OK. This Q Drop is crazy.
(qalerts.app)
Comments (10)
sorted by:
Jesus
Wow🤯!
Nice.👏
That's... Pretty wild.
So question… the 53-47 was that ever established as anything else fully? Like what was the general consensus because I recall that coming up as a proof with maybe a primary or previous election?
Trying to explain my question…. What was the general consensus of 53-47 before this? Did Q hit the nail on that before or missed or it connected elsewhere where did we leave off? Is this like another hit for this number prediction or the first “true” hit?
Any response appreciated just trying to recall and understand how big of a proof this is and what we had previously left off with this number.
This post certainly makes it even more interesting, when Q asks if a women is nominated WAS there a women position nominated at the time of post or someone Q was referring to or who was an option?
The Senate at the time of this post was 53-45 with 2 Independents caucusing with Democrats, so effectively 53-47.
I don’t who or what Q would have been referencing about the smearing or name removal. I hope someone has the answer.
Thank you. And so now if we secure the senate it will be 53-47? Still with 2 indep?
Da Yum. This may be the most overlooked drop.
u/#q2671
To think tons of emotional children on other wins are still saying "The Great Cucking has begun" regarding Gaetz's withdrawal.