Not only that, but I'm always skeptical about theories about the deep state faking deaths (Ashli Babbitt, Sandy Hook, etc). These are psychopaths, and it's easier and cheaper for them to actually kill people than to fake their deaths and put them in hiding.
I've looked at hours of evidence to suggest it is a hoax, but the only video I needed to see was that of Robbie Parker laughing at the podium the day of or after his daughter was KILLED in cold blood. The moment he is told the camera is rolling he conjures up this fake sadness and his voice completely changes. It's some of the worst acting I've ever witnessed. No parent could be laughing like that after their child was murdered... and then no parent would have to fake being sad / heartbroken after such a tragedy.
I was just about to say this same thing. That one video. You lose a child, you will not find a shred of joy for days, if not weeks. Not even if a clown slips on a banana peel while cracking a loud fart are you going to at the very least, exhale sharply through your nostrils.
You can reuse assets. Why would you kill one of your agents when you dont have to.? She doesnt even have to hide, a haircut and makeup and 99.999 percent of the public wouldnt even know her if they passed her on the street, especially since they assume she is dead.
There is a big difference between killing innocent people ala 9/11 vs killing people that you control.
No examples of this. It is an imaginary scenario. 99.999% of the public wouldn't recognize her as anyone if they passed her on the street, even if they didn't know she was dead. Who knew her anyway? A family of maybe 10 members? In a population of 350 million, that would mean 99.99999714% of the public wouldn't recognize her if she were alive. Dye her hair. Add a mustache. Do you begin to see that the trouble to obtain an unrecognizable "asset" is not worth even a penny?
This might be one of you most asinine replies ever.
I think you get a kick out of seeing how many people you can gaslight with your nonsensical ramblings.
It costs time and money to train assets/ operatives Why would you kill them if you dont have to.?
You even claim that it was a skit turned tradgedy, so in that scenario they didnt intend to kill her at all. Seems YOUR own theory bolsters the idea that they didnt want her to die.....
So train them off the street. No need to spend time and money to set up a Passionspiel requiring thousands of extras and an unreasonable risk of homicide. You are just making a special plea to rescue this idea from ridicule.
Neither you nor I have any idea how the play was supposed to go down, assuming there was one.
You and this video editor are doing the gaslighting. No evidence whatsoever, just an insistent interpretation of a Rorschach blot. "Look, it's a butterfly."
Not only that, but I'm always skeptical about theories about the deep state faking deaths (Ashli Babbitt, Sandy Hook, etc). These are psychopaths, and it's easier and cheaper for them to actually kill people than to fake their deaths and put them in hiding.
If you're skeptical about Sandy Hoax, you are either a shill or you have looked at nothing. That one, especially, screamed total hoax.
I've looked at hours of evidence to suggest it is a hoax, but the only video I needed to see was that of Robbie Parker laughing at the podium the day of or after his daughter was KILLED in cold blood. The moment he is told the camera is rolling he conjures up this fake sadness and his voice completely changes. It's some of the worst acting I've ever witnessed. No parent could be laughing like that after their child was murdered... and then no parent would have to fake being sad / heartbroken after such a tragedy.
I was just about to say this same thing. That one video. You lose a child, you will not find a shred of joy for days, if not weeks. Not even if a clown slips on a banana peel while cracking a loud fart are you going to at the very least, exhale sharply through your nostrils.
You can reuse assets. Why would you kill one of your agents when you dont have to.? She doesnt even have to hide, a haircut and makeup and 99.999 percent of the public wouldnt even know her if they passed her on the street, especially since they assume she is dead.
There is a big difference between killing innocent people ala 9/11 vs killing people that you control.
No examples of this. It is an imaginary scenario. 99.999% of the public wouldn't recognize her as anyone if they passed her on the street, even if they didn't know she was dead. Who knew her anyway? A family of maybe 10 members? In a population of 350 million, that would mean 99.99999714% of the public wouldn't recognize her if she were alive. Dye her hair. Add a mustache. Do you begin to see that the trouble to obtain an unrecognizable "asset" is not worth even a penny?
LOL...keep shillling shill.
This might be one of you most asinine replies ever.
I think you get a kick out of seeing how many people you can gaslight with your nonsensical ramblings.
It costs time and money to train assets/ operatives Why would you kill them if you dont have to.?
You even claim that it was a skit turned tradgedy, so in that scenario they didnt intend to kill her at all. Seems YOUR own theory bolsters the idea that they didnt want her to die.....
So train them off the street. No need to spend time and money to set up a Passionspiel requiring thousands of extras and an unreasonable risk of homicide. You are just making a special plea to rescue this idea from ridicule.
Neither you nor I have any idea how the play was supposed to go down, assuming there was one.
You and this video editor are doing the gaslighting. No evidence whatsoever, just an insistent interpretation of a Rorschach blot. "Look, it's a butterfly."
Regarding Sandy Hook, It's actually easier to get actors to sign an NDA a participate in a large scale hoax if you don't kill people.