WWG1WGA! It is amazing to me how many on this board go directly to the enemy is winning mentality. White Hats are in control! For years now I have read comments on how we need to burn hollywood/la, wipe it out, erase it off the map, we don't need it, and when it happens everyone says, they are burning the evidence! We have it all! Best comment given! Thank you.
Exactly what I've been saying. If they'll kill 200 people on an airplane to assassinate one person, they'll burn down half of LA as a cover story to demolish tunnels.
They’ll sink an “unsinkable” Cruise liner filled with wealthy aristocrats just to kill a handful of men that were going to vote against the creation of a central bank.
The fire is the cover story because there is always a cover story. During the cleanup after the fire, they'll talk about demolishing foundations and infrastructure to "repurpose" the land.
If they have access to the tunnels and could easily get things out. Logical but depressing thought as the rest of the people wait in lines after leaving everything behind.
They burned all the evidence in the city. I'm a "kid friendly" neighborhood too. That's where all the pedophilia goes down tbh, because that's where there is access to kids
I find the premise very credible. A lot of suspicious factoids around the situation. For example, I saw a report (unconfirmed) that the palisades water reservoir was offline and empty, reportedly for 'previously scheduled maintenance'. Well, ain't that an interesting coincidink?
burning the place down to rebuild isn’t the solution
No one has actually suggested it is. This is just 100% unfounded speculation. Wildfires occur naturally based on environmental conditions. Dry vegetation and high winds mainly.
A million acres burned last year in Texas.
And these conditions were all present in Southern California last month.
Storm activity in the fall was higher up the Pacific Coast leaving LA in drought.
One storm that hit Santa Cruz washed away the edge of the wharf. A dude surfed what might be the the biggest wave ever at Mavericks.
So LA was dry.
The Santa Ana wind events have been known about since the days of the Spanish Missions.
A strong Santa Ana wind event was on everyone's radar and was predicted the week before the fires.
And these were crazy strong winds. Reached 100 mph in some places.
Here's an early Jan report that said conditions were bad for LA.
For January, above normal significant fire potential is forecast across portions of southern California, much of central and south Texas, and from the central Florida Peninsula northward
through the Panhandle and along the Atlantic coast into eastern Virginia.
I dunno man, the way everyone is coming out about their great vision for LA 2.0 sounds a bit sus to me. They haven’t even waited for the embers to cool from their burning houses and these demons are blabbing about these projects they will be getting paid handsomely under the table for. Wake up Juan.
And yes, there is plenty of blame to spread around here. From the gov to the mayor and everyone in between
"We have it all"
Is Griffin working for the white hats? Sounds like it when he says "we're going to catch them"
After Katt Williams Griffin has been blowing up the Hollywood faggot ass faggots.
WWG1WGA! It is amazing to me how many on this board go directly to the enemy is winning mentality. White Hats are in control! For years now I have read comments on how we need to burn hollywood/la, wipe it out, erase it off the map, we don't need it, and when it happens everyone says, they are burning the evidence! We have it all! Best comment given! Thank you.
Exactly what I've been saying. If they'll kill 200 people on an airplane to assassinate one person, they'll burn down half of LA as a cover story to demolish tunnels.
They’ll sink an “unsinkable” Cruise liner filled with wealthy aristocrats just to kill a handful of men that were going to vote against the creation of a central bank.
The fire is the cover story because there is always a cover story. During the cleanup after the fire, they'll talk about demolishing foundations and infrastructure to "repurpose" the land.
He said, “Who had already left their house and knew that the fire was commin’”? That is a great question!
I wonder if someone warned celebrities to get their pricey collectibles out of their homes before the fire.
If they have access to the tunnels and could easily get things out. Logical but depressing thought as the rest of the people wait in lines after leaving everything behind.
They burned all the evidence in the city. I'm a "kid friendly" neighborhood too. That's where all the pedophilia goes down tbh, because that's where there is access to kids
I find the premise very credible. A lot of suspicious factoids around the situation. For example, I saw a report (unconfirmed) that the palisades water reservoir was offline and empty, reportedly for 'previously scheduled maintenance'. Well, ain't that an interesting coincidink?
soss:
https://www.timesnownews.com/world/us/us-news/was-palisades-reservoir-empty-when-the-fire-started-fact-checking-viral-claim-article-117181159
https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2025-01-10/as-flames-raged-in-palisades-a-key-reservoir-nearby-was-offline
If I've learned anything, it is that criminals can destroy evidence and get away with everything.
Who had already left the house and knew that the fire was coming? Best question yet!
i mean its pretty coincidental but what evidence would they be destroying?
Why would anyone need a wildfire to "cover their tracks?"
Why wouldn't simpler, easier, less noticeable methods be able to cover their tracks?
Not if they want to rebuilt the city into some smart city dystopian nightmare
So a different reason entirely?
Also
Have you driven in LA?
Yes, sure the roads suck and the drivers are terrible but there’s burning the place down to rebuild isn’t the solution
No one has actually suggested it is. This is just 100% unfounded speculation. Wildfires occur naturally based on environmental conditions. Dry vegetation and high winds mainly. A million acres burned last year in Texas.
And these conditions were all present in Southern California last month.
Storm activity in the fall was higher up the Pacific Coast leaving LA in drought.
One storm that hit Santa Cruz washed away the edge of the wharf. A dude surfed what might be the the biggest wave ever at Mavericks.
So LA was dry.
The Santa Ana wind events have been known about since the days of the Spanish Missions.
A strong Santa Ana wind event was on everyone's radar and was predicted the week before the fires.
And these were crazy strong winds. Reached 100 mph in some places.
Here's an early Jan report that said conditions were bad for LA.
For January, above normal significant fire potential is forecast across portions of southern California, much of central and south Texas, and from the central Florida Peninsula northward through the Panhandle and along the Atlantic coast into eastern Virginia.
https://www.nifc.gov/nicc-files/predictive/outlooks/monthly_seasonal_outlook.pdf
People are looking for someone to blame.
I dunno man, the way everyone is coming out about their great vision for LA 2.0 sounds a bit sus to me. They haven’t even waited for the embers to cool from their burning houses and these demons are blabbing about these projects they will be getting paid handsomely under the table for. Wake up Juan.
And yes, there is plenty of blame to spread around here. From the gov to the mayor and everyone in between
Who left early.
Very smart man!!
I love this guy, lol. Very clever, how he went over the top.
Like the black version of Morton Downey Jr.
Probably, who he intended to be, but all good.
yeah, mort probably couldn't drive a Ferrari either...
rip