Okay, sure, I don't know who downvoted You so, upvote. But the problem is is that so much of these theories rely on the personal incredulity fallacy.Look at the LM! Doesn't it look goofy! That doesn't look like a spaceship at all! Can you believe they flew this to the moon! Not hardly!

The moon has 1/6th Earth's gravity and has no atmosphere. All they need to send up is a basic pressure cabin and some instruments. Save weight and send extra oxygen. This isn't rocket science. Wait.

Totally agree. Flat earth is a psyop from the cabal itself created to do exactly what you already said. No, we are not a pancake disk floating in the middle of the universe. But now any discussion that questions the mainstream propaganda about the true positioning of the earth and cosmos gets a derangement tantrum response just as bad as someone with TDS. The cabal did a good job with this hypnosis to shut down any type of thinking outside of their narrative.

I think NASA has engaged in multiple hoaxes through the years but that doesn't mean FE. Just means they've been radically stealing our money along with every other federal group out there. Hair spray and harnesses and ridiculously slow movement when there's supposed to be no-friction vacuum, and actual bubbles caught on video have thoroughly destroyed their credibility. Yet there are satellites and heavenly bodies possibly observable with personal devices that move in ways FE cannot explain reasonably.

Debating points of reason, fact and observation should be allowed; unfortunately those folks don't seem to be able to do that, and they carry a lot of other crazy baggage with them, but maybe that is their reason for being, to demolish logical debate.

That you think chemtrails are more retarded than Flat Earth, shows how uninteligent you are.

Apparently airline logistics allow for many condensation stripes to appear in grid patterns, but these airplanes could not be dumping something in the atmosphere while they're flying there?

Logistics allow for condensation stripes, but not the dumping of chemicals. Right... And because you don't have a satisfactory answer, no one is allowed to talk about it and you call them retards because they see things differently than you.

And why do have to sticky this post? Is it because you actually are arrogant and full of yourself?

I have yet to see a cogent theory that explains the airline logistics

The stuff being sprayed is mostly fly ash. Many tests have proven that. (It contains high concentrations of the heavy metals, aluminum, barium and strontium). Fly ash is a waste product requiring no additional processing - effectively free - but highly toxic. https://www.treehugger.com/what-is-coal-ash-5113738

Two types of airliner plane are being flown by branches of the military (I forget the make/model. I'm not a plane enthusiast). Most planes are acquired from airline scrappers in used condition and gutted/refurbished to take the containers, nozzles, pipes and pumps. There are no legitimate photos of the equipment AFAIK but it's documented. (There are alleged photos but I think they are from crop sprayers and firefighting planes.)

The particulate sprays remain in the air for hours and gradually spread out to form a white mist. (I've personally photographed this many times.) It's impossible to create that effect with frozen water vapor (contrails). It simply can't be done and if it could it would require very specific weather conditions found only at high altitude.

The logistics of transporting the fly ash to the take-off points of the planes worldwide are not complex - transporting innocuous ash won't raise eyebrows - but it's incredibly expensive - the transportation and flying costs amount to billions each year. But American taxpayers foot the bill through the black budget (thanks).

The problem of keeping it (relatively) secret is on a par with that of the Manhattan project. Pilots are allegedly told that the operation is to combat "climate change". They probably have to sign the official secrets act, which is extremely effective at closing loose lips.

But if you are a particulate spray denier, then consider this: assuming that the spreading mist really comes from "just contrails", it still covers the sky and affects the temperature: it reflects the sun during the day, for certain; it might also keep the earth warmer at night. It reduces energy from solar panels (ask me how I know). It affects telescopic viewing of the moon, planets and stars. It probably blocks observation of parts of the earth from space. It acts as a reflective layer for terrestrial signals of certain frequencies. The point is that the trails are affecting the temperature; why is nobody investigating the consequences?

Now consider this: most videos, nowadays, that include a scan of the sky show trails spreading outwards. Check out YouTube for many examples. But prior to 1990 there are no videos showing this effect. However, the first jet airliner to enter service, the de Havilland Comet, made its maiden commercial flight on May 2, 1952. The Comet 1, designed by de Havilland in the UK, was capable of cruising at altitudes between 35,000 and 40,000 feet. So from around 1960 to 1990 the sky should have increasingly been full of trails. Check out old videos, movies, documentaries from that period. There are no trails. (I last visited Phoenix in July 1991. The sky was clear for a fortnight.)

FInally, I haven't answered the unasked question, "why would [they] do this?" I really don't know. It makes no sense to me. One theory is that they want to poison us slowly. If this is true then we'd surely be seeing increases of Alzheimer's, autism, breathing problems, autoimmune problems and other symptoms of heavy metal poisoning. Another theory is to control the weather and I must say that each time I see the trails, I can guarantee that it will rain within 48 hours.

Anyway, this has nothing to do with the stupid FE theory and it wasn't my intention to prompt any discussion here. But you basically said you wanted info. about the theory and this covers my research, in a nutshell.

10.30 pm my bedtime. Goodnight all. {-O ZZZzzz

How about clones that are grown in a few years, or months - I haven't seen what the claim is there - to something looking and behaving exactly like the person they are clone of, and then used to replace that person?

Of course clones are a reality, but it takes as many years to grow that identical twin of somebody as it took for them to grow up, and they'd have to grow and learn in near exact copy of the life their grown up twin did in order to become an exact copy... and not even natural identical twins who have grown together are exact copies of each other when it comes to their character even if they share the same DNA. I'd be more inclined to believe that something like robots that are advanced enough to look and behave like some human well enough that they can fool almost everybody, even people interacting with that robot at close range constantly, were already possible than I am inclined to suspect that kind of "clones" were. Especially since if you started with natural human DNA what you'd get would be a human, with their own personality and their own will, not some programmable flesh robot.

(When it comes to those actual robots this is admittedly looking a bit worrisome https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2025/02/dangling-twitching-human-robot-with-synthetic-muscles-makes-its-debut/ )

In the 1960s we had the government spray chemicals over St Louis that were dangerous, just to see what would happen. I believe that would be more like a crop dusting situation. That's why I find it hard to believe the efficiency of chemtrails doing anything to contaminate the air at a meaningful degree.

There’s a video out there with a pilot that literally shows how he is able to turn on and off those “white lines” in the air. I live near an airport and there are constant flights however some days are complete blue sky and then others full of white skid marks. Most planes don’t have a trail of white after them. If it’s not chemicals in the lines what are they and why do they only come out of some planes? These are important questions we could discuss to educate ourselves further but sadly the conversation is banned on GAW until RFK jR mentions it a magical number of times (you already recognized he mentioned it but yet refuse the conversation until when exactly?)

It's a psyop to direct attention away from the real reason NASA lies: there is a secret black budget space program and NASA are a smokescreen for that.

There are two FE theories out there. One is a psyop to discredit the truth from the other one. It was the psyop they got away with and will keep the globalists in power behind the curtains. Do anons still not understand we have been lied to about everything? Why would FE be any different? Look at how heavily it’s attacked on Google. It’s nearly impossible to find a group of FE truthers anymore because they been ridiculed and banned everywhere - and especially by the people we here on GAW despite the most. So unless you know where to go and find the real people and the real theory/truth all you will be able to find is some debunking theories of why you shouldn’t believe FE is real.