my vote since nobody can see whom I am voting for. We can't prohibit them doing their clownery, they shouldn't suppress our right to express.
Using the same logic of "laws applying to everyone", they muzzled us, masked us and shot deadly toxic cocktail up in our veins (not me, of course) in the name of "protecting everyone from deadly virus". Same way, they confiscated our guns in the name of "guns lead to violence". None of these including the one in context above is in the best interest of the citizens. Its always towards protecting them and their narratives.
If one can be easily influenced merely by someone holding a specific political sign or flag, they shouldn't be allowed to vote, IMHO. Such vote should be made illegal, honestly - since it is not based on informed consent. Random votes are useless and can create a huge havoc in our systems. Only qualified voters should be allowed to vote after taking an exam to qualify. Mere voter Id and citizenship are not sufficient if their minds are so weak and they are too lazy to do at least some basic investigations on the candidates they are voting for.
Louisiana has similar laws regarding "politic free" zone around voting places. I agree with it. Everyone should feel comfortable at their own voting precinct. There really is no reason to push any political agenda in the immediate vicinity of the election centers.
What about states that say it’s racist to show an ID to vote, doesn’t that disenfranchise literally everyone in every state that votes? Cheating in one place ruins the entire process. Plus, rocking your nations colors or wearing anything with an American flag pretty much indicates a Trump supporter at this point in 1984. It’s wild to me how nonchalantly the system acts when exposed.
Yes this is true. From the Declaration of Independance:
Is that the clown version of the declaration? Haven't seen that one. Kek!
Its the version they send it to the judges for free.
Kek!
Most states have a "no electioneering" provision. For example:
https://statutes.capitol.texas.gov/Docs/EL/htm/EL.61.htm
So what they'd be stopping her for is having a "sign" on her body. I suspect a court would ultimately permit someone to be tatted up and vote, and in the worst case make them cover it up.
Bottom line: if you have political tattoos, I'd advise putting a covering over them in the same manner some athletes have to do in certain leagues. Unless you want to make an example and initiate a Supreme Court case.
IMO the court has better things to consider...
SUPREME COURT RULED YOUR FACTS WRONG!!!
Supreme court strongly ruled that MAGA hats are federally protected in 2018 midterms because "TRUMP WAS NOT RUNNING" and electioneering is NOT mere voting.
I printed out the 34 page scotus rule and AT POLLING SITE battled State Police, and on voice phone the State AG and main Election head for 40 minutes! I made them look up the VERY CLEAR and PRECISE SCOTUS ruling on 2018 MAGA Hats. They agreed I was right!!! They told the state cops to stand down.
I proudly wore my MAGA HAT non stop while voting, and took my sweet time leaving, smiling and laughing.
I fought the Democrat regime and won.
MINNESOTA VOTERS ALLIANCE et al v. MANSKY et al, No. 16–1435. Argued February 28, 2018 — Decided June 14, 2018
In its opinion, the court said that MAGA hats and "#MeToo" pins should be allowed to be visible on voters in polling places across the USA.
10 states have old UNCONSTITUTIONAL restrictions on voters "non-issue" politically tinged apparel, soon to be unenforced or dropped I assume (for MAGA hats) :
The rest have general laws not specifically attempting to cover MAGA hats at a poll location.
Now that there is a fresh SCOTUS ruling, anyone arrested or banned from voting can sue for MILLIONS of DOLLARS for having a CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATION upon their free speech and/or right to vote.
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-06-14/supreme-court-strikes-down-law-banning-maga-hats-polling-places
PRINT OUT the 34 page US supreme court ruling and fold it up in your pocket, so that you can get MAXIMUM DAMAGES AWARD for Civil Rights Violation !
The recent SCOTUS Ruling ! :
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/17pdf/16-1435_2co3.pdf
Telling the sheriff : "The Supreme Court Ruling MINNESOTA VOTERS ALLIANCE v. MANSKY June 2018 Guarantees my Civil Right to wear my MAGA hat while voting! You are violating my Rights! I demand to speak to your supervisor!:
And hope they still arrest you... then KA-CHING!!!! PAYDAY!!!! At least a million dollars I suspect. And it will not cost you a cent to sue for the money (civil rights apportionment rules apply).
It might take up to 5 years to collect but the payday will be huge, I guarantee it. Way better odds than winning the lottery.
Have a voice recorder running in your pocket (Video is ILLEGAL AS HELL in polling place). The audio will guarantee your huge payday. , especially if you cite the SCOTUS ruling and the magic phrase "my civil rights".
You won't be allowed to loiter in any way AFTER VOTING or it slightly might cross into "electioneering" insinuations. But being barred from voting is a mammoth payday. If the election is close and you are arrested it becomes national news.
Buy and Wear a red MAGA HAT while voting (If election not for Trump)!!
Wear your MAGA Hat, in elections lacking Trump on the ballot. Print out the SCOTUS ruling above and keep it on you, and support American Freedom!
= = = =
MAGA is legal.
TL/DR: You are wrong, I gave link to a full recent 2018 SCOTUS ruling on MAGA hats... but ONLY for elections when Trump is not running on printed ballot. In 2024 many states would block you but in 2026 and later Fed law demands MAGA Hats permitted
Well stated and argued fren.
That's awesome, you rock patriot! 🇺🇲🎉
It depends on your state voting laws. I know here in oklahoma you can't wear political clothing or display any signs closer than 750 feet or around that distance,from the polls.
So... the 1st amendment is blocked within polling station perimeters? On what basis is this rule written?
It's not my rule. I just know from putting up thousands of signs that states have rules.
By all means hire a good attorney and sue them.
It wasn't a personal question either. Just wondering what might be the spirit behind such a rule.
Obvious one is not to influence the voters. But the voters are influenced and gaslighted every minute outside of the polling station, especially by democrats. Feels like such rules are written by the democrats - "we worked so hard to program the sheeple. Don't ruin it at the last minute"!
Polls used to be rowdy with a lot of free beer and such. They had gangs to intimidate people voting for the other party,right at the polling place. Certain people had trouble voting in the south......
Laws were passed to clean things up.
I see. I've never been to polling booths personally, in my life! Never was interested in politics. I got forced into getting involved after the scamdemic came out. That smelled completely fishy and led me to a rabbit hole which blew my mind about the illusory bubble that we were brainwashed to live in.
But still... intimidation and bullying is one thing since that equates to forcing an opinion on another without consent, but silently wearing political signs is another thing which is basic principles of 1st amendment. Controllers always take it to the extremes, don't they?
How would you like to vote were everyone has kamala shirt and signs on that work their or work in that building,and hanging around?
Laws need to be simple and apply to everyone,to work as intended,....
I would feel uncomfortable for sure, just as I feel watching the clown world news gas lighting and government continuously lying and destroying the country. But that would not change my vote since nobody can see whom I am voting for. We can't prohibit them doing their clownery, they shouldn't suppress our right to express.
Using the same logic of "laws applying to everyone", they muzzled us, masked us and shot deadly toxic cocktail up in our veins (not me, of course) in the name of "protecting everyone from deadly virus". Same way, they confiscated our guns in the name of "guns lead to violence". None of these including the one in context above is in the best interest of the citizens. Its always towards protecting them and their narratives.
If one can be easily influenced merely by someone holding a specific political sign or flag, they shouldn't be allowed to vote, IMHO. Such vote should be made illegal, honestly - since it is not based on informed consent. Random votes are useless and can create a huge havoc in our systems. Only qualified voters should be allowed to vote after taking an exam to qualify. Mere voter Id and citizenship are not sufficient if their minds are so weak and they are too lazy to do at least some basic investigations on the candidates they are voting for.
We have a similar law in Missouri but not that distance. I think it's probably 50 or 75 ft.
I used to drive around putting up signs near the polling places all the time. Sometimes they would call party headquarters and make us move them....
Louisiana has similar laws regarding "politic free" zone around voting places. I agree with it. Everyone should feel comfortable at their own voting precinct. There really is no reason to push any political agenda in the immediate vicinity of the election centers.
twstalker - https://twstalker.com/ForgiatoBlow47/status/1846930834030235902
GP: Model With “MAGA” Face Tattoo Told She Couldn’t Vote With Tattoo Exposed (VIDEO)
What about states that say it’s racist to show an ID to vote, doesn’t that disenfranchise literally everyone in every state that votes? Cheating in one place ruins the entire process. Plus, rocking your nations colors or wearing anything with an American flag pretty much indicates a Trump supporter at this point in 1984. It’s wild to me how nonchalantly the system acts when exposed.
That is not true only poll watchers and workers cannot wear campaign material. Awful.