And hopefully common sense is being resurrected in our nation! Only the most liberal of liberals deny the damage done by allowing this crap to happen (and is still ongoing).
Looks legit - this from the kten article: “Section 1155 is a quintessential grant of discretion,” Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, a President Joe Biden appointee, wrote in the decision. “The Secretary ‘may’ revoke a previously approved visa petition ‘at any time’ for what the Secretary deems ‘good and sufficient cause.’ Congress did not impose specific criteria or conditions limiting this authority, nor did it prescribe how or when the Secretary must act.”
So basically the secretary has the right to revoke previously approved visas (especially if he decides theres som shenanegans going on) and can then do what he wants. But the court affirmed that pretty much the secretary of immigration has a lot of leeway on how and when he enforces immigration visa laws.
That is pretty amazing, because it seems like one of the leftist judges could fairly easily judge that "it violates basic human rights to force someone to leave a place where they live", since they make even more ridiculous arguments for other cases.
And hopefully common sense is being resurrected in our nation! Only the most liberal of liberals deny the damage done by allowing this crap to happen (and is still ongoing).
Foreigners crossing our border and breaking immigration laws; and then have Justices following Constitutional law, what are they thinking?
Nah, it just means that all 9 of them must be racist, of course.
PLEASE tell me this is real & NOT a shitpost..... Can you please post a link, OP?
https://www.kten.com/news/supreme-court-unanimous-ruling-may-pave-way-for-mass-deportation/article_e1591291-2ebf-5ac1-b7b6-8bfcd04ce8c5.html
I'm not finding any sauce on this, not even here.
Looks legit - this from the kten article: “Section 1155 is a quintessential grant of discretion,” Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, a President Joe Biden appointee, wrote in the decision. “The Secretary ‘may’ revoke a previously approved visa petition ‘at any time’ for what the Secretary deems ‘good and sufficient cause.’ Congress did not impose specific criteria or conditions limiting this authority, nor did it prescribe how or when the Secretary must act.”
So basically the secretary has the right to revoke previously approved visas (especially if he decides theres som shenanegans going on) and can then do what he wants. But the court affirmed that pretty much the secretary of immigration has a lot of leeway on how and when he enforces immigration visa laws.
What? They agree on that, but not on Brunson? I think not. Whatever their reasons for not disclosing that decision, it's already done imo.
Here you go:
https://www.kten.com/news/supreme-court-unanimous-ruling-may-pave-way-for-mass-deportation/article_e1591291-2ebf-5ac1-b7b6-8bfcd04ce8c5.html
That's a hell of a hurdle jump, some really good anti-black pill doom news.
That is pretty amazing, because it seems like one of the leftist judges could fairly easily judge that "it violates basic human rights to force someone to leave a place where they live", since they make even more ridiculous arguments for other cases.
WINNING!
So does this stop challenges from woke Hawaiian judges?
Well it should be the end for a legal challenge.
This is SHOCKING to say the least!
Original YouTube short here that referenced SC Opinion Bouarfa v. Mayorkas pdf that was on 12/10/2024
Like I said...a bit thin and a stretch.
Next time sauce or GTFO
💥 BOOM 💥
The left feels this will trigger the rebellion? Just looking for a motive as they rarely do justice.
Adios Mateo, Sebastian, Santiago, Leonardo, and Matias.