DJT hinted at an inuaguration on March 4
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (37)
sorted by:
I don't think it is as much "hinted at AN inauguration" as he actually "referenced THE inauguration".
Justice Roberts swore DJT in on Inauguration Day.
Of course, plausible deniability, but I think this is a bit of a stretch. For me, anyway. But maybe that's just me.
It's good to draw on all sorts of strings, and work even out there ideas, but unless they coalesce into substantial tangible results, they usually don't mean much. That's why we did and research, tho, right?
It’s interesting how many handshakes are in this thread.
:) looks like they're going all out with the forum sliding tactics on this post...maybe i am onto something?
Could it be that there have been two inaugurations? Why post that now if you're DJT when the division has been being sowed the whole time? Wasn't the March 4th address a great excuse to get everyone back in DC again?
It could all just be coincidence or maybe we are watching a movie and behind the scenes the old guard is being destroyed and the republic being restored?
I think it's fine questioning this. Was kind of a weird statement by POTUS to put out there.
I personally feel that this post is just calling out the fake news media. They heard him say thank you on the hot mic, and made up negative reasons on why he would be thanking Roberts.
When in reality, it was just to thank him for swearing him in on inauguration day.
I don't know about you, but I am getting so tired of batting away the imaginary butterflies. 8>)
On Inauguration Day? He didn’t say anything about it being March 4 here he’s referencing the swearing in that occurred on Inauguration Day. Where do you see any reference to March 4 being Inauguration Day instead of January 20?
The connections here produced out of thin air are astonishing. Could that be why viewers have left in droves?
People thought limiting shilling, FE, and CT to stay on topic would be good for the community. That’s the low hanging fruit. The harder thing to handle is this low effort Q-ish content that waters down the site.
You mean like the ingersoll larpwood hype again?
Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me dozen times over a few years ummm, yeah you deserve to be played!
At least one jann here actively promotes this counter-awakening type content. I'm convinced they are connected to it probably not dissimilar to how Neon Revolt infiltrated the reddit and voat boards.
This isn't Q-ish. This is Q+ posting something interesting on truth social and looking for thoughtful insight.
That’s why I think it’s hard to moderate. Sharing Trump’s TS posts and discussing it is great. The implication that John Roberts held a special inauguration for Trump on March 4th is interesting because of the date, but it doesn’t answer the obvious followup question of why John Roberts would be relevant to a March 4th inauguration. If that’s what is playing out, why does the existing Supreme Court have any relevance?
Do any of the current positions we are seeing have relevence if there is a restored republic being set up? How would the inauguration be done if a new republic were being put in place given all the theatrics being shown to the public?
Maybe Roberts really did do a great job botching the Jan 20 inauguration and wasn't needed at a March 4th. I don't really know but think there's more to this truth DJT posted and sometimes the hive mind here at GAW has filled in a lot of blanks for me over the past few years.
We do expect it to be done “by the book”. I’ll admit that I don’t know what that looks like when it comes to occupation, restored republic, and the DoD manual.
It sure is interesting that DJT didn't post something like this a month ago right? The fake news has been trying to drive division since jan 20.
Why now? Why place that part in ALL CAPS? and why right after the March 4th address that gave a great excuse to get everyone together in DC again?
Because the MSM got him thanking Roberts on March 4th. Roberts was at the address to joint session.
I don't find that interesting at all. This didn't happen a month ago.
Pure speculation is pure speculation unless supported or sustained by facts and evidence.
Why now?
What a silly question. Because he was responding to the MSM’s reaction to him thanking Roberts at the address.
No he didn’t. He was talking about Jan,20 when Robert’s swore him in!
This is interesting.
It's interesting to me because Justice Roberts did not do a good job swearing him in! Melania was still seated with the Bible in her hand she was to hold! She had to rush up after he started. They did not do this swearing in Vance. But Roberts did it to Trump. I think Trump was being snarky thanking him because he is now the president and telling him he did a good job, because he didn't and he pointed it out to his face! That's my take.
Could be...or it could have been purposeful to do it poorly on Jan 20? Getting everyone together again on March 4th is pretty interesting and then to have DJT post this is pretty interesting to me.
agreed
🤦♀️ I swear to God, I think people are just bored and have way too much free time on their hands when they have to do all these mental acrobats in order to find something, anything, that might be some super duper secret conspiracy that only they have figured out.
Yup. A lot anons are losers IRL with nothing going for them ever in their life, so they are naturally “misfits”. They gravitate towards fringe movements as a way to fit in and feel like they belong SOMEWHERE. They discover contrived schizophrenic-leaning “theories” and then tell the “normies” (people they wanted to be, but couldn’t?) about their theories and try and bring them on board, but that’s the catch, they don’t REALLY want to bring normies on board, because that would ruin and diminish their awoken based identity..
Unfortunately, I agree with pretty much everything you just said.
Not good to swear to God over something like this.
Were you around for chidlren or covfefe or challenging michelle to bball? Expecting DJT comms to only mean the obvious is mental laziness
Bad take.
I think he hinted at thanking Roberts for getting him a gallon of milk.
I mean, really, where the hell did March 4th get connected to this?!?
Anons in sheep’s clothing?
Anybody notice this TruthSocial post? Maybe we were onto something with all the march 4th talk?
Is anyone else bothered by the double DOINGs in the "Capitol" section?
DOING, DOING is 5,5 letters starting with letter 4,4.
I didn't notice it before but now you've got me thinking...
Sorry. I'm not sure that's allowed here. Or if it is, maybe avoid DOING it aloud.
It's too bad. I used to come on here quite a bit but it's nearly been reduced to a news feed :(
I agree with you on that point, sort of. GAW has morphed into a bit of a news aggregation site, with lots of posters not even bothering to reference sauce in their titles, just copy pasting. There's very little + alpha. Just copy paste. I find this disappointing.
On that note, I appreciate you attempting to look at the DJT post and figure out if it means something, BUT I also think that it's very flimsy.
is it interdasting that Johnson invited Potus to address a joint session on March 4th? Possibly. Formerly inauguration day, ok.
However, such broad speculation that it's significant needs to be augmented by factual information.
I think the basic premise, that DJT "hinted at a March 4 inauguration" in this tweet is a bit wild.
If one HAS the foundation, all the other things in place, the facts, ties, connections, THEN a 'hint' like this might be relevant. But the problem is, all those others things are not there. Just pure speculation.
let me illustrate giving an example. The "air Qs". Now, some folks swear thjat any time DJT does the circle and points at someone, that it's an air Q. (Myself, I think that some were, but also that this is a favorite gesture of DJT, and that not all of the gestures are Air Qs.)
But, the foundation for looking at a particular gesture by DJT and interpreting it as some sort of comms - air q - came on the extremely solid foundation of the Q operation, the drops, the whole Q movement, running for many months, and lots and lots of data points telling us that DJT is "Q+" etc.
On that solid and broad foundation, interpreting the simple gesture as an 'air q' makes sense.
BUT, if that solid foundation wasn't there, if, for example, prior to the Q drops, Trump had drawn the gesture, it would be a wild leap to interpret it as some sort of signal about the letter Q.
In my view, we are in a completely different phase of things now. The Q drop operation is over. It extended for a period of roughly 3 years, and had a specific purpose. So there is no real or logical reason for DJT to be dropping secret comms in this way now. I agree that some things are there - the 'weaves'' where if you know, you know, and we can observe DJT communicating on various levels.
But DJT somehow hinting that there was a secret inauguration on March 4 - what purpose would that serve?
I think we need to direcft our mental efforts and research efforts in a new direction now. DJT is not in 2017-2020 mode. Nor is the work.
Times change, the war moves into different phases, and warriors need to adjust, step up, and find out what the 'mandate' is that we now have.
$0.02
🤣