Just to let you know from a programming standpoint, you can program the vector of a touch screen to do whatever you want. It doesn't matter at all what's being displayed on the screen! You think you just "pressed" (news flash, you're not pressing ANYTHING! You're touching a vector point or the screen that will kick off a routine in the background to do whatever you program it to do.) is not programmed to send your vote to Trump like you think! On screen, it looks like you did, but in reality you just voted for Harris. Why do you think in 2020 the votes went for Biden but strangely the person "voting" didn't down ballot vote for every other DEM? They voted for Biden for president, but oddly they voted for Republican candidates down ballot?! Was that a clue there was something really wrong?
First point. Kentucky has a veto proof State Legislature. There is no way they are going to elect Harris.
Second point.
There is an old saying that goes something like:
“Quite often the man who says it can’t be done encounters someone already doing it.”
And, I think that every time people make excuses about why hand counting paper ballots is supposedly a bad idea. I remember watching the French Presidential election and reading this in an AP story:
“French voters in Sunday’s presidential election will use the same system that’s been used for generations: paper ballots that are cast in person and counted by hand. Despite periodic calls for more flexibility or modernization, France doesn’t do mail-in voting, early voting or use voting machines en masse like the United States.”
France is a country with 49 million registered voters. My understanding is three different people count each batch of ballots. They have their results in a matter of hours.
I'm def no fan of machines, but this just looks like user error to me. First of all you don't need to press that tiny little check box, that's a visual thing to show what you have selected. You just click in the middle of the entire box that says Trump. It seems to be someone not very familiar with touch screens or how those UIs works, like how old people double click everything on websites when you don't need to do that.
If this was some kind of scheme you'd do it in a much less obvious way. But I still think we should be going to paper ballots, hand counting, with machine count verification.
Just to let you know from a programming standpoint, you can program the vector of a touch screen to do whatever you want. It doesn't matter at all what's being displayed on the screen! You think you just "pressed" (news flash, you're not pressing ANYTHING! You're touching a vector point or the screen that will kick off a routine in the background to do whatever you program it to do.) is not programmed to send your vote to Trump like you think! On screen, it looks like you did, but in reality you just voted for Harris. Why do you think in 2020 the votes went for Biden but strangely the person "voting" didn't down ballot vote for every other DEM? They voted for Biden for president, but oddly they voted for Republican candidates down ballot?! Was that a clue there was something really wrong?
I worked with a group to get rid of them in Florida.
Good for you
Your state completely wiped out the Dems in 2022
I would be recording the whole interaction with any of these touchscreens.
First point. Kentucky has a veto proof State Legislature. There is no way they are going to elect Harris.
Second point.
There is an old saying that goes something like:
“Quite often the man who says it can’t be done encounters someone already doing it.”
And, I think that every time people make excuses about why hand counting paper ballots is supposedly a bad idea. I remember watching the French Presidential election and reading this in an AP story:
“French voters in Sunday’s presidential election will use the same system that’s been used for generations: paper ballots that are cast in person and counted by hand. Despite periodic calls for more flexibility or modernization, France doesn’t do mail-in voting, early voting or use voting machines en masse like the United States.”
France is a country with 49 million registered voters. My understanding is three different people count each batch of ballots. They have their results in a matter of hours.
The machines really need to go.
They're supposed to give you a stylus aren't they?
I would think so. Those touch screens do not like my fingers.
But it's so easy...
not really
I'm def no fan of machines, but this just looks like user error to me. First of all you don't need to press that tiny little check box, that's a visual thing to show what you have selected. You just click in the middle of the entire box that says Trump. It seems to be someone not very familiar with touch screens or how those UIs works, like how old people double click everything on websites when you don't need to do that. If this was some kind of scheme you'd do it in a much less obvious way. But I still think we should be going to paper ballots, hand counting, with machine count verification.