The video events are too diverse and moving too fast to keep up with the narration. We are left to accept what the narrator is saying happens.
There is emphasis on the "plastic" windows, which are irrelevant to events. The shatter pattern is typical of safety glass, which is two panes of glass sandwiched with a plastic middle layer. The purpose is to retain any fragments of shattered glass, so there are no stray pieces or shards. It also means that the pane is removable as a single piece. This has long been the standard for automobile windshields and windows. The crowd had been working for some time previous to account for the windows' shattered condition.
The narrator is amazed that a nose bleed can happen suddenly. That is how all my nose bleeds begin---suddenly. Being shot in the neck can easily result in perforation through the main arteries and esophagus, resulting in blood pooling in the mouth or the sinuses since she was in a supine position.
Babbit being semi-motionless or expressionless during shock is entirely expectable.
The utter confusion of the police suggests they were unprepared and untrained for this kind of emergency. Missteps are common in the midst of confusion. I had the overwhelming impression that this was not professional-grade performance. In a real event of this kind, the response should have been to take control of he scene, get everyone's attention, clear the immediate area, and the stairwell, and not be gentle about it, as every second would be life draining away. I have a hard time understanding how police could be injected into a crowd and have no loud-hailing capability. Shouting never cuts through jabber.
As for fake blood implements or coordinated hand gestures, those are all the interpretations of the narrator, coaxing you to see what he wants you to see. A Rorschach blot reading is not "evidence" or "proof."
People get too wrapped up in a false dichotomy: "It was all real" or "It was all fake." What looks more plausible to me is that it was a scripted event that went off-script. I am beginning to suspect that officer Byrd was supposed to shoot over Babbitt's head, but had poor aim. There is nothing in the record of events to suggest that Byrd was a marksman. The confusion and hesitation following would be consistent with the swordfight of the play going fatal, yet the play had to go on. Their delay and hesitation probably cost Babbitt her life. If this was how the scenario played out, the complexities of liability for Byrd and the play directors become more apparent. They would all be complicit in negligent or attempted homicide, and obstruction of justice. I'm not very surprised that Byrd is asking for more money. This is probably far more than he signed up for. And the Metropolitan Police have much to obfuscate and conceal.
Not only that, but I'm always skeptical about theories about the deep state faking deaths (Ashli Babbitt, Sandy Hook, etc). These are psychopaths, and it's easier and cheaper for them to actually kill people than to fake their deaths and put them in hiding.
I've looked at hours of evidence to suggest it is a hoax, but the only video I needed to see was that of Robbie Parker laughing at the podium the day of or after his daughter was KILLED in cold blood. The moment he is told the camera is rolling he conjures up this fake sadness and his voice completely changes. It's some of the worst acting I've ever witnessed. No parent could be laughing like that after their child was murdered... and then no parent would have to fake being sad / heartbroken after such a tragedy.
I was just about to say this same thing. That one video. You lose a child, you will not find a shred of joy for days, if not weeks. Not even if a clown slips on a banana peel while cracking a loud fart are you going to at the very least, exhale sharply through your nostrils.
You can reuse assets. Why would you kill one of your agents when you dont have to.? She doesnt even have to hide, a haircut and makeup and 99.999 percent of the public wouldnt even know her if they passed her on the street, especially since they assume she is dead.
There is a big difference between killing innocent people ala 9/11 vs killing people that you control.
No examples of this. It is an imaginary scenario. 99.999% of the public wouldn't recognize her as anyone if they passed her on the street, even if they didn't know she was dead. Who knew her anyway? A family of maybe 10 members? In a population of 350 million, that would mean 99.99999714% of the public wouldn't recognize her if she were alive. Dye her hair. Add a mustache. Do you begin to see that the trouble to obtain an unrecognizable "asset" is not worth even a penny?
This might be one of you most asinine replies ever.
I think you get a kick out of seeing how many people you can gaslight with your nonsensical ramblings.
It costs time and money to train assets/ operatives Why would you kill them if you dont have to.?
You even claim that it was a skit turned tradgedy, so in that scenario they didnt intend to kill her at all. Seems YOUR own theory bolsters the idea that they didnt want her to die.....
This comment should be higher up. I agree completely, the narrator is inserting his own narrative and coaching the viewer too much on how to interpret a series of chaotic events. I'm not sure I would come away with "it was staged" if I was just watching the raw footage. I'm not saying it isn't staged, perhaps more definitive evidence will come to light, but this video isn't really proof of anything in my view.
Ill upvote you cause thats cool, but you should know then that dude obviously wasnt firing .22, he really didnt fire in her direction but more at the wall, no exit wound on the neck, no 4 ft gallon blood spray, no splattering, no death screams, no slackjaw limpness... cmon ur better than thisss
Those manifestations are great for cinema, but what have they to do with real life? Watch "The First 48" (A&E network) for a while to see how shootings play out.
How do you explain the horrible actors at the end trying to stir up drama? This is ABSOLUTELY HORRIBLE ACTING. This is not how any real person would be acting, and there are multiple horrible actors.
These are undoubtedly paid agitators and they are agitating. Most of them are oblivious to the crisis and are getting screen time, or playing for each other. The whole J6 scenario was street theater.
The video events are too diverse and moving too fast to keep up with the narration. We are left to accept what the narrator is saying happens.
There is emphasis on the "plastic" windows, which are irrelevant to events. The shatter pattern is typical of safety glass, which is two panes of glass sandwiched with a plastic middle layer. The purpose is to retain any fragments of shattered glass, so there are no stray pieces or shards. It also means that the pane is removable as a single piece. This has long been the standard for automobile windshields and windows. The crowd had been working for some time previous to account for the windows' shattered condition.
The narrator is amazed that a nose bleed can happen suddenly. That is how all my nose bleeds begin---suddenly. Being shot in the neck can easily result in perforation through the main arteries and esophagus, resulting in blood pooling in the mouth or the sinuses since she was in a supine position.
Babbit being semi-motionless or expressionless during shock is entirely expectable.
The utter confusion of the police suggests they were unprepared and untrained for this kind of emergency. Missteps are common in the midst of confusion. I had the overwhelming impression that this was not professional-grade performance. In a real event of this kind, the response should have been to take control of he scene, get everyone's attention, clear the immediate area, and the stairwell, and not be gentle about it, as every second would be life draining away. I have a hard time understanding how police could be injected into a crowd and have no loud-hailing capability. Shouting never cuts through jabber.
As for fake blood implements or coordinated hand gestures, those are all the interpretations of the narrator, coaxing you to see what he wants you to see. A Rorschach blot reading is not "evidence" or "proof."
People get too wrapped up in a false dichotomy: "It was all real" or "It was all fake." What looks more plausible to me is that it was a scripted event that went off-script. I am beginning to suspect that officer Byrd was supposed to shoot over Babbitt's head, but had poor aim. There is nothing in the record of events to suggest that Byrd was a marksman. The confusion and hesitation following would be consistent with the swordfight of the play going fatal, yet the play had to go on. Their delay and hesitation probably cost Babbitt her life. If this was how the scenario played out, the complexities of liability for Byrd and the play directors become more apparent. They would all be complicit in negligent or attempted homicide, and obstruction of justice. I'm not very surprised that Byrd is asking for more money. This is probably far more than he signed up for. And the Metropolitan Police have much to obfuscate and conceal.
Not only that, but I'm always skeptical about theories about the deep state faking deaths (Ashli Babbitt, Sandy Hook, etc). These are psychopaths, and it's easier and cheaper for them to actually kill people than to fake their deaths and put them in hiding.
If you're skeptical about Sandy Hoax, you are either a shill or you have looked at nothing. That one, especially, screamed total hoax.
I've looked at hours of evidence to suggest it is a hoax, but the only video I needed to see was that of Robbie Parker laughing at the podium the day of or after his daughter was KILLED in cold blood. The moment he is told the camera is rolling he conjures up this fake sadness and his voice completely changes. It's some of the worst acting I've ever witnessed. No parent could be laughing like that after their child was murdered... and then no parent would have to fake being sad / heartbroken after such a tragedy.
I was just about to say this same thing. That one video. You lose a child, you will not find a shred of joy for days, if not weeks. Not even if a clown slips on a banana peel while cracking a loud fart are you going to at the very least, exhale sharply through your nostrils.
You can reuse assets. Why would you kill one of your agents when you dont have to.? She doesnt even have to hide, a haircut and makeup and 99.999 percent of the public wouldnt even know her if they passed her on the street, especially since they assume she is dead.
There is a big difference between killing innocent people ala 9/11 vs killing people that you control.
No examples of this. It is an imaginary scenario. 99.999% of the public wouldn't recognize her as anyone if they passed her on the street, even if they didn't know she was dead. Who knew her anyway? A family of maybe 10 members? In a population of 350 million, that would mean 99.99999714% of the public wouldn't recognize her if she were alive. Dye her hair. Add a mustache. Do you begin to see that the trouble to obtain an unrecognizable "asset" is not worth even a penny?
LOL...keep shillling shill.
This might be one of you most asinine replies ever.
I think you get a kick out of seeing how many people you can gaslight with your nonsensical ramblings.
It costs time and money to train assets/ operatives Why would you kill them if you dont have to.?
You even claim that it was a skit turned tradgedy, so in that scenario they didnt intend to kill her at all. Seems YOUR own theory bolsters the idea that they didnt want her to die.....
Regarding Sandy Hook, It's actually easier to get actors to sign an NDA a participate in a large scale hoax if you don't kill people.
This comment should be higher up. I agree completely, the narrator is inserting his own narrative and coaching the viewer too much on how to interpret a series of chaotic events. I'm not sure I would come away with "it was staged" if I was just watching the raw footage. I'm not saying it isn't staged, perhaps more definitive evidence will come to light, but this video isn't really proof of anything in my view.
True that the narrator is inserting his opinion.
True that it doesnt PROVE anything.
But there is certainly a shit ton of evidence to suggest a production.
Except the "evidence" is all interpretation. No sample of fake blood. Nothing physical. No idea what was in Babbit's backpack.
Yep, and people are using their God given sense about logic and how people/things work to iinterpret that is all BS.
Blood spews all over the place when you get shot. This is all bullshit and terrible acting. Look closer.
It depends on where you are hit and what you are hit by.
Tell us you've never seen someone get shot in the neck without saying you've never seen anyone get shot in the neck
Although thorough, youre absolutely mistaken my friend.
As though you have? And they are all the same? I was a member of the International Wound Ballistics Association.
Ill upvote you cause thats cool, but you should know then that dude obviously wasnt firing .22, he really didnt fire in her direction but more at the wall, no exit wound on the neck, no 4 ft gallon blood spray, no splattering, no death screams, no slackjaw limpness... cmon ur better than thisss
Those manifestations are great for cinema, but what have they to do with real life? Watch "The First 48" (A&E network) for a while to see how shootings play out.
How do you explain the horrible actors at the end trying to stir up drama? This is ABSOLUTELY HORRIBLE ACTING. This is not how any real person would be acting, and there are multiple horrible actors.
These are undoubtedly paid agitators and they are agitating. Most of them are oblivious to the crisis and are getting screen time, or playing for each other. The whole J6 scenario was street theater.