Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
GreatAwakening Where We Go Qne, We Go All!
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

33
Sufficiently fit to complete an Army PT course and FITREP? (media.greatawakening.win)
posted 1 year ago by Island_Photo 1 year ago by Island_Photo +33 / -0
16 comments download share
16 comments share download save hide report block hide replies
Comments (16)
sorted by:
▲ 8 ▼
– skidder1 8 points 1 year ago +8 / -0

How tough are Army fitness tests these days? They've watered everything down for years' now. At this point it's probably a good stiff walk followed by being able to bend down and tie your shoes.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– russiah 4 points 1 year ago +4 / -0

Woman marines standard is only 1 pull-up if I remember correctly.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– moodyblue 4 points 1 year ago +4 / -0

That’s a photoshop if I’ve ever seen one.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– SuckaFree 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

Women have lower physical standards in ALL Branches.

I've had the honor of serving with some badass females that would give most civilian men a seriously hard time physically. I mean, they were absolute "units" and did some amazing work...in the gym. But those were "unicorns."

That being said, I don't want them serving in certain combat or maintenance related specialties like Corpsman/Combat Medic, Ordnance related fields like Artillery and Navy/Marine Corps Aviation Ordnance (there is a very real difference between USAF AOs and NAVY/CORPS AOs), or any of the front line "bullet sponge" units like Infantry, Airborne, etc, or any of the SOF type units. It's a reality that they just can't physically keep up with men in those environments, and when they try, it slows down the unit, puts more stress on themselves and the men around them, and also leads to a non-cohesive unit due to the morale issues these reasons create.

Also, I've served with some absolute units of males that also had a hard time upholding the BMI standards BEFORE the standards were lowered under [Hussein] and Buyden. But, they could absolutely outrun, outlift, and out perform a lot of other men half their size, so when it comes to physical prowess, a lot of it boils down to mentality. "Do you want it bad enough to perform to th best of your abilities?"

Sadly, our society has had a very ha d time producing high caliber individuals that find their way into the military. It was true in the mid to late 90's when I first joined, it was true in the late 60's when my father was drafted, it was true when Grandpa Free served as a Combat Engineer in WWII Europe, and it is most definitely true today. We are quickly becoming (if we haven't already) a race of weak-minded people who are also physically and emotionally weak.

Also, just by looking at her and remembering what the physical standards were 30 yrs ago when I first joined the Navy, she'd absolutely be taped and most likely put on the Fat Boy Program and have some sort of Jacket Entry in her Service Record for failing to maintain the physical standards. However, if she's an Officer or Senior Enlisted (E-7 and above), all it would take is for her to shed a tear or two at her C.O. or OIC and, with her being an Officer, would most likely just end up being given extra time out of her day to hit the gym for an hour or two. Officers and Senior Enlisted above E-7 are treated much differently than Regular Enlisted (E-7 and below) when it comes to physical standards, especially the female Officers.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Island_Photo [S] 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

Agree on the ethics of sending women to the front line...

She just looks beyond soft.

It is in the.arms and that isn't her pelvis adding to the distance between her hip pockets...

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– 1baldeagle 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

Never underestimate thick women. Especially ones that are nurses. Those pioneer women did not always look like the actresses on Yellowstone or other TV shows.

Pioneer women had to do heavy work alongside their men. Pioneers did not have servants or slaves.

Don't judge a book by its cover.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Island_Photo [S] 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

https://twitter.com/hodgetwins/status/1886104915480629413

The social media continues to bubble up..

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Cyberhawk 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

Are we saying she doesn’t look fit? Ima have to disagree with that. She’s looks strong. Looks like great shape to me, if that’s where this thread is going.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Oblakhan 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

That looks like a lard ass packed into some jeans to me, but I might have to agree with moodyblue on the photoshop. The face lacks fat in proportion to the fat ass.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Island_Photo [S] 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

I have had many friends with this body type over the years. They were not athletes. I know a lot of girls who were tiny from the waist up but below the waist the were mush and the most active thing they did was walk. One of them had to pass FITREPs.

I have many friends who are athletes and therapy live their life in the move. At her age her metabolism is still high enough to get away with a lot of inactivity and still be firm. the minimum exercise requirements in the military turn athletes into machines.

I have known a lot of military pilots as well and all of them could be described as "spare". Even in old age long after retirement they might develop a bit of a excess weight, but the are all reasonably fit. That is what is drummed into them if it is not an innate characteristic. As Hegseth said:

Diversity is not our strength. Our strength is our commitment to a common purpose.

From what I know, fitness is an essential part of that purpose. You don't put just get by types on CoG detail unless someone is pulling the strings very hard for them.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Cyberhawk 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Maybe it’s because I see lots of “sports girls”. Just been around sports and the like, and the girls shaped like this could beat up wee men all day. Not saying they might get heavier has they age, who knows, but as far as physically fit, they run and practice with what seems like all day. Rough and tough. Maybe it’s a southern thang?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– photobuf 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Although this is a low resolution image it does look like the hips were widened in PS with the liquify filter. IMO

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Island_Photo [S] 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

You are speaking Greek.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– Johnnyrotten7878 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

There’s a recent picture in Dress Blues; she didn’t look fat at all. I think this picture is fake news.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Island_Photo [S] 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

This one? This is 2018 when she was ROTC. https://x.com/Tweeklives/status/1886454588510810335.

I am thinking that the weight went on after Jan 2021 when she started social aide-ing

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Welcome


The Great Awakening


We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.


WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q


Welcome to the Digital Battlefield — Together We Win

Rules


Q Supporters

This is The Great Awakening. Our community is international, focused on helping ourselves and others walk away from the programming, and return our governments to "by the people, for the people!"



Follow the Law

No posts or comments that violate laws in your jurisdiction or the United States. The Feds are always watching!



No Bad Behavior!

No doxing, including revealing personal information of non-public figures, as well as addresses, phone numbers, etc. of public figures. All GAW users must adhere to the highest standards of conduct, whichever .WIN they are on. If we are notified by other moderators of incivil behavior on other .WINs, you WILL be banned here!



Civil Discussion ONLY**

They want you divided.

They want you labeled by race, religion, class, sex, etc.

Divided you are weak [no collective power].

Divided you attack each other and miss the true target [them].



No PAYtriots/No Self Promotion

Linking or promoting merchandise, fundraising, or spamming personal websites, blogs, or channels is not permitted. Do not attempt to profit from Q or advertise for those who do. Peace is the prize. We do it for free.



Questions and Concerns

All moderation questions and concerns should be submitted via modmail. DO NOT GRIEF the mods.



Expand your thinking

Remember, this .WIN is the public face of the Great Awakening, and, as a member here, you agree to represent the Great Awakening movement against Globalism, Communism and Progressive Insanity in the best, most positive way possible. NOTE: Your comments and posts may become news. Keep it classy!

This is not a 'fringe conspiracy' site: Visit https://conspiracies.win if that's your thing!



No doomers or shills

If you can't use common sense, you'll get banned without hesitation. If you're a shill, you fall under this rule. If you're a doomer, you fall under this rule as you just add garbage to the site like the other two. This includes forum sliding.



General Rules

  • Mods will issue NO warnings, followed by temporary bans and/or permanent bans. DO NOT GRIEF THE MODS.

  • Keep posts related to topics Q has raised or that are current.

  • Keep post duplication (especially from other .WINs) to a minimum.

  • HIGH EFFORT, HIGH-INFO posts only! Please respect other readers' time. Please use descriptive titles. No URLs in titles, pls. No clickbait.

  • No fame-fagging; no, "your" post did not get removed! Were you the original author?? Eyes on the prize, people!

  • Memes encouraged, but no low-quality, low-info posts.

  • Keep it honest and accurate.

  • GAW Supporters ONLY. (Sorry, the train had no brakes.)

  • Handshake noobs will be scrutinized by their Q knowledge, sincerity, and respect.

  • Remember, your conduct here represents the Q movement! OUR ENEMIES ARE WATCHING!

  • Please direct all complaints to modmail first!


Resources


WELCOME TO THE DIGITAL BATTLEFIELD


"River of Search" script:


GAW post formatting tips


Q Research (Q only posts at 8kun)


Q post archives (qagg.news) others 1 2 3 4


Browse Drops from the beginning


QProofs.com


Learn to read the Q map


Book of Q Proofs v1.3 (pdf)


Law of War & Majic Eyes Qnly Resources


Trumps twitter archive


POTUS: The Calm Before The Storm


Pedosta and DNC dumps


GIFs & QPosts


Poll Post Format


SPY ON US! See: mod Logs


The Greatest Show on Earth!


New to Q? "The Earth Chronicles Ep 12: Q & The White-Hat Op: What's Real, What's Not?"


Moderators

  • dropgun
  • catsfive
  • AutoMod
  • Filter
  • Fatality
  • Qanaut
  • bubble_bursts
  • Brent75
  • and 8 more...
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - whmbz (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy