Read it again. A Machine created by a Man. Do we want this advocating or controlling us ? NO, NO.
END OF STORY.
THEY ARE SELLING YOU A LIE.
THE ONLY THING THAT IS NOT A LIE IS WHEN YOU HAVE ELON MUSK OR MIKE ADAMS HONESTLY TELLING YOU THEY ARE TRANING THE MACHINE OR THE FAKE A.I. WITH HONEST HUMANS AND PATRIOTS. (GROK, ENOCH)
I will stop yelling now, because Google, stole your data, was written by DARPA , not your friend, to work against you.
Big Difference.
I agree. All of this ‘AI’ hype is being used to paint a rosy picture to attract and distract the mass population, as the BIG-SURVEILLANCE and BIG-CONTROL Camel gets his nose under the tent.
The algos are being programmed by evil people to achieve evil outcomes.
Computers do play pretty good chess though😀
Again, kill it. Kill it now.
John Conner is that you?
I build machine learning data. Most AI is not built to be as generalized as what you would want. I work with machine vision Ai. You try your best to remove bias but businesses have no clue what bias is in Ai or why it's bad. Bias can seem to be more accurate than unbiased algorithms becuase the people atthe top test the Ai in a biased way and it has better results than unbiased algorithms this flips as soon as the same Ai is tested in a new and unbiased situation. Now the biased algorithm fails and the generalized one does well.
Interesting inside on testing for bias in an unbiased way.
Each iteration of the A.I. is narrower than the one that proceeded it, while the hype is a large multiple of the previous. This current iteration consists of only one technology, neural networks (e.g., large language models), aka, pattern recognition.
The technology is not intelligent, it has no intuition or understanding. However, we are being conditioned to think it is infallible, that it knows more than us, and that it should be controlling us. Besides pulling in easy money, all the buzz around A.I. is to convince us that it is inevitable and can't be stopped.
But it will stop itself: neural networks are reaching the limits of what's possible. To "train" a network requires immense amounts of data, and energy. Each incremental gain in performance, say from ChatGPT 2.0 to 3.0, requires exponentially more data (You are just a data source. Think of this every time you fill out a survey!) to achieve less. The curve of ability is asymptotic.
Correct, I think of it as the same thing as the keyboard on your phone and how it predicts the next word. This but on crack.
And you're not afraid of your phone. Yet.
I think it will go the same way as internet search engines and social media. AI will start out useful showing huge promise but when people start trusting the technology it will be infiltrated to produce narrative based answers.
Very insidious, and highly likely. Once again, we willingly accept the collar and leash in the name of convenience.
Exactly. It's just a fast computer...
It is a MODEL.
However, there are many areas of human acts that are at least guided if not pushed by models, including but not limited to Climate models. Where do you think the Schwabist Highpriest Klaus gets his stuff from?
What about: alladin? Chart painting algo? You bet. But the whole Fin system is dependent on it.
Yup - they also built the models to achieve their means.
It’s not intelligent because all systems will give incorrect answers for the same question.
We cannot have a self replicating system tracking everyone secretly online with the goal of preserving it self. We literally have seen dozens of movies about this.
Big tech has even created robot killer dogs named terminators? They now want these drones and AI to have the authority to target and kill without an operator? This is evil.
But muh AGI Will be iNteLLiGENt (drools)
It will happen in Russia, China, etc. If it gives a strategic advantage then everyone will be researching it. Unfortunate as that may be for humanity