Some notes on pardons reported in X22 Report on Dec 5, 2024
Limitations:
The presidential pardon only applies to federal offenses. State crimes are beyond the President’s pardon power.
As explicitly stated in the Constitution, the President’s pardon power does not extend to cases of impeachment.
If a president who won an election through proven fraudulent means were to pardon individuals involved in the election fraud, several complex legal and political scenarios could unfold:
Legal Validity of Pardons:
If the president’s election is later invalidated due to fraud, there’s a significant question regarding the legal standing of any actions taken, including pardons. The doctrine that “fraud vitiates all” might apply, suggesting that acts stemming from a fraudulent basis could be considered void. However, this would likely be a matter for judicial interpretation.
The Constitution does not explicitly address the scenario where a president, elected under fraudulent conditions, uses the pardon power. The Supreme Court might need to rule on whether such pardons are valid, especially if the presidency itself is deemed illegitimate.
, if a president were proven to have cheated in an election to win, any pardons issued might face legal challenges, potentially being deemed void or invalid.
Why would they need pardons? /s
Exactly!
The Trump card is this: Biden is illegitimate. His entire Presidency will become null and void, including these pardons. Perhaps Obama, too.
'By the time we're finished with Obama, he'll claim Kenyan citizenship...' Q
Some notes on pardons reported in X22 Report on Dec 5, 2024
Limitations: The presidential pardon only applies to federal offenses. State crimes are beyond the President’s pardon power. As explicitly stated in the Constitution, the President’s pardon power does not extend to cases of impeachment. If a president who won an election through proven fraudulent means were to pardon individuals involved in the election fraud, several complex legal and political scenarios could unfold: Legal Validity of Pardons: If the president’s election is later invalidated due to fraud, there’s a significant question regarding the legal standing of any actions taken, including pardons. The doctrine that “fraud vitiates all” might apply, suggesting that acts stemming from a fraudulent basis could be considered void. However, this would likely be a matter for judicial interpretation. The Constitution does not explicitly address the scenario where a president, elected under fraudulent conditions, uses the pardon power. The Supreme Court might need to rule on whether such pardons are valid, especially if the presidency itself is deemed illegitimate. , if a president were proven to have cheated in an election to win, any pardons issued might face legal challenges, potentially being deemed void or invalid.
KEK!
I feel this is the plan.
I think some of these folks they are contemplating a pardon for are likely already under a sealed indictment, possibly for treason.
I wonder if that can throw a monkey wrench into a pardon?
Nuremberg trials are not protected by pardon!
Do it, loser. Make my day, Robinette.
Show the whole world how much of a fucktard you really are.
Thought pardon were only for crimes committed, and not for hypotheticals. Is this an admission?
How do you pardon someone that hasn't been alleged of committing a crime, indicted for said crime, convicted and / or sentenced?
Yep, I posted it 2 days ago.
I wasnt aware that aides had the power for pardons.
How has Miss Piggy not been booted from the Republican Party?
Just goes to show how pathetic the RNC really is.