All done with winning in mind: Jeff Childer's has a fascinating take on this -- it's part of a plan. The decision on the TRO was no big deal and should have gone the way it did, but the orders back to the issuing judge, along with the dissent were a major slap down.
As to Barrett's face:
I have no idea what anti-Trump motives may lurk in Justice Coney Barrett’s mind, or whether she was just thinking about how, if her husband asks her one more time to find the spicy pickles when they were literally right there on the top shelf, that’s it, she’s getting a divorce. Same face.
Lets send this to the US supreme court
Too many liberal justices on US Supreme Court. We can't even stop making payments to USAID because of them.
All done with winning in mind: Jeff Childer's has a fascinating take on this -- it's part of a plan. The decision on the TRO was no big deal and should have gone the way it did, but the orders back to the issuing judge, along with the dissent were a major slap down.
As to Barrett's face:
Good link. I enjoyed the read. Thank you!
You bet. Childers does some really amazing analysis without have a inkling about "The Plan."
This was a starter Supreme Court.
Probably should...
Keep fathers from getting locked up...and "healthcare" workers from getting lumped up...
Or let's send those doing it in the ground. No one has to right force vaccinate a child.