How tough are Army fitness tests these days? They've watered everything down for years' now. At this point it's probably a good stiff walk followed by being able to bend down and tie your shoes.
Women have lower physical standards in ALL Branches.
I've had the honor of serving with some badass females that would give most civilian men a seriously hard time physically. I mean, they were absolute "units" and did some amazing work...in the gym. But those were "unicorns."
That being said, I don't want them serving in certain combat or maintenance related specialties like Corpsman/Combat Medic, Ordnance related fields like Artillery and Navy/Marine Corps Aviation Ordnance (there is a very real difference between USAF AOs and NAVY/CORPS AOs), or any of the front line "bullet sponge" units like Infantry, Airborne, etc, or any of the SOF type units. It's a reality that they just can't physically keep up with men in those environments, and when they try, it slows down the unit, puts more stress on themselves and the men around them, and also leads to a non-cohesive unit due to the morale issues these reasons create.
Also, I've served with some absolute units of males that also had a hard time upholding the BMI standards BEFORE the standards were lowered under [Hussein] and Buyden. But, they could absolutely outrun, outlift, and out perform a lot of other men half their size, so when it comes to physical prowess, a lot of it boils down to mentality. "Do you want it bad enough to perform to th best of your abilities?"
Sadly, our society has had a very ha d time producing high caliber individuals that find their way into the military. It was true in the mid to late 90's when I first joined, it was true in the late 60's when my father was drafted, it was true when Grandpa Free served as a Combat Engineer in WWII Europe, and it is most definitely true today. We are quickly becoming (if we haven't already) a race of weak-minded people who are also physically and emotionally weak.
Also, just by looking at her and remembering what the physical standards were 30 yrs ago when I first joined the Navy, she'd absolutely be taped and most likely put on the Fat Boy Program and have some sort of Jacket Entry in her Service Record for failing to maintain the physical standards. However, if she's an Officer or Senior Enlisted (E-7 and above), all it would take is for her to shed a tear or two at her C.O. or OIC and, with her being an Officer, would most likely just end up being given extra time out of her day to hit the gym for an hour or two. Officers and Senior Enlisted above E-7 are treated much differently than Regular Enlisted (E-7 and below) when it comes to physical standards, especially the female Officers.
Never underestimate thick women. Especially ones that are nurses. Those pioneer women did not always look like the actresses on Yellowstone or other TV shows.
Pioneer women had to do heavy work alongside their men. Pioneers did not have servants or slaves.
Are we saying she doesn’t look fit? Ima have to disagree with that. She’s looks strong. Looks like great shape to me, if that’s where this thread is going.
That looks like a lard ass packed into some jeans to me, but I might have to agree with moodyblue on the photoshop. The face lacks fat in proportion to the fat ass.
I have had many friends with this body type over the years. They were not athletes. I know a lot of girls who were tiny from the waist up but below the waist the were mush and the most active thing they did was walk. One of them had to pass FITREPs.
I have many friends who are athletes and therapy live their life in the move. At her age her metabolism is still high enough to get away with a lot of inactivity and still be firm. the minimum exercise requirements in the military turn athletes into machines.
I have known a lot of military pilots as well and all of them could be described as "spare". Even in old age long after retirement they might develop a bit of a excess weight, but the are all reasonably fit. That is what is drummed into them if it is not an innate characteristic. As Hegseth said:
Diversity is not our strength. Our strength is our commitment to a common purpose.
From what I know, fitness is an essential part of that purpose. You don't put just get by types on CoG detail unless someone is pulling the strings very hard for them.
Maybe it’s because I see lots of “sports girls”. Just been around sports and the like, and the girls shaped like this could beat up wee men all day. Not saying they might get heavier has they age, who knows, but as far as physically fit, they run and practice with what seems like all day. Rough and tough. Maybe it’s a southern thang?
How tough are Army fitness tests these days? They've watered everything down for years' now. At this point it's probably a good stiff walk followed by being able to bend down and tie your shoes.
Woman marines standard is only 1 pull-up if I remember correctly.
That’s a photoshop if I’ve ever seen one.
Women have lower physical standards in ALL Branches.
I've had the honor of serving with some badass females that would give most civilian men a seriously hard time physically. I mean, they were absolute "units" and did some amazing work...in the gym. But those were "unicorns."
That being said, I don't want them serving in certain combat or maintenance related specialties like Corpsman/Combat Medic, Ordnance related fields like Artillery and Navy/Marine Corps Aviation Ordnance (there is a very real difference between USAF AOs and NAVY/CORPS AOs), or any of the front line "bullet sponge" units like Infantry, Airborne, etc, or any of the SOF type units. It's a reality that they just can't physically keep up with men in those environments, and when they try, it slows down the unit, puts more stress on themselves and the men around them, and also leads to a non-cohesive unit due to the morale issues these reasons create.
Also, I've served with some absolute units of males that also had a hard time upholding the BMI standards BEFORE the standards were lowered under [Hussein] and Buyden. But, they could absolutely outrun, outlift, and out perform a lot of other men half their size, so when it comes to physical prowess, a lot of it boils down to mentality. "Do you want it bad enough to perform to th best of your abilities?"
Sadly, our society has had a very ha d time producing high caliber individuals that find their way into the military. It was true in the mid to late 90's when I first joined, it was true in the late 60's when my father was drafted, it was true when Grandpa Free served as a Combat Engineer in WWII Europe, and it is most definitely true today. We are quickly becoming (if we haven't already) a race of weak-minded people who are also physically and emotionally weak.
Also, just by looking at her and remembering what the physical standards were 30 yrs ago when I first joined the Navy, she'd absolutely be taped and most likely put on the Fat Boy Program and have some sort of Jacket Entry in her Service Record for failing to maintain the physical standards. However, if she's an Officer or Senior Enlisted (E-7 and above), all it would take is for her to shed a tear or two at her C.O. or OIC and, with her being an Officer, would most likely just end up being given extra time out of her day to hit the gym for an hour or two. Officers and Senior Enlisted above E-7 are treated much differently than Regular Enlisted (E-7 and below) when it comes to physical standards, especially the female Officers.
Agree on the ethics of sending women to the front line...
She just looks beyond soft.
It is in the.arms and that isn't her pelvis adding to the distance between her hip pockets...
Never underestimate thick women. Especially ones that are nurses. Those pioneer women did not always look like the actresses on Yellowstone or other TV shows.
Pioneer women had to do heavy work alongside their men. Pioneers did not have servants or slaves.
Don't judge a book by its cover.
https://twitter.com/hodgetwins/status/1886104915480629413
The social media continues to bubble up..
Are we saying she doesn’t look fit? Ima have to disagree with that. She’s looks strong. Looks like great shape to me, if that’s where this thread is going.
That looks like a lard ass packed into some jeans to me, but I might have to agree with moodyblue on the photoshop. The face lacks fat in proportion to the fat ass.
I have had many friends with this body type over the years. They were not athletes. I know a lot of girls who were tiny from the waist up but below the waist the were mush and the most active thing they did was walk. One of them had to pass FITREPs.
I have many friends who are athletes and therapy live their life in the move. At her age her metabolism is still high enough to get away with a lot of inactivity and still be firm. the minimum exercise requirements in the military turn athletes into machines.
I have known a lot of military pilots as well and all of them could be described as "spare". Even in old age long after retirement they might develop a bit of a excess weight, but the are all reasonably fit. That is what is drummed into them if it is not an innate characteristic. As Hegseth said:
From what I know, fitness is an essential part of that purpose. You don't put just get by types on CoG detail unless someone is pulling the strings very hard for them.
Maybe it’s because I see lots of “sports girls”. Just been around sports and the like, and the girls shaped like this could beat up wee men all day. Not saying they might get heavier has they age, who knows, but as far as physically fit, they run and practice with what seems like all day. Rough and tough. Maybe it’s a southern thang?
Although this is a low resolution image it does look like the hips were widened in PS with the liquify filter. IMO
You are speaking Greek.
There’s a recent picture in Dress Blues; she didn’t look fat at all. I think this picture is fake news.
This one? This is 2018 when she was ROTC. https://x.com/Tweeklives/status/1886454588510810335.
I am thinking that the weight went on after Jan 2021 when she started social aide-ing